The greataxe vs. knife debate. What about having faster weapons like a knife offer more attacks due to speed? Maybe 2 attacks but since it is a smaller weapon you attack at a Disadvantage?
I think what they're trying to do is treat Favored Enemies like Cleric Domains. You choose a Favored Enemy species and gain the powers and skill sets needed to fight that enemy which also applies to everything else you fight. So basically, you'd have different types of rangers with different types of powers and skills.
Because I don't want to see this column go, I'm going to be selfish and ask you to write another couple entries. We have learned a bunch about Iomandra, but I'm extremely curious about the type of campaign you are considering running next. Therefore, I would really appreciate you giving us some insight into the themes that are getting you excited for the next go around. I think this would be the perfect "intermission" for you column, as I refuse to believe you have run out of topics...
View full commentBecause I don't want to see this column go, I'm going to be selfish and ask you to write another couple entries.
We have learned a bunch about Iomandra, but I'm extremely curious about the type of campaign you are considering running next. Therefore, I would really appreciate you giving us some insight into the themes that are getting you excited for the next go around.
I think this would be the perfect "intermission" for you column, as I refuse to believe you have run out of topics to talk about forever.
If you are truly finished, then I would suggest WotC begins a new column where each week you have a different employee talk about a memorable campaign, adventure, or encounter they have run or played in; it's these stories that help inspire us all.
I have few words that can do my thoughts justice, but I'd like to try. Very simply, Dungeon Mastering is the reason I can feel "okay" in this place, and your words are the reason I am a Dungeon Master. I don't think I can ever thank you enough for that. Appreciated. - Barker
View full commentI have few words that can do my thoughts justice, but I'd like to try. Very simply, Dungeon Mastering is the reason I can feel "okay" in this place, and your words are the reason I am a Dungeon Master. I don't think I can ever thank you enough for that.
All that may be true, but admit it - this direction of D&Dnext is rekindling the flames of hope, and nostalgia is beginning to surface. The perfect mix of old and new (or so we hope). PS - I love the idea of bounded accuracy, as I feel we are finally going back to role playing rather than knockoffs of video game design bonuses.
View full commentAll that may be true, but admit it - this direction of D&Dnext is rekindling the flames of hope, and nostalgia is beginning to surface. The perfect mix of old and new (or so we hope).
PS - I love the idea of bounded accuracy, as I feel we are finally going back to role playing rather than knockoffs of video game design bonuses.
I like being creative. I am even a fan of some "over the top" concepts. However, just like in a movie, special effects can be overdone; likewise, special effects can't always compensate for a bad movie. One of the main reasons I cannot take modern horror movies seriously is because they too often spray gore and blood around and hope the audience won't notice that the movie is terrible. In contrast, I don't believe Hitchcock ever actually showed a person being murdered in his movies; yet,...
View full commentI like being creative. I am even a fan of some "over the top" concepts. However, just like in a movie, special effects can be overdone; likewise, special effects can't always compensate for a bad movie. One of the main reasons I cannot take modern horror movies seriously is because they too often spray gore and blood around and hope the audience won't notice that the movie is terrible. In contrast, I don't believe Hitchcock ever actually showed a person being murdered in his movies; yet, he's still viewed as one of the best directors of the genre.
I do agree that players often remember the oddities and wackiness of a campaign. However, the most amount of pride I ever took away from a game was when the players remembered the story itself as being good. To be sure, there was a lot of cool stuff I included in my last 4th Edition game. I had arcane hover bikes; high speed chases, and all manner of other things, but none of them would have been anything without the underlying quality of the campaign. This article gives great advice, but sometimes you can do a lot with very little.
Quite literally all of those have happened in my groups campaigns... Probably the most over the top thing that has happened was a character in a campaign became the avatar of Olidammara, after being given a deck of chaos which was used to choose which of the party members would ultimately be the champion. The characters then meet this character again some years later in the next campaign and find that the character has transported to the Dark Sun campaign setting where he then split in 5 parts...
View full commentQuite literally all of those have happened in my groups campaigns... Probably the most over the top thing that has happened was a character in a campaign became the avatar of Olidammara, after being given a deck of chaos which was used to choose which of the party members would ultimately be the champion. The characters then meet this character again some years later in the next campaign and find that the character has transported to the Dark Sun campaign setting where he then split in 5 parts to become the ultimate Lawful Good, Lawful Evil, Chaotic Good, Chaotic Evil, and Chaotic Neutral beings which then had to duke it out highlander style (one controlled by the player who's character it really was) for the ability to be called the only one. All of this is happening while they have armies coming to invade their town (run by the party under a false pretense of not being magical (one was a blood mage and another a wizard) and helping sorcerers escape) while they put sorcerer's into a ghetto to "protect them" before ultimately giving them up and climbing a sorcerer's tower where the illegitimate son's of one of the character's children grow up and turn out to be Bigby and Mordenkainen who were raised in an artificial time loop to kill their father because he caused the death of their mother (a prostitute he chose not to pay) with his defiling magic. All leading up to the epic final battle where the gods come into Dark Sun in order to stop the players from becoming gods Bahamut leading the final attack.
...halflings should return to their origins -hobbits- if we want that the power-of-the-genre-archetypes concept which D&D is based upon since it came to life spread its magic; it seems they do so and I'm very happy!
I've always thought of the Hydra as a multi-headed snake - a snake body, and each of its heads is a snake head, rather than a dragon-like head. I'd be find with multi-headed dragons being some other thing, but to me, the Hydra in popular culture is very strongly slanted in favor of snake-like. -Andy
View full commentI've always thought of the Hydra as a multi-headed snake - a snake body, and each of its heads is a snake head, rather than a dragon-like head. I'd be find with multi-headed dragons being some other thing, but to me, the Hydra in popular culture is very strongly slanted in favor of snake-like.
I have always thought of the Hydra are a sort of amphibian with skin that looked like that of a Frog. With that being said I always pictured the Hydra having a body and legs best suited for the water but was never constrained to just Lakes, Rivers, and Seas. How does that fit with all of you out there what are your opinions?
RE Hydra: You want to cut off hydra heads because: - you get a respite from its attacks - it's much easier to do than attacking the body - the body is much harder to hit, has lots of HP, usually hidden (in a swamp, in the sand, etc), and attacking it might expose the attacker to devastating attacks. - the heads are coming right at you, so they are easier to hit (and perhaps intentionally not cutting them makes it easier for them to hit or something?). But I...
View full commentRE Hydra:
You want to cut off hydra heads because:
- you get a respite from its attacks
- it's much easier to do than attacking the body
- the body is much harder to hit, has lots of HP, usually hidden (in a swamp, in the sand, etc), and attacking it might expose the attacker to devastating attacks.
- the heads are coming right at you, so they are easier to hit (and perhaps intentionally not cutting them makes it easier for them to hit or something?).
But I wouldn't say you HAVE to cut all of the heads, or that the body is immune to all damage, as that is a bit contrived. Give the party a chance to strategize. Maybe they'll find a better way of killing the creature, given the specific context (surroundings, resources, classes in the party, etc), and then cutting the heads would be something to avoid.
While I personally think that the 1st and 2nd edition covers are the best (and I admit, I may be biased to those editions), I think that the 4th edition cover is one that if you covered up the D&D name I would have thought Dungeons & Dragons the minute that I saw the artwork.
Expertise dice... Great idea but...the first iterations of the playtest were more ‘old school’. Looks like we are moving back to extreme damage die rolls again… Things like the Fighter surge.. shudder! 12d6 suddenly? Very naff! A more interesting expertise progression might be… A simple d6, d8, d10, d12, 2d6, d6d8, d610, d6d12, d8d12, d10d12 2d12. This is more than sufficient expertise dice for all classes and ensures players think when and how to spend their dice. I also...
View full commentExpertise dice...
Great idea but...the first iterations of the playtest were more ‘old school’. Looks like we are moving back to extreme damage die rolls again… Things like the Fighter surge.. shudder! 12d6 suddenly? Very naff!
A more interesting expertise progression might be…
A simple d6, d8, d10, d12, 2d6, d6d8, d610, d6d12, d8d12, d10d12 2d12. This is more than sufficient expertise dice for all classes and ensures players think when and how to spend their dice.
I also noticed the Barbar has automatic damage per hit like the fighter, rogue and cleric. Sorry guys –awful idea – just too extreme – automatic lumps of damage and in mega serviings too ! It’s a way of disguising yet another group of d6 damage lumps.
There simply no need for this extra damage at all. An extra to hit roll for the character would be more interesting and allow for a miss as well.
I like the overall thrust… but tone down the damage again. Remember the original thrust etc.
Its OK not to do 60 points per swing, in fact its better not too. Because when players can do extreme damage, so can monsters.. which means inevitably characters get hit in a fashion that roleplaying and quick thinking can’t influence – there no time.
But with less damage a smart party can turn a situation around – they’ve got time to live past that first initial damage train.
I agree, though it does annoy me that Paladins have to be lawful good. This is the only class that is restricted to good as their alignment, and I have always felt that a paladin could be lawful neutral or lawful evil instead, though the class description may take a little modification.
I think each class having the maneuver mechanic should have a different die size equal to the size of his hit dice: example, the fighter should have 6 d10 expert dice at high levels, when the monk has 6 d8 and the rogue 6d6. Also, on the subject of weapon choices, every characters had time only to learn two (2) weapons in the list given to his class, except for the fighter, who his better trained with weapons, who learns how to use two groups of similar weapons. His damage with such a...
View full commentI think each class having the maneuver mechanic should have a different die size equal to the size of his hit dice: example, the fighter should have 6 d10 expert dice at high levels, when the monk has 6 d8 and the rogue 6d6.
Also, on the subject of weapon choices, every characters had time only to learn two (2) weapons in the list given to his class, except for the fighter, who his better trained with weapons, who learns how to use two groups of similar weapons. His damage with such a weapon are one dice size better than other character using the same weaapon: example, a longsword in his hands do 1d12 damage while in the hand of a rogue it will do 1d10. Melee weapons groups: blades, axes, flails, polearms (including quaterstaff), maces (including hammers), pikes. Ranged weapons: Thrown, Flails, Slings, crossbows, bows, siege machines.
Thirdly, fighters styles should be related to his weapon of choices, while the paladin styles should be related to his actions. Example: a fighter is an archer or a axeman, or a swordman, etc. A paladin is a defender or a slayer or cavalier, or a knight, etc.
To clarify, there is no difference between background and profession. More skills are needed, but profession is a category which helps define the character's skills. A woodcutter, for example, would be recommended to have the skills Climb, Drive, Gather Information, Plants Knowledge and Use Rope, while the ability of a woodcutter to fell trees would be described narratively, without specifying restrictive limits such as how long it takes or how much damage a falling tree would do. A character...
View full commentTo clarify, there is no difference between background and profession. More skills are needed, but profession is a category which helps define the character's skills. A woodcutter, for example, would be recommended to have the skills Climb, Drive, Gather Information, Plants Knowledge and Use Rope, while the ability of a woodcutter to fell trees would be described narratively, without specifying restrictive limits such as how long it takes or how much damage a falling tree would do. A character with two or more professions would use class feature substitution, noted under career path, training or what you may call it, to get more skills than the 6 or 8 options normally available. Similar substitutions available at more specific points in one's career could grant the character other races' traits, religious ordination, a bonus to a specific skill area such as desert survival or dragons, or more general scholarly expertise. It is encouraging to see skills of narrow scope such as Diplomacy and Use Rope emphasized.
I am not sure I will go through with it; I was just brainstorming. I was going for a noirish type of set up. I like demons as primal spirits, because there is a surplus of bad guy elemental types (giants, efrets, archons), not enough primal spirit bad guys, and Balors aside, they don't look very elemental. Besides, the notion that nature is out of whack has some storytelling potential.
View full commentI am not sure I will go through with it; I was just brainstorming. I was going for a noirish type of set up.
I like demons as primal spirits, because there is a surplus of bad guy elemental types (giants, efrets, archons), not enough primal spirit bad guys, and Balors aside, they don't look very elemental. Besides, the notion that nature is out of whack has some storytelling potential.