Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 18 of 24  •  Prev 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 ... 24 Next
Switch to Forum Live View
Sticky: Discuss: LFR Meta-Org Guide v20110523
2 years ago  ::  Jun 08, 2011 - 8:19PM #171
Hibiki54
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2008
Posts: 1,103
I would officially like to start the Meta-Org "Knights of Cormyr".
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 09, 2011 - 5:20AM #172
Uthrac
Date Joined: Aug 10, 2007
Posts: 1,556

Jun 8, 2011 -- 8:19PM, Hibiki54 wrote:

I would officially like to start the Meta-Org "Knights of Cormyr".




I don't think non-admins can start meta-org, though you can officially start the Adventuring Company "Knights of Cormyr."  

Dan Anderson
@EpicUthrac
Living Forgotten Realms Calimshan Writing Director
Living Forgotten Realms Epic Writing Director

Meet me at TotalConfusion:
http://www.totalcon.com/RolePlaying.html
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 09, 2011 - 6:19AM #173
Mommy_was_an_Orc
Date Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Posts: 4,988

Jun 9, 2011 -- 5:20AM, Uthrac wrote:

Jun 8, 2011 -- 8:19PM, Hibiki54 wrote:

I would officially like to start the Meta-Org "Knights of Cormyr".




I don't think non-admins can start meta-org, though you can officially start the Adventuring Company "Knights of Cormyr."  




I thought Adventuring Companies were limited to non-WotC organizations? 

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 09, 2011 - 6:29AM #174
lorika
Date Joined: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1,550

Jun 9, 2011 -- 6:19AM, Mommy_was_an_Orc wrote:

Jun 9, 2011 -- 5:20AM, Uthrac wrote:

Jun 8, 2011 -- 8:19PM, Hibiki54 wrote:

I would officially like to start the Meta-Org "Knights of Cormyr".




I don't think non-admins can start meta-org, though you can officially start the Adventuring Company "Knights of Cormyr."  




I thought Adventuring Companies were limited to non-WotC organizations? 




From the draft MetaOrg document (sorry for the weird formatting):


Call it what you want, but watch your use of existing organizations. You can call your adventuring company a clan, a guild, a tribe, a family, a team, a sect, or whatever you like, but you cannot create an adventuring company that identifies itself as an existing organization in the FORGOTTEN REALMS. For example, you cannot call your adventuring company the Flaming Fists, since that organization already exists in and around Baldur’s Gate. However, you could call them Burning Justice and make their background up as a small team of righteous (lawful good requirement) adventurers that have joined the Flaming Fists (affiliation with Flaming Fists requirement) to bring order to Baldur’s Gate and the lands beyond. Consult the Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide and Forgotten Realms Player’s Guide for information on past and present organizations in the Realms.




 


So you could make an adventuring company with a requirement that you had to be a Knight of Cormyr, but you'd have to name it the "Defenders of Cormyr" or something else - you couldn't actually call the AdCo the "Knights of Cormyr" since that's an existing organization (at least, I'm assuming the knights of a kingdom would be considered an organization). 
Lori Anderson
WotC Freelancer, LFR author
@LittleLorika

CALI3-3 The Agony of Almraiven (co-author)
NETH4-1 Containing Shadow (co-author)
CALI4-1 Plain of Stone Spiders (author)
QUES4-1 Liberation (co-author)
EPIC5-1 Plaguewrought Prism (co-author)

TotalCon: http://www.totalcon.com/RolePlaying.html
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 09, 2011 - 6:47AM #175
Uthrac
Date Joined: Aug 10, 2007
Posts: 1,556
Depends - I believe the official title is "Purple Dragon Knights."

I agree that "Defenders of Cormyr" is probably a safer name, though. 
Dan Anderson
@EpicUthrac
Living Forgotten Realms Calimshan Writing Director
Living Forgotten Realms Epic Writing Director

Meet me at TotalConfusion:
http://www.totalcon.com/RolePlaying.html
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 09, 2011 - 7:40AM #176
Tedium
Date Joined: Jun 13, 2010
Posts: 633

Jun 9, 2011 -- 6:47AM, Uthrac wrote:

Depends - I believe the official title is "Purple Dragon Knights."

I agree that "Defenders of Cormyr" is probably a safer name, though. 




Barney's Battalion? "I love you, you love me, lets go kill some Netherese"

"I am the seeker, I am the stalker, I am the walrus"
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 09, 2011 - 10:01PM #177
Hibiki54
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2008
Posts: 1,103

Jun 9, 2011 -- 7:40AM, Tedium wrote:

Jun 9, 2011 -- 6:47AM, Uthrac wrote:

Depends - I believe the official title is "Purple Dragon Knights."

I agree that "Defenders of Cormyr" is probably a safer name, though. 




Barney's Battalion? "I love you, you love me, lets go kill some Netherese"




You now officially fail at life. Undecided

Considering that my PC was more than likely the ONLY Purple Dragon Knight (by Paragon Path) in LFR existance, Knights of Cormyr sounds much better as an official meta-org.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 10, 2011 - 10:38AM #178
kenobi65
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: May 6, 2001
Posts: 1,919

Jun 9, 2011 -- 10:01PM, Hibiki54 wrote:

Considering that my PC was more than likely the ONLY Purple Dragon Knight (by Paragon Path) in LFR existance,




Hate to disabuse you of this, but I've played with one, so not quite as unique as you think.

"Of course [Richard] has a knife.  He always has a knife.  We all have knives.  It's 1183, and we're barbarians!" - Eleanor of Aquitaine, "The Lion in Winter"
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 10, 2011 - 2:13PM #179
Joshua_Randall
Date Joined: Oct 7, 2003
Posts: 689
Purple Dragon Knight is actually a pretty darned good paragon path. So I wouldn't be surprised if there are more of them floating around than you think. It's a bit annoying that one of its attack powers uses Str and the other uses Cha, but there are ways around that.

Now, the Purple Dragon Commander's Ring? Yeah, that's pretty bad. (But flavorful.)
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 12, 2011 - 6:48AM #180
logopolis
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Jul 22, 2008
Posts: 1,924
Are meta-organizations officially in effect now?  The effective date is listed as June 1, but it's still a draft document.

I noticed that the Knights of Myth Drannor citizenship benefit is a bit unclear. Does it mean that a PC can (or must) change backgrounds?  Since the introduction only discusses citizenship as a requirement, I think it would make sense to move Myth Drannor citizenship to the requirements section of the meta-organization.

Also, it's a minor issue, but it would be good for the PDF table of contents to be fixed in the final version of the document. Currently, it looks like there is a table of contents entry for each paragraph.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 18 of 24  •  Prev 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 ... 24 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing