Community

 
Dungeons & Dra.. Previous Editions .. 3.5 D&D - Wearing Leather Armor w/o Light Armor...
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View 3.5 D&D - Wearing Leather Armor w/o Light Armor Proficiency
3 months ago  ::  Feb 16, 2013 - 4:48PM #1
Shadowfax7
Date Joined: May 21, 2003
Posts: 540
Is there any disadvantage for a non-caster to wear leather Armor if s/he is not proficient in wearing Light armor?
If it wasn't for Shadowfax, Gandalf never would have made it.

Shadowfax, the real hero of LotR.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 16, 2013 - 5:27PM #2
Ahruhn
Date Joined: Jan 9, 2013
Posts: 140
The armor check penalty is applied to all attack rolls and STR and DEX based skill checks.
 So, since leather armor has no armor check then there wouldn't be any other penalty.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 16, 2013 - 6:05PM #3
draco1119
  • California Dragon
Date Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 12,815
What kind of non-caster isn't proficient with light armor, other than psions & wilders (which I tend to think of as casters)?
"Today's headlines and history's judgment are rarely the same.  If you are too attentive to the former, you will most certainly not do the hard work of securing the latter."  -Condoleezza Rice

"My fellow Americans... I've just signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever.  Bombing begins in five minutes." - Ronald Reagan

This user has been brought to you by the letters "O-R-C" and the numbers "2, 3, 4, and 6"

Resident Pithed-Off Dragon
Buttler of the House of Trolls
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 16, 2013 - 7:48PM #4
Vortsukoto
Date Joined: Jan 6, 2013
Posts: 121

Feb 16, 2013 -- 6:05PM, draco1119 wrote:

What kind of non-caster isn't proficient with light armor, other than psions & wilders (which I tend to think of as casters)?


Commoner levies that you're trying to equip?

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 16, 2013 - 8:06PM #5
StevenO
Date Joined: Apr 9, 2004
Posts: 14,065
Yes and no.

There are some abilities that can only be used when not wearing armor so of course wearing armor is going to prevent their use.  It may not be what you are looking for but it is a "penalty" for wearing armor even if applies when proficient in its use.

For a great many characters if an armor or shield has a 0 for an APC then anyone could wear it without it being a problem.  I may make it take longer to get into or out of when not proficient but it can still be worn.
 
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 17, 2013 - 2:40AM #6
Ahruhn
Date Joined: Jan 9, 2013
Posts: 140
Yup, classes like Monk that specifically mention lost abilities when wearing any sort of armor still lose those abilities when wearing leather armor.

I was assuming Shadowfax was asking for something like a Commoner that has no mention of specific penalties in the class description.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 17, 2013 - 12:24PM #7
TorianT
Date Joined: Apr 27, 2009
Posts: 451
So in effect, mithril or a celestial chainmail is a way for rogues to wear better armor without a significant impact on their abilities, since both make the respective armor count as light and the effective ACP is almost non-existant by itself?
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 17, 2013 - 12:32PM #8
draco1119
  • California Dragon
Date Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 12,815
Githcrafted is also a viable option, I believe.
"Today's headlines and history's judgment are rarely the same.  If you are too attentive to the former, you will most certainly not do the hard work of securing the latter."  -Condoleezza Rice

"My fellow Americans... I've just signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever.  Bombing begins in five minutes." - Ronald Reagan

This user has been brought to you by the letters "O-R-C" and the numbers "2, 3, 4, and 6"

Resident Pithed-Off Dragon
Buttler of the House of Trolls
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 17, 2013 - 7:36PM #9
Slagger_the_Chuul
Date Joined: May 26, 2001
Posts: 5,167

Feb 17, 2013 -- 12:32PM, draco1119 wrote:

Githcrafted is also a viable option, I believe.


Feycraft and githcraft are usually used for reducing arcane spell failure, but don't do anything to help the armour check penalty.

Interestingly, the other nonmagical alteration (a thistledown suit) for reducing arcane spell failure actually increases the armour check penalty by 1, but that increased penalty can still be absorbed on a chain shirt when you're using mithral as the material.

The kraken stirs.  And ten billion sushi dinners cry out for vengeance.  - Good Omens

Co-Author of the Dreamfane, Euralden Eye, Gajuisan Crawler, Gruesome Lurker, Fulminating Crab, Ironglass Rose, Sheengrass Swarm, Spryjack, Usunag, and Warp Drifter, and author of the Magmal Horror from Force of Nature.


= My most popular campaign item; for all your adventuring convenience. Show
Zauber's Mutable Rod: This rod has a number of useful functions that make it easier to live in the wilderness.  It is made of polished wood, with five studlike buttons on one end.  Each button produces a different effect when pressed.  Unless otherwise noted, the rod’s functions have no limit on the number of times they can be employed.
        When button 1 is pressed, one end of the rod produces a small flame, equivalent to a candle.
        When button 2 is pressed, the rod unfolds into a two-person tent, complete with bedrolls and warm blankets.
        When button 3 is pressed, the rod becomes a one-handed hammer, suitable for pounding pitons into a wall.
        When button 4 is pressed, the rod becomes a sturdy iron spade.
        When button 5 is pressed, the rod becomes a wooden bucket able to hold 2 gallons of liquid.  Once per day, it can be commanded to fill with fresh water.
If the rod is seriously damaged or broken in any of its alternate forms (button 2, 3, 4, or 5), it reverts to its basic rod form and cannot be activated for 24 hours.
    Moderate conjuration; CL 9th; Craft Rod, minor creation; Price 375 gp; Weight 2 lb.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
Dungeons & Dra.. Previous Editions .. 3.5 D&D - Wearing Leather Armor w/o Light Armor...
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing