Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 17 of 21  •  Prev 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21 Next
Switch to Forum Live View [4E] Five From Fellenor - OOC
5 months ago  ::  Jan 11, 2013 - 6:44PM #161
TheSalmonOfDoubt
Date Joined: May 14, 2012
Posts: 314
Hi guys. I apologize for my absence. Some stuff came up in real life, and I had to step back a bit. I've been back a few days now, but jsut realized that it would probably be good to officially announce my resignation from this game. It was fun for the little while I played in it. I also thought not leaving you guys in the dark about where I went would be nice. Sorry again, have fun with the PbP.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 14, 2013 - 3:48PM #162
GROMkill
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2011
Posts: 448
My apologies, I didn't post because I thought Wilhelm passed the last skill challenge requirement.

@LM

Do you mind if I roll an Intimidate roll, to attempt to teach the rookies how to be a fearsome warrior? The way I see it, Dossk would be teaching them how to strike fear in the enemy, as he can (He has Dragonfear, the DB racial). He would be showing them basically not just how to fight, but how to fight like an intimidating badass, and from the looks of these baby-faced recruits, they really could use that.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 15, 2013 - 6:32PM #163
LordManshoon
Date Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Posts: 3,969
@GROMkill - Go for it. I like the sound of it.

After GROMkill is ready, I will update.
My Sig Show
Reality is but the sum total of all illusions.
Proud Hand of Karsus, now and forever
Mess with one Hand, mess with 'em all
I am Blue/Green
I am Blue/Green
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

"just do what LM the lord of magical might does, and you'll be fine" - sfdragon, 10/12/09


My Ravnican Loyalties Show


Board Snippets Show

Jul 3, 2012 -- 2:15PM, ruttentud wrote:

"I don't like X, they should remove it."
"I like X, they should keep it."
"They should replace X with Y."
"Anybody that likes X is dumb. Y is better."
"Why don't they include both X and Y."
"Yeah, everybody can be happy then!"
"But I don't like X, they should remove it."
"X really needs to be replaced with Y."
"But they can include both X and Y."
"But I don't like X, they need to remove it."
"Remove X, I don't like it."

Repeat.

Obstinance?

Jul 4, 2012 -- 6:32PM, greatfrito wrote:

Until you've had an in-law tell you your choice of game was stupid, and just Warcraft on paper, and dumbed down for dumber players who can't handle a real RPG, you haven't lived.

You haven't lived.

Jul 15, 2012 -- 11:19AM, wrecan wrote:

Lady and gentlemen.... I present to you the Edition War without Contrition, the War of the Web, the Mighty Match-up!

We're using standard edition war rules.  No posts of substance.  Do not read the other person's posts with comprehension.  Make frequent comparison to video games, MMOs, and CCGs.  Use the words "fallacy" and "straw man", incorrectly and often.  Passive aggressiveness gets you extra points and asking misleading and inflammatory questions is mandatory.  If you're getting tired, just declare victory and leave the thread.  Wait for the buzzer... and....

One, two, three, four, I declare Edition War
Five, six, seven eight, I use the web to

Go!

Aug 5, 2012 -- 8:28PM, Rustmonster wrote:

D&D should not return to the days of blindfolding the DM and players. No tips on encounter power? No mention of expected party roles? No true meaning of level due to different level charts or tiered classes? Please, let's not sacrifice clear, helpful rules guidelines in favour of catering to the delicate sensibilities of the few who have problems with the ascetics of anything other than what they are familiar with.


Sep 14, 2012 -- 2:52PM, Grizley wrote:

Just a quick note on the MMORPG as an insult comparison...

MMORPGs, raking in money by the dumptruck full.  Many options, tons of fans across many audiences, massive resources allocated to development.

TTRPGs, dying product.  Squeaking out an existence that relys on low cost.  Fans fit primarily into a few small demographics.  R&D budgets small, often rushed to market and patched after deployment.

You're not really making much of an argument when you compare something to a MMORPG and assume people think that means bad.  Lets face it, they make the money, have the audience and the budget.  We here on this board are fans of TTRPGs but lets not try to pretend none of us play MMORPGs.


Nov 14, 2012 -- 8:11AM, Mand12 wrote:

Adding options at the system level is good.
Adding options at the table level is hard.

Removing options at the system level is bad.
Removing options at the table level is easy.

This is not complicated.


Mar 7, 2013 -- 6:57PM, Alter_Boy wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 2:23PM, EnglishLanguage wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 1:52PM, Rory wrote:

Something like Tactical Shift is more magical than martial healing.


Telling someone to move over a few feet is magical now? :|

I weep for this generation.



Given the laziness and morbid obsesity amongst D&Ders, being able to convince someone to get on their feet, do some heavy exercise, and use their words to make them be healthier must seem magical. 


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 16, 2013 - 9:56PM #164
GROMkill
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2011
Posts: 448

Jan 15, 2013 -- 6:32PM, LordManshoon wrote:

@GROMkill - Go for it. I like the sound of it.

After GROMkill is ready, I will update.




Sorry, my mid-week is very busy. Posting right now.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 3:32PM #165
LordManshoon
Date Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Posts: 3,969
Update will be coming tomorrow. I would do it tonight, but I will give Pash and Walrus one last chance to post before we speed things up.
My Sig Show
Reality is but the sum total of all illusions.
Proud Hand of Karsus, now and forever
Mess with one Hand, mess with 'em all
I am Blue/Green
I am Blue/Green
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

"just do what LM the lord of magical might does, and you'll be fine" - sfdragon, 10/12/09


My Ravnican Loyalties Show


Board Snippets Show

Jul 3, 2012 -- 2:15PM, ruttentud wrote:

"I don't like X, they should remove it."
"I like X, they should keep it."
"They should replace X with Y."
"Anybody that likes X is dumb. Y is better."
"Why don't they include both X and Y."
"Yeah, everybody can be happy then!"
"But I don't like X, they should remove it."
"X really needs to be replaced with Y."
"But they can include both X and Y."
"But I don't like X, they need to remove it."
"Remove X, I don't like it."

Repeat.

Obstinance?

Jul 4, 2012 -- 6:32PM, greatfrito wrote:

Until you've had an in-law tell you your choice of game was stupid, and just Warcraft on paper, and dumbed down for dumber players who can't handle a real RPG, you haven't lived.

You haven't lived.

Jul 15, 2012 -- 11:19AM, wrecan wrote:

Lady and gentlemen.... I present to you the Edition War without Contrition, the War of the Web, the Mighty Match-up!

We're using standard edition war rules.  No posts of substance.  Do not read the other person's posts with comprehension.  Make frequent comparison to video games, MMOs, and CCGs.  Use the words "fallacy" and "straw man", incorrectly and often.  Passive aggressiveness gets you extra points and asking misleading and inflammatory questions is mandatory.  If you're getting tired, just declare victory and leave the thread.  Wait for the buzzer... and....

One, two, three, four, I declare Edition War
Five, six, seven eight, I use the web to

Go!

Aug 5, 2012 -- 8:28PM, Rustmonster wrote:

D&D should not return to the days of blindfolding the DM and players. No tips on encounter power? No mention of expected party roles? No true meaning of level due to different level charts or tiered classes? Please, let's not sacrifice clear, helpful rules guidelines in favour of catering to the delicate sensibilities of the few who have problems with the ascetics of anything other than what they are familiar with.


Sep 14, 2012 -- 2:52PM, Grizley wrote:

Just a quick note on the MMORPG as an insult comparison...

MMORPGs, raking in money by the dumptruck full.  Many options, tons of fans across many audiences, massive resources allocated to development.

TTRPGs, dying product.  Squeaking out an existence that relys on low cost.  Fans fit primarily into a few small demographics.  R&D budgets small, often rushed to market and patched after deployment.

You're not really making much of an argument when you compare something to a MMORPG and assume people think that means bad.  Lets face it, they make the money, have the audience and the budget.  We here on this board are fans of TTRPGs but lets not try to pretend none of us play MMORPGs.


Nov 14, 2012 -- 8:11AM, Mand12 wrote:

Adding options at the system level is good.
Adding options at the table level is hard.

Removing options at the system level is bad.
Removing options at the table level is easy.

This is not complicated.


Mar 7, 2013 -- 6:57PM, Alter_Boy wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 2:23PM, EnglishLanguage wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 1:52PM, Rory wrote:

Something like Tactical Shift is more magical than martial healing.


Telling someone to move over a few feet is magical now? :|

I weep for this generation.



Given the laziness and morbid obsesity amongst D&Ders, being able to convince someone to get on their feet, do some heavy exercise, and use their words to make them be healthier must seem magical. 


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Feb 02, 2013 - 2:38PM #166
LordManshoon
Date Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Posts: 3,969
Update is go.

Pash and Walrus have posted elsewhere on these boards, so I hope to hear from them soon.
My Sig Show
Reality is but the sum total of all illusions.
Proud Hand of Karsus, now and forever
Mess with one Hand, mess with 'em all
I am Blue/Green
I am Blue/Green
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

"just do what LM the lord of magical might does, and you'll be fine" - sfdragon, 10/12/09


My Ravnican Loyalties Show


Board Snippets Show

Jul 3, 2012 -- 2:15PM, ruttentud wrote:

"I don't like X, they should remove it."
"I like X, they should keep it."
"They should replace X with Y."
"Anybody that likes X is dumb. Y is better."
"Why don't they include both X and Y."
"Yeah, everybody can be happy then!"
"But I don't like X, they should remove it."
"X really needs to be replaced with Y."
"But they can include both X and Y."
"But I don't like X, they need to remove it."
"Remove X, I don't like it."

Repeat.

Obstinance?

Jul 4, 2012 -- 6:32PM, greatfrito wrote:

Until you've had an in-law tell you your choice of game was stupid, and just Warcraft on paper, and dumbed down for dumber players who can't handle a real RPG, you haven't lived.

You haven't lived.

Jul 15, 2012 -- 11:19AM, wrecan wrote:

Lady and gentlemen.... I present to you the Edition War without Contrition, the War of the Web, the Mighty Match-up!

We're using standard edition war rules.  No posts of substance.  Do not read the other person's posts with comprehension.  Make frequent comparison to video games, MMOs, and CCGs.  Use the words "fallacy" and "straw man", incorrectly and often.  Passive aggressiveness gets you extra points and asking misleading and inflammatory questions is mandatory.  If you're getting tired, just declare victory and leave the thread.  Wait for the buzzer... and....

One, two, three, four, I declare Edition War
Five, six, seven eight, I use the web to

Go!

Aug 5, 2012 -- 8:28PM, Rustmonster wrote:

D&D should not return to the days of blindfolding the DM and players. No tips on encounter power? No mention of expected party roles? No true meaning of level due to different level charts or tiered classes? Please, let's not sacrifice clear, helpful rules guidelines in favour of catering to the delicate sensibilities of the few who have problems with the ascetics of anything other than what they are familiar with.


Sep 14, 2012 -- 2:52PM, Grizley wrote:

Just a quick note on the MMORPG as an insult comparison...

MMORPGs, raking in money by the dumptruck full.  Many options, tons of fans across many audiences, massive resources allocated to development.

TTRPGs, dying product.  Squeaking out an existence that relys on low cost.  Fans fit primarily into a few small demographics.  R&D budgets small, often rushed to market and patched after deployment.

You're not really making much of an argument when you compare something to a MMORPG and assume people think that means bad.  Lets face it, they make the money, have the audience and the budget.  We here on this board are fans of TTRPGs but lets not try to pretend none of us play MMORPGs.


Nov 14, 2012 -- 8:11AM, Mand12 wrote:

Adding options at the system level is good.
Adding options at the table level is hard.

Removing options at the system level is bad.
Removing options at the table level is easy.

This is not complicated.


Mar 7, 2013 -- 6:57PM, Alter_Boy wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 2:23PM, EnglishLanguage wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 1:52PM, Rory wrote:

Something like Tactical Shift is more magical than martial healing.


Telling someone to move over a few feet is magical now? :|

I weep for this generation.



Given the laziness and morbid obsesity amongst D&Ders, being able to convince someone to get on their feet, do some heavy exercise, and use their words to make them be healthier must seem magical. 


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Feb 02, 2013 - 9:40PM #167
TheWalrus42
Date Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Posts: 974
Sorry for the delay. Also, I think I know who the real enemy here is...
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 14, 2013 - 3:16PM #168
LordManshoon
Date Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Posts: 3,969
I had hoped to put out an update yesterday, but got delayed, and with today being Valentine's, I'm lucky I have time for this post. But we will be moving forward this weekend (probably tmrw), just as a heads-up to everyone.
My Sig Show
Reality is but the sum total of all illusions.
Proud Hand of Karsus, now and forever
Mess with one Hand, mess with 'em all
I am Blue/Green
I am Blue/Green
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

"just do what LM the lord of magical might does, and you'll be fine" - sfdragon, 10/12/09


My Ravnican Loyalties Show


Board Snippets Show

Jul 3, 2012 -- 2:15PM, ruttentud wrote:

"I don't like X, they should remove it."
"I like X, they should keep it."
"They should replace X with Y."
"Anybody that likes X is dumb. Y is better."
"Why don't they include both X and Y."
"Yeah, everybody can be happy then!"
"But I don't like X, they should remove it."
"X really needs to be replaced with Y."
"But they can include both X and Y."
"But I don't like X, they need to remove it."
"Remove X, I don't like it."

Repeat.

Obstinance?

Jul 4, 2012 -- 6:32PM, greatfrito wrote:

Until you've had an in-law tell you your choice of game was stupid, and just Warcraft on paper, and dumbed down for dumber players who can't handle a real RPG, you haven't lived.

You haven't lived.

Jul 15, 2012 -- 11:19AM, wrecan wrote:

Lady and gentlemen.... I present to you the Edition War without Contrition, the War of the Web, the Mighty Match-up!

We're using standard edition war rules.  No posts of substance.  Do not read the other person's posts with comprehension.  Make frequent comparison to video games, MMOs, and CCGs.  Use the words "fallacy" and "straw man", incorrectly and often.  Passive aggressiveness gets you extra points and asking misleading and inflammatory questions is mandatory.  If you're getting tired, just declare victory and leave the thread.  Wait for the buzzer... and....

One, two, three, four, I declare Edition War
Five, six, seven eight, I use the web to

Go!

Aug 5, 2012 -- 8:28PM, Rustmonster wrote:

D&D should not return to the days of blindfolding the DM and players. No tips on encounter power? No mention of expected party roles? No true meaning of level due to different level charts or tiered classes? Please, let's not sacrifice clear, helpful rules guidelines in favour of catering to the delicate sensibilities of the few who have problems with the ascetics of anything other than what they are familiar with.


Sep 14, 2012 -- 2:52PM, Grizley wrote:

Just a quick note on the MMORPG as an insult comparison...

MMORPGs, raking in money by the dumptruck full.  Many options, tons of fans across many audiences, massive resources allocated to development.

TTRPGs, dying product.  Squeaking out an existence that relys on low cost.  Fans fit primarily into a few small demographics.  R&D budgets small, often rushed to market and patched after deployment.

You're not really making much of an argument when you compare something to a MMORPG and assume people think that means bad.  Lets face it, they make the money, have the audience and the budget.  We here on this board are fans of TTRPGs but lets not try to pretend none of us play MMORPGs.


Nov 14, 2012 -- 8:11AM, Mand12 wrote:

Adding options at the system level is good.
Adding options at the table level is hard.

Removing options at the system level is bad.
Removing options at the table level is easy.

This is not complicated.


Mar 7, 2013 -- 6:57PM, Alter_Boy wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 2:23PM, EnglishLanguage wrote:

Mar 7, 2013 -- 1:52PM, Rory wrote:

Something like Tactical Shift is more magical than martial healing.


Telling someone to move over a few feet is magical now? :|

I weep for this generation.



Given the laziness and morbid obsesity amongst D&Ders, being able to convince someone to get on their feet, do some heavy exercise, and use their words to make them be healthier must seem magical. 


Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 14, 2013 - 4:35PM #169
TheWalrus42
Date Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Posts: 974
Alrighty.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 14, 2013 - 10:29PM #170
CALEBROBERTS
Date Joined: Mar 11, 2010
Posts: 3,666
cools
Play by Post Haven  Stop by, join us, and sign up for some games while you are there
Real Adventures  Come join in and have some adventures, real ones!

Want even more Play-By-Post games?
Head over to www.Nerdbound.com to check some more out.  People there are playing lots of systems, not just D&D

PCs Show
Big John Barleycorn Show
Big John Barleycorn

Big John Barleycorn, Level 5
Human, Knight
Human Power Selection Option: Heroic Effort
Languages: Common, Dwarven
Theme: Mercenary

VITALS
AC: 25 Fort: 19 Ref: 15 Will: 17
HP: 38/54

Surges: 8/11
Surge Value: 13

Initiative: +8
Speed: 5

CURRENT ABILITY SCORES
STR 19, CON 15, DEX 11, INT 10, WIS 15, CHA 8

[] Action Point
     Milestone: 1/2
[] Second Wind

TRAINED SKILLS
Athletics +9, Endurance +7, Heal +9, Intimidate +8

UNTRAINED SKILLS
Acrobatics +0, Arcana +2, Bluff +1, Diplomacy +1, Dungeoneering +4, History +2, Insight +4, Nature +4, Perception +4, Religion +2, Stealth +0, Streetwise +3, Thievery +0

POWERS
Standard Action
Melee Basic Attack
   Vicious Longsword +1: +12 vs AC, 1d8+6 damage
   Khopesh: +10 vs AC, 1d8+5 damage (Brutal 1)
Ranged Basic Attack
   Javelin (10/20): +10 vs AC, 1d6+5 damage

Minor Action
> Active < Knight Feature: Defender Aura
Knight Feature: Battle Guardian
> - < Fighter Utility: Defend the Line Stance
> - < Fighter Utility: Hammer Hands Stance
[] Level 2 Utility: Glowering Threat

No Action
[] Human Racial Power: Heroic Effort
[X] Mercenary Theme Power: Takedown Strike
[][] Attack Power: Power Strike

FEATS
Class Feat: Shield Finesse
Racial Bonus Feat: Master at Arms
Level 1: World Serpent's Grasp
Level 2: Improve Initiative
Level 4: Superior Will

ITEMS
Longsword +1
Khopesh
Shield of Protection
     [] Item Daily Power
Delver's Plate Armor +2
     [] Item Daily Power
Javelin x3
Adventurer's Kit
1 Opal
235g 172s 50c
Tsubasa Shou Show
Tsubasa Shou iplay4e link

Tsubasa Shou, level 2
Human Euphoric Ardent
Theme: Windlord
Languages: Common, Elven
Origin: Elemental

VITALS
AC: 19 Fort: 16 Ref: 14 Will: 18
HP: 32/32
Power Points: [][]

Surges: 6/9
Surge Value: 8

Initiative: +2
Speed: 5

CURRENT ABILITY SCORES
STR 13, CON 15, DEX 13, INT 8, WIS 10, CHA 18

[X][ Action Point
      Milestone: 1/2
[] Second Wind

TRAINED SKILLS
Athletics +9,  Diplomacy +10, Endurance +8, Heal +6, Intimidate +10

UNTRAINED SKILLS
Acrobatics +4, Arcana +0, Bluff +5, Dungeoneering +1, History +0, Insight +1, Nature +1, Religion +0, Stealth +2, Streetwise +5, Thievery +2

POWERS

Standard Action
Melee Basic Attack
     Greatspear: +7 vs AC, 1d10+2 damage
Human At-Will Attack  (Augment 0 only): Focusing Strike
At-Will Attack: Demoralizing Strike
At-Will Attack: Energizing Strike
[]Encounter Attack: Wind Fury Assault
[] Daily Attack: Battleborn Acuity

Move Action

Minor Action
[][] Encounter Utility: Ardent Surge

Immediate Reaction
[] Daily Utility: Healing Bond

No Action
[]Encounter Utility: Ardent Outrage

FEATS
Bonus Feat: Improved Defenses
Human bonus Feat: Polearm Expertise
Level 1: Weapon Proficiency: Greatspear
Level 2: Armor Proficiency: Scale

ITEMS
Magic Scale Armor +1
Flute
Silk Rope - 50 ft
Torch x2
Sunrod
Lantern
Oil (pint) x3
Tent
Bedroll
Backpack
Trail Rations x 10
Grappling Hook
Climber's Kit
Flint & Steel

0 g - 0 s - 0 c
Reznik Callahan Show
iPlay4e link

Reznik Callahan, Level 1
Human (Elf), Ranger/Druid
Languages: Common, Elven
Theme: Werewolf

CURRENT STATUS:

VITALS
AC: 17  Fort: 12  Ref: 15  Will: 14
HP: 25/25

Surges: 6/7
Surge Value: 6

Initiative: +4
Speed: 7

CURRENT ABILITY SCORES
STR 10, CON 13, DEX 18, INT 8, WIS 18, CHA 11

[X][] Action Point
     Milestone: 2/2
[] Second Wind

TRAINED SKILLS
Athletics +4, Nature +13, Perception +11, Stealth +9

UNTRAINED SKILLS
Acrobatics +3, Arcana -1, Bluff +0, Diplomacy +0, Dungeoneering +4, Endurance +0, Heal +4, History -1, Insight +4, Intimidate +2, Religion -1, Streetwise +0, Thievery +3

POWERS
Standard Action
At-Will Attack Twin Strike
At-Will Attack Savage Rend
At-Will Attack Wolf Shape Attack: Useable only in Wolf Form
[] Encounter Attack Two-Fanged Strike
[X] Daily Attack Sure Shot

Minor Action
At-Will Utility Hunter's Quarry
At-Will Utility Wild Shape
[] Encounter Utility Wolf Shape

Free Action
[X]Encounter Utility Elven Accuracy

FEATS
Level 1: Versatile Expertise
          Bow Expertise
          Totem Expertise

ITEMS
Longbow
Hide Armor
Short Sword
Totem
Cold Weather Clothing
Adventurer's Kit
Bharhas Show
iplay4e sheet

Bharhas, Level 3
Human, Warlord | Sorcerer
Human Power Selection Option: Bonus At-Will power
Languages: Common, Elven
Theme: Gladiator

CURRENT STATUS:
Phase of the Sun:
*At the start of your turn, each enemy adjacent to you takes fire and radiant damage equal to your Strength modifier.
*You also gain resist 5 cold.

VITALS
AC: 18 Fort: 18 Ref: 15 Will: 17
HP: 40/40

Surges: 6/6
Surge Value: 10

Initiative: +1
Speed: 6

CURRENT ABILITY SCORES
STR 18, CON 10, DEX 11, INT 10, WIS 8, CHA 17

[] Action Point
     Milestone: 1/2
[] Second Wind

TRAINED SKILLS
Athletics +8, Bluff +9, Diplomacy +9, Intimidate +9

UNTRAINED SKILLS
Acrobatics -1, Arcana +1,  Dungeoneering +0, Endurance -1, Heal +0, History +1, Insight +0, Nature +0, Perception +0, Religion +1, Stealth -1, Streetwise +4, Thievery -1

POWERS
Standard Action
Melee Basic Attack
   Longsword : +9 vs AC, 1d8+5 damage
   Katar: +9 vs AC, 1d6+4 damage
Warlord Attack: Wolf Pack Tactics
Warlord Attack: Viper's Strike
Sorcerer Attack: Storm Walk
[] Gladiator Theme Attack: Disrupting Advance
[] Level 1 Warlord Attack: Diabolic Stratagem
[] Level 1 Sorcerer Attack: Cosmos Call

Minor Action
[] Level 2 Warlord Utility: Shake It Off
[] Level 3 Sorcerer Attack: Lightning Cuts
[] Warlord Feature: Inspiring Word

Free Action
Dark Sun Arcane Feature: Arcane Defiling

No Action
[] Warlord Feature: Battlefront Shift

FEATS
Racial Bonus Feat: Mastery of Knives
Level 1: Hybrid Talent
Level 2: Sorcerous Blade Channeling 

ITEMS
Longsword
Katar
Cloth Armor of Sudden Recovery +1
     [] Item Daily Power
Heavy Shield
Cloak of Distortion
Adventurer's Kit
Survival Day x10
427g
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 17 of 21  •  Prev 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing