<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: LFR through 2014</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view/76817/29322845/LFR_through_2014</link><description>With the keynote at Gencon suggesting a 2014 Gencon debut of D&amp;D Next, does this mean LFR will end at Origins in 2014?</description><item><title>The main lesson I take away from this train-wreck is not to play in any future campaign that's run by the same people as this one.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view/76817/29322845/LFR_through_2014?post_id=532196767#532196767</link><description>The main lesson I take away from this train-wreck is not to play in any future campaign that's run by the same people as this one.</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 23:27:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Is there?  What elements that LFR introduced (that weren't, say, in LC or LG) do you consider admirable?Along our current discussion lines, LFR corrected various elements of cronyism and inconsistency. There were many players that felt hurt by this a</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view/76817/29322845/LFR_through_2014?post_id=524389877#524389877</link><description>Is there?  What elements that LFR introduced (that weren't, say, in LC or LG) do you consider admirable?Along our current discussion lines, LFR corrected various elements of cronyism and inconsistency. There were many players that felt hurt by this a</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:37:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>...and thats exactly the attitude that needed to die when LFR started. Great, the campaign was 'strong', as long as you knew the admins and got along well with them. Which basically meant that you went to a LOT of cons and/or played in the Admins hom</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view/76817/29322845/LFR_through_2014?post_id=524389299#524389299</link><description>...and thats exactly the attitude that needed to die when LFR started. Great, the campaign was 'strong', as long as you knew the admins and got along well with them. Which basically meant that you went to a LOT of cons and/or played in the Admins hom</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:16:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Or, more accurately, "This is your region, if you dont like the same PC classes and/or gods the triad of this region does, go play another game. You're not welcome to come join this private party." Having stories going on in in-game regions and encou</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view/76817/29322845/LFR_through_2014?post_id=524267863#524267863</link><description>Or, more accurately, "This is your region, if you dont like the same PC classes and/or gods the triad of this region does, go play another game. You're not welcome to come join this private party." Having stories going on in in-game regions and encou</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:11:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I have to disagree. It was also 'stronger' when you just were an average joe (as fast as adventurers go) and just swept along with whatever current drove your region.Just knowing that "this is your region, you're pretty much stuck there" meant that i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/lfr/go/thread/view/76817/29322845/LFR_through_2014?post_id=524224007#524224007</link><description>I have to disagree. It was also 'stronger' when you just were an average joe (as fast as adventurers go) and just swept along with whatever current drove your region.Just knowing that "this is your region, you're pretty much stuck there" meant that i</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:46:00 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
