|
2 years ago ::
May 14, 2011 - 10:07AM
#471
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2010
|
I looked at some more current songs, but I'm pretty sure this is still Sunshine's theme.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 15, 2011 - 3:18AM
#472
|
Date Joined:
Oct 19, 2008
|
Due to issues with the CoCo roller, I suggest that invisible castle is used.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 18, 2011 - 11:51AM
#473
|
Date Joined:
Nov 17, 2009
|
Character Sheet Update: Synopsis of Changes available in the Character Sheet post. As for my internet situation; I've explained what's up here.I also like the theme song; especially that bit about the savior of the universe and king of the impossible. I'll have to find one for you guys.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 19, 2011 - 8:00AM
#474
|
|
|
Updated my character sheet; retrained Sudden Roots for Inner Compass.
D&D 4E Herald and M:tG Rules Advisor I expect posters to follow the Code of Conduct, use Basic Etiquette, and avoid Poor Logic. If you don't follow these guidelines, I consider you to be disrespectful to everyone on these forums. If you respond to me without following these guidelines, I consider it a personal attack. I grew up in a bilingual household, which means I am familiar with the difficulties in adopting a different vocabulary and grammar. That doesn't bother me. Persistent use of bad capitalization, affirming the consequent, and flaming bother me a great deal. Rule that I would change: 204.1b
Show
204.1b Some effects change an object’s card type, supertype, or subtype but specify that the object retains a prior card type, supertype, or subtype. In such cases, all the object’s prior card types, supertypes, and subtypes are retained. This rule applies to effects that use the phrase “in addition to its types” or that state that something is “still a [card type].” Some effects state that an object becomes an “artifact creature”; these effects also allow the object to retain all of its prior card types and subtypes.
"Eight Edition Rules Update"
We eventually decided not to change this template, because players are used to “becomes an artifact creature,” and like it much better. Players were used to Combat on the Stack, but you got rid of that because it was unintuitive. The only phrase needed is "in addition to its types"; the others are misleading and unintuitive.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 19, 2011 - 9:33AM
#475
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2010
|
Updated Sunshine to level 7. He's going to give 360 gp of residuum to the sage to craft a +1 holy symbol.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 19, 2011 - 1:44PM
#476
|
Date Joined:
Oct 19, 2008
|
PapaMidnight. I am guessing you are not aware that we are using inherent bonuses, so spending 360gp in that way will be a total waste.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 19, 2011 - 1:53PM
#477
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2010
|
PapaMidnight. I am guessing you are not aware that we are using inherent bonuses, so spending 360gp in that way will be a total waste.
Ah! OK, consider that cancelled. I don't think I want to spend more than that - no point in having rituals but no residuum to cast them. I'm off to look up inherent bonuses.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 19, 2011 - 2:55PM
#478
|
Date Joined:
Jul 11, 2008
|
I'll see if the Sage is capable of crafting Bracers of Archery and Arrows of Onslaught and Firestorm.
I'll leave the 2200 gp of residuum with the Sage.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
May 31, 2011 - 9:44AM
#479
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2010
|
Well, unless I missed something, having a +1 holy symbol isn't a *total* waste. I'd do +1d6 damage with a critical hit... but yeah, not really worth it.
Hey, it sure is quiet around here.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jun 01, 2011 - 10:26AM
#480
|
|
|
Atua is using a revision of the modifiers where we still get the +1d6 on crit with weapon or implement.
D&D 4E Herald and M:tG Rules Advisor I expect posters to follow the Code of Conduct, use Basic Etiquette, and avoid Poor Logic. If you don't follow these guidelines, I consider you to be disrespectful to everyone on these forums. If you respond to me without following these guidelines, I consider it a personal attack. I grew up in a bilingual household, which means I am familiar with the difficulties in adopting a different vocabulary and grammar. That doesn't bother me. Persistent use of bad capitalization, affirming the consequent, and flaming bother me a great deal. Rule that I would change: 204.1b
Show
204.1b Some effects change an object’s card type, supertype, or subtype but specify that the object retains a prior card type, supertype, or subtype. In such cases, all the object’s prior card types, supertypes, and subtypes are retained. This rule applies to effects that use the phrase “in addition to its types” or that state that something is “still a [card type].” Some effects state that an object becomes an “artifact creature”; these effects also allow the object to retain all of its prior card types and subtypes.
"Eight Edition Rules Update"
We eventually decided not to change this template, because players are used to “becomes an artifact creature,” and like it much better. Players were used to Combat on the Stack, but you got rid of that because it was unintuitive. The only phrase needed is "in addition to its types"; the others are misleading and unintuitive.
|
|
|
