Community

Actually WW has had several T8's this year, but they were all in the spring.  Since then I have really not even seen it played in PEs, so it's not like it has been a deck trying to get there that keeps failing.  It seems people just stopped playing it.  Maybe because it is not good maybe because people don't like it, I have no idea.

However, MBC is a deck I see people play far more often and for all of the attempts it has 1x 7th place finish which is not all the impressive to me.  The deck is just very unreliable and has a hard time dealing with the threats that the format throws as it.  I definitely don't think WW is the strongest deck either, but it is better than MBC in my opinion.

Random card- Sacred Mesa.  I saw someone mention this a while ago, is it in any decks?  Also, are we/you playing Lightning Greaves?

My thoughts on WW (and it's low power level):

The deck has to be very aggressive to win (losing any creatures, including mid-top curve guys like Baneslayer and Ranger of Eos hurt).  If you think WW should not be playing 4-5 drops, then I wish you luck winning with (essentially) only 2/2s for 2.

The opponent cannot effectively stop the creature onslaught (as WW has little 'reach'- it needs creatures to win).

WW needs man lands to increase its threat density.  My WW lists play a TON of man-lands.  It also would like fetch lands to thin out the deck.

WW's only advantages over RG are increased playable token generators, numerous ways to augment creature size and flyers.  RG has better creatures (p/t-to-mana ratio wise) and burn. UG has better utility and the ability to say no.  WW just has a low power level. Compare it to the RG, Goblin and Elves lists- can it reliably beat any of these?

WW's removal is already thin.  Losing PtE and/or StP put it way behind. It gets even worse when you think about multi-purpose white cards like enlightened tutor- that can fetch removal, artifact kill, winter orb, equipment- but it is better suited in combo or control.

WW has so many appealing creatures, that you will have a hard time figuring out what is actually the best configuration.  I once had a WW deck (with clamp) that was 15-2 in 4mans/2mans.  While I won many of my games with clamp, i could never get an optimal creature base.  First strike, protection from x, flying, high powers and utility are all available in large amounts for WW. Good luck tuning a good mix even if you have lots of experience with them.

If you still want to try WW, overload it with multipurpose support spells (like Otherworldy Journey, Oblivion Ring and Harm's Way) and play a full contigent of Anthem effects- ALL OF THEM.  I'd also play a lot of guys with First Strike so you can defend against 5/5s while a few flyers swoop in turn after turn.

Thoughts after WW:

I would look into hypergenesis with a few duals (perhaps rav block), a few basics and a TON of landcycler creatures to keep the land count as close to 30 as possible.  Also, I would play all of the TSP charge lands not being used up by other decks. I would focus on playing 5-7cc creatures that can be cast if the opponent can answer the initial hypergenesis.  Don't play too many CIPT lands.

Elves- since this deck will lose some power(mostly in the form of some low end and white cards), I would have a healthy selection of 4-6 drop all-star creatures.  Vigor, Deus of Calamity, and Creakwood Liege all performed well in mono green. 

odds are I won't check the thread for a while.  catch me in-game if you need/want anything.  cheers!