Because I don't want to see this column go, I'm going to be selfish and ask you to write another couple entries. We have learned a bunch about Iomandra, but I'm extremely curious about the type of campaign you are considering running next. Therefore, I would really appreciate you giving us some insight into the themes that are getting you excited for the next go around. I think this would be the perfect "intermission" for you column, as I refuse to believe you have run out of topics...
View full commentBecause I don't want to see this column go, I'm going to be selfish and ask you to write another couple entries.
We have learned a bunch about Iomandra, but I'm extremely curious about the type of campaign you are considering running next. Therefore, I would really appreciate you giving us some insight into the themes that are getting you excited for the next go around.
I think this would be the perfect "intermission" for you column, as I refuse to believe you have run out of topics to talk about forever.
If you are truly finished, then I would suggest WotC begins a new column where each week you have a different employee talk about a memorable campaign, adventure, or encounter they have run or played in; it's these stories that help inspire us all.
I have few words that can do my thoughts justice, but I'd like to try. Very simply, Dungeon Mastering is the reason I can feel "okay" in this place, and your words are the reason I am a Dungeon Master. I don't think I can ever thank you enough for that. Appreciated. - Barker
View full commentI have few words that can do my thoughts justice, but I'd like to try. Very simply, Dungeon Mastering is the reason I can feel "okay" in this place, and your words are the reason I am a Dungeon Master. I don't think I can ever thank you enough for that.
Should all elves be the same body type? No, of course not. Should some elves be fat? Yes. But What is fat for an elf? It isn't the same as what is fat for a human or a dwarf. An Obese elf may well have a similar body type to a plump human. Just look at real world animals... I'll use different breeds of dogs for examples. A fat greyhound isn't very fat compared to a bulldog. .. it is still fat for its breed but the "natural" body shape of a greyhound is so thin to begin with that...
View full commentShould all elves be the same body type? No, of course not. Should some elves be fat? Yes. But What is fat for an elf? It isn't the same as what is fat for a human or a dwarf. An Obese elf may well have a similar body type to a plump human.
Just look at real world animals... I'll use different breeds of dogs for examples. A fat greyhound isn't very fat compared to a bulldog. .. it is still fat for its breed but the "natural" body shape of a greyhound is so thin to begin with that the scale is very different.
So Elves should have a range of body types from thin (which would appear dangerously anorexic for a human... apart from the bones not poking out so much) to fat (which would look slightly overweight for a human). If you really want to display dangerous weight catagories then you could go further... but I don't think those kinds of weights should be commonly depicted.
I would love to see variations in bodytypes among all non-humans, not just the standards like dwarve and elf. I think the tendency to label any somewhat significant variation a subtype to be kinda ridiculous. Races should be allowed some realistic variation while still being consider part of the same group of elves or lizardmen. consideration should always be taken to what their specific race ideal is though, lest they lose the uniqueness that makes them an identifiably non-human race. ...
View full commentI would love to see variations in bodytypes among all non-humans, not just the standards like dwarve and elf. I think the tendency to label any somewhat significant variation a subtype to be kinda ridiculous. Races should be allowed some realistic variation while still being consider part of the same group of elves or lizardmen. consideration should always be taken to what their specific race ideal is though, lest they lose the uniqueness that makes them an identifiably non-human race.
As for monster variation, I would adore seeing more of that. I'd actually like the regional owlbear thing. I like the feeling of a worldwide setting with all manner of creatures adapted to all manner of biomes.
The important part for any undead is a focus on the "rule of three". Why are they undead. What is their desire. How do they naturally expire. Zombies, skeletons, and ghouls are most often times made by necromancers, gods or very corrupt magical areas. Their desires are what their master bids or wonton destruction and death "mindless murder" being the key. They all expire when the magic or power that made them expires. Vampires liches are different in that they either choose or resolve that...
View full commentThe important part for any undead is a focus on the "rule of three". Why are they undead. What is their desire. How do they naturally expire. Zombies, skeletons, and ghouls are most often times made by necromancers, gods or very corrupt magical areas. Their desires are what their master bids or wonton destruction and death "mindless murder" being the key. They all expire when the magic or power that made them expires. Vampires liches are different in that they either choose or resolve that their existence is as such. They are intelligent in their desires and goals. Vampires will die without blood but other then that will continue for eternity. Liches will continue on until their souls are destroyed. Mummy's wraths and wraiths are the guardians and the plagues of areas. A mummy being created for protection. A wrath being created for destruction. A wraith being created for revenge. They all expire when their mission is completed.
As for the argument on energy drain. Health and hit points have always represented two things to me, blood in the body and physical damage taken. Energy drain with the draining component should not focus on restoring what these creatures care nothing about. They should bolster the vigor of the undead creature making a wrath even more angry and full of rage. With the example of Snow White, the drain allowed the queen to focus on her beauty and extending her life... A wrath might energy drain a particularly hearty guard or civilian to allow his muscles to sustain the wear and tear that killing hundreds of humans would cause to humanoid body.
If a Wight or Wraith kills a living being that being becomes a Wight or Wraith but it does NOT have the ability to create any more of its kind. AKA they are a lesser Wight or Wraith. It keeps the threat of being turned into something so horrible but stops the perpetuation craziness.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for going back to single issue pdf's. I hated the single article format. It took 10 times longer to open them all up and view them if I wanted to read them all. I understand some like only one or two articles but they can easily download the entire issue and extract whatever they want and discard the rest.
For me Goblins should be like the ones depicted as in the Magic the Gathering universe. For the little ones, The Goblin Marauder, Goblin War Strike or Goblin Psychopath by Pete Venters, maybe like The Goblin Brawler by Heather Hudson or The Goblin Warchief by Tim Hildebrandt, One of my favorites is the painting art for the "Goblin Elite Infantry" by Robert Bliss. They look mean and badass! Long pointy ears with long and sharp nose; guess this model would fill the Hobgoblin, just add...
View full commentFor me Goblins should be like the ones depicted as in the Magic the Gathering universe.
For the little ones, The Goblin Marauder, Goblin War Strike or Goblin Psychopath by Pete Venters, maybe like The Goblin Brawler by Heather Hudson or The Goblin Warchief by Tim Hildebrandt,
One of my favorites is the painting art for the "Goblin Elite Infantry" by Robert Bliss. They look mean and badass! Long pointy ears with long and sharp nose; guess this model would fill the Hobgoblin, just add a light tan brown skin, some scalemail and helmets ;)
In my opinion, Bugbears should look, hulky and more bear-ly, not so fit... Bugbear Footpath or Bugbear Gang Leader from the D&D minis for example.
Lots of things were broken about it, but tons of people absolutely *loved* it anyway, because but made it practical to achieve all sorts of character concepts you could never have made otherwise. So if they can design an *optional* system that has built in mechanics for fixing game balance issues while still giving folks the things they love about having that flexibility, as far as I'm concerned, that's the best of both worlds. But already in Next, you can do a lot of things with...
View full commentLots of things were broken about it, but tons of people absolutely *loved* it anyway, because but made it practical to achieve all sorts of character concepts you could never have made otherwise. So if they can design an *optional* system that has built in mechanics for fixing game balance issues while still giving folks the things they love about having that flexibility, as far as I'm concerned, that's the best of both worlds.
But already in Next, you can do a lot of things with specialties that required multiclassing in 3e, so hopefully it will be much more rare, even when allowed.
Actually, with separate advancement rules for multiclass characters, it sounds like a compromise with hybrids -- much more flexible than just playing a hybrid (you many more degrees you can use to balance your mixture of classes), but much more level-scaled than 3E, which resembles a hybrid.
I've waffled a bit... ultimately I'm leaning towards the classic greek minotaur (bull head, human body) but I'm honestly somewhat neutral about the feet, I don't feel to strongly about the legs and hips. (but if the hips are human, no tail - while the inverse is not necessarily true - furry hips and no tail is fine with me) But, by the time you get to udders you've gone from minotaur, to cow humanoid. Also, I'm sure people have pointed out that there are reasonable arguments for why a...
View full commentI've waffled a bit... ultimately I'm leaning towards the classic greek minotaur (bull head, human body) but I'm honestly somewhat neutral about the feet, I don't feel to strongly about the legs and hips. (but if the hips are human, no tail - while the inverse is not necessarily true - furry hips and no tail is fine with me)
But, by the time you get to udders you've gone from minotaur, to cow humanoid. Also, I'm sure people have pointed out that there are reasonable arguments for why a humanoid mammal would have breasts.
This does not equate to the issue of dragonborn and lizard people with boobs - the issue there is that they are lizards. Two legs, four legs, no legs... lizards don't have tits. Birds also. But this is a mammal, and mammals have mammary glands.
I also agree with the style guidelines listed - great start! And Westerness has a great point: "rating" is still very subjective, and the US (presumably the biggest market) is quite prudish compared to many other first world countries. I think many have already said this but it's worth repeating: it's probably easiest to start with a slightly more prudish standard to push the broad-based appeal, and open up more risqué materials for those who want it. That seems to be the standard...
View full commentI also agree with the style guidelines listed - great start!
And Westerness has a great point: "rating" is still very subjective, and the US (presumably the biggest market) is quite prudish compared to many other first world countries. I think many have already said this but it's worth repeating: it's probably easiest to start with a slightly more prudish standard to push the broad-based appeal, and open up more risqué materials for those who want it. That seems to be the standard marketing approach, anyway: the trick is to make sure you don't make it too boring/sanitized or quash too much creative output.
This list sounds perfect. As far as the survey, I'm not sure which level to pick, but I'd like to see definite hints of "sexy" in D&D artwork. Cover most of the bum and bust (is that armor realistic), but you can definitely allude to them (and everything else is fair game). Give equal "sexy" treatment to males. Remember Hennet from 3.5? There's nothing wrong with some male chest. Focus on very expressive facial expressions. Accentuating the eyes also usually has good effect. In a fight...
View full commentThis list sounds perfect. As far as the survey, I'm not sure which level to pick, but I'd like to see definite hints of "sexy" in D&D artwork. Cover most of the bum and bust (is that armor realistic), but you can definitely allude to them (and everything else is fair game). Give equal "sexy" treatment to males. Remember Hennet from 3.5? There's nothing wrong with some male chest. Focus on very expressive facial expressions. Accentuating the eyes also usually has good effect. In a fight scene, don't be afraid of dirt on faces, messed up hair, even a little wounding (bruises, small amount of bleeding) etc. As far as being more creative with the "sexy" (clothes ripped off, people tied up, women pinning men down...), I want depictions to be true to context (would a battle or cult or woman warrior do that - then do it), but don't go so far that I'd be afraid of opening a book around pubescent children.
Also, consider how sexy non-traditionally sexy people can be? Something kind of fun that I incorporate into games and stories is the idea that a larger person, an amputee, a person with scars or a deformity (etc) can find himself/herself sexy or be paired with someone who finds them sexy. Through that perception, they can become as sexy as a more traditionally sexy character. It's about attitude (often expressed in the face/eyes/body posture).
Finally, in 3.5, some friends and I really wanted to see artwork that depicted adventurers on a good day. Why couldn't the adventurer's (of all sexes) go shopping and not get jumped just one time. Why not show some bro's helping each other don some armor? Why not show a nice campfire scene? Why not show an obvious romantic context (not a bedroom, but maybe 2 adventures look at each other for a few seconds too long)? Most scenes should be battle, but one or two vignettes of daily life could be fun too (& not just all of them at a bar or Mialee messing up a spell).
I like having some example unique items pre-made in the books. Especially some throw-backs and classics. But they're usually more of a jumping off point for me. I like to design my own items and I don't particularly care for rules (and a chapter thereof) to tell me how to do it "the right way". I generally disregard these rules and generate my ideas. My players enjoy the weapons, items, and artifact I create, and that's the important part. I work hard to make balanced items that don't break...
View full commentI like having some example unique items pre-made in the books. Especially some throw-backs and classics. But they're usually more of a jumping off point for me. I like to design my own items and I don't particularly care for rules (and a chapter thereof) to tell me how to do it "the right way". I generally disregard these rules and generate my ideas. My players enjoy the weapons, items, and artifact I create, and that's the important part. I work hard to make balanced items that don't break games. I give my players my own unique and personal parts of the game - often custom tailored for specific characters. I am not opposed to having guidelines, especially for newer DMs, but leave them at that, and drop the expectations for characters to upgrade their weapons like they do in console RPGs. It ruins the magic. No pun intended. Honestly.
First off, I like the Hit Dice mechanics for healing, and don’t have a problem with how HP’s are gained each level. Those are fine, but I think some of the other posters are right, just call ‘Hit Dice’ used for natural healing something else (surges, first aid, recovery dice, etc). ‘Hit Points’, as defined by M.Mearls, raises my hackles. Actually, it’s just a different way of saying ‘Wound Points’ and ‘Vitality Points’ like the Star Wars games. Which I liked, and they worked well, but...
View full commentFirst off, I like the Hit Dice mechanics for healing, and don’t have a problem with how HP’s are gained each level. Those are fine, but I think some of the other posters are right, just call ‘Hit Dice’ used for natural healing something else (surges, first aid, recovery dice, etc).
‘Hit Points’, as defined by M.Mearls, raises my hackles. Actually, it’s just a different way of saying ‘Wound Points’ and ‘Vitality Points’ like the Star Wars games. Which I liked, and they worked well, but it’s not how I see ‘Hit Points’ in DnD. Maybe I could even get behind your definition if it works well, except for this:
By stating that this is how you view ‘Hit Points’, and making that part of the Core system, you are taking away how I see ‘Hit Points’ and replacing them with your version. I don’t want you telling me how to play a class, or what roles a class should fill. So don’t try and tell me how I should view ‘Hit Points’, either.
Also, it ties into another problem with DnDNext that, as I understand it, is still being worked on. That is the Armor situation. People take M.Mearls definition of ‘Hit Points’ and use it to rationalize why Armor makes PC’s harder to hit, rather than provides protection from damage. I don’t like that Armor works like that in DnD, and always house-rule it differently. So don’t force your definition of ‘Hit Points’ on me, because I have more than one reason to ignore it.
We have learned a bunch about Iomandra, but I'm extremely curious about the type of campaign you are considering running next. Therefore, I would really appreciate you giving us some insight into the themes that are getting you excited for the next go around.
I think this would be the perfect "intermission" for you column, as I refuse to believe you have run out of topics...
View full comment
Appreciated.
- Barker
View full comment