Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
HMS Hood SA Question
2 years ago  ::  Jul 22, 2008 - 3:48PM #1
AH_Brass
Posts: 100
Date Joined: 04/14/07
  • Weakly-godlike AI
This question came up the other day and, never having used the Hood specifically because of this SA, I have no idea what the correct answer is.

Fatal Flaw - if an enemy Battleship rolls four 6s against this unit, put a face-down destroyed counter on this unit.


So, does this mean exactly four 6s and no more or at least four 6s? The fate of the universe hangs on the answer!



Well ... not really ...

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 22, 2008 - 6:56PM #2
Jolly-Roger
Posts: 330
Date Joined: 10/22/07
Around our sea scape it means when a Battleship Only rolls 4 or more natural sixes then the fatal flaw comes into effect.

Cruisers/Destroyers/etc cannot activate this effect.

Hope that helps.

Snippersly
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 23, 2008 - 1:31PM #3
AH_Brass
Posts: 100
Date Joined: 04/14/07
  • Weakly-godlike AI

Jolly-Roger wrote:

Around our sea scape it means when a Battleship Only rolls 4 or more natural sixes then the fatal flaw comes into effect.

Cruisers/Destroyers/etc cannot activate this effect.

Hope that helps.

Snippersly


That has always been my understanding as well but apparently some players, taking note of the fact that card doesn't say "four or more 6s", require that exactly four sixes be rolled. Frankly, since I think it's a stupid SA to begin with and the strict interpretation would make the Hood slightly more survivable, I'd like to discover that my understanding has been incorrect.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 24, 2008 - 12:44AM #4
AH_Richter_von_Manthofen
Posts: 1,272
Date Joined: 09/29/05
It would not make much difference as most BB attacks that have 5+ 6s also reach vital armor on the Hood - Result POOOOOFfffff
...,... and Rock'n Roll - but Minis are fun too...
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 24, 2008 - 11:04AM #5
AH_Brass
Posts: 100
Date Joined: 04/14/07
  • Weakly-godlike AI

AH_Richter von Manthofen wrote:

It would not make much difference as most BB attacks that have 5+ 6s also reach vital armor on the Hood - Result POOOOOFfffff


Well, yeah, assuming a bunch of 4s and 5s as well but you'd need 7 6s to vital the Hood if there were no other hits involved so making it automatic if you get more than 4 or more seems pretty severe.

I should also point out, because it seems nobody else has noticed, that the Fatal Flaw SA doesn't specify that it must be a main gunnery attack from a battleship, meaning that an extremely lucky shot from a secondary (or even tertiary) battery could also trigger the SA, even if that secondary would ordinarily not be able to sink it at all.

If you at least limit the SA to the exact number of 6s, no more, you almost make the Hood playable.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 27, 2008 - 1:40AM #6
AH_ericjohn
Posts: 109
Date Joined: 09/20/07

AH_Brass wrote:

I should also point out, because it seems nobody else has noticed, that the Fatal Flaw SA doesn't specify that it must be a main gunnery attack from a battleship, meaning that an extremely lucky shot from a secondary (or even tertiary) battery could also trigger the SA, even if that secondary would ordinarily not be able to sink it at all.


Yep happened to me last winter vs Scharnhorst - she clean missed me with the primaries, then rolled 4 sixes with the secondaries - ARGH!

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 27, 2008 - 10:21AM #7
AH_defender390
Posts: 454
Date Joined: 06/08/07

AH_ericjohn wrote:

Yep happened to me last winter vs Scharnhorst - she clean missed me with the primaries, then rolled 4 sixes with the secondaries - ARGH!


Dude - that's messed up. That should say only Main Gunnery for that SA to have any basis in historical representation. No wonder I have 4 Hoods in my "rarely used" box.

WaS Base: 64/64 (649)
WaS TF: 60/60 (513)
WaS FS: 40/40 (329)
WaS 2010 Starter: 0/8 (0) - 16 Mar 10
WaS CZ: 0/40 (0) - ERD Sep 10
TOTAL: 1491

AH defender390's Trade List
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 28, 2008 - 3:54PM #8
WotC_Huscarl
Posts: 1,140
Date Joined: 03/10/03
  • Obey My Dog!
"4 or more" is correct.

Steve
This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it. --Eeyore
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 28, 2008 - 4:28PM #9
AH_Brass
Posts: 100
Date Joined: 04/14/07
  • Weakly-godlike AI

WotC_Huscarl wrote:

"4 or more" is correct.

Steve


That's what I figured but hope springs eternal. Thanks, Steve.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 28, 2008 - 10:21PM #10
AH_aquarius
Posts: 83
Date Joined: 06/19/07
  • Septcentennial Member

WotC_Huscarl wrote:

"4 or more" is correct.

Steve


Is it four or more on main gunnery, or on any gunnery attack?

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Post Reply
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing