Community

Jun 16, 2013 -- 8:05PM, crimson_vampr wrote:

Don't mistake me, I'm being nice, just practical as well.

Very few holy symbols would have properties that could benefit you if you're not using them to make attacks. Though I'll concede there are a few.

It just makes better sense to allow those who will get the most use out of them to have the first choice of them. If Dredge can use it for attacking as well as use the benefit, he should get to carry it. Same as with Gyrdian (though it only matters in this case, since we could choose the type of implement, I'm no longer proficient with holy symbols since I stopped being a vampire).

Our goal as a party is to assign magic items to the character it is best fitted to. If that means we find a holy symbol best given to Zanager, or if you want to buy one at some point, then you'll get a holy symbol. MY apologies for not including you in my initial assessment of where to assign the implement, it just seemed likely to be of less use to Zanager than it would have been to Dredge or Gyrdian.

Orbin, go ahead and add the +2 Holy Symbol to your sheet, I'll add the +1 Symbol of Battle to the party treasure. (No offense to Zanager here either, but the power on this one requires you to use the symbol in your attack. I don't think you have a use for that, do you? )

Uhhh,... I wasn't asking nor discussing obtaining the magic implement +2.

I was reminding you for anymore future comments that you was overlooking the cavalier profiiency with an implement as well as replying to Astromath questions on what we going do with the item, doing so with reasns why I chosen to pass up on it.

You responses is like if I have I say something entirely different which is why I was wondering and have asked "why can't you be nice?" in a casual, friendly way.

But I apologizesfor  I understand what I done wrong in the response and in the future will skip adding the fluff when I'm addressing you until I feel that you accept whole-heartly that all I'm is friendly.

Jun 16, 2013 -- 8:17PM, VoyRager wrote:

Uhhh,... I wasn't asking nor discussing obtaining the magic implement +2.

I was reminding you for anymore future comments that you was overlooking the cavalier profiiency with an implement as well as replying to Astromath questions on what we going do with the item, doing so with reasns why I chosen to pass up on it.

You responses is like if I have I say something entirely different which is why I was wondering and have asked "why can't you be nice?" in a casual, friendly way.

But I apologizesfor  I understand what I done wrong in the response and in the future will skip adding the fluff when I'm addressing you until I feel that you accept whole-heartly that all I'm is friendly.

My apologies again, I wanted to explain that I was trying to be nice and that I wasn't actively trying to exclude you from the decision making of where the magic item would be placed. My intentions and tone are much harder to convey in a typed setting than when face to face. I honestly don't want there to be any hard feelings as we progress through the game together. Which is why I went into so much detail there and added all the emoticons, hoping to clarify my tones.

Jun 16, 2013 -- 1:59PM, Brys wrote:

Lorenz wil use 1 surge during the short rest.  He has no interest in the magic item.

Lorenz already posted his. We're good to go!