Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Please change the word thunder
3 months ago  ::  Feb 10, 2013 - 8:40PM #1
efiend71
Date Joined: Jan 16, 2012
Posts: 31
Thunder damage should be Sonic damage IMHO. I feel the wording Thunder is an odd fit in the roleplay discription side of the game. I will digress if I am alone with this thought.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 10, 2013 - 9:03PM #2
Talamare
Date Joined: May 12, 2009
Posts: 244
I support it, Thunder is stupid word to describe it and thematically narrows the effects that could cause it

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 10, 2013 - 9:23PM #3
Meiwayer0
Date Joined: Jan 4, 2013
Posts: 23
No, you´re not alone, i have been calling it sonic damage for years. I´ll add that it makes much more sense when your bard character deals sonic instead of thunder damage, it´s much more...intuitive.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 12:45AM #4
Haldrik
Date Joined: Jan 2, 2004
Posts: 9,395
From an other thread. Here, Thunder and possibly Sonic can merge into Force.

Feb 9, 2013 -- 7:04PM, Haldrik wrote:

Force is actually confusing. There are two different kinds of "force".

Force = gravity, acceleration, structural stress, atmospheric pressure, detonation, explosion, global kinetic damage, telekinesis.

Force = an object made out of force.

In the first definition, “force” should probably include “thunder” damage, in the sense of detonation. Maybe “sonic” vibration too, in the sense of structural stress.

The second definition should probably deal whatever damage the virtual object deals, in other words, pierce, slash, or bludgeon.




Feb 9, 2013 -- 7:23PM, Haldrik wrote:

Feb 9, 2013 -- 7:11PM, wrecan wrote:

I alway envisioned "force" damage as pure magic.  It's magical force.  That's why magic missiles inflict force damage.  So have no trouble envisioning that magic transcends the dimensional barrier between here and the ether.




As noted, spell descriptions and items like Force Beads, generally describe “force” as a detonation, and explosive energy.

In the Playtest, the Magic Missile description specifically mentions “magical force” and then continues to describe an explosive detonation:


Those who have been struck by this spell and survived describe a piercing pain that seems to pass through the body and out the other side. This spell leaves its victims bruised and can even break bones.






Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 2:09AM #5
Saelorn
Date Joined: May 27, 2012
Posts: 2,934
I like "thunder" to describe that sort of damaging pressure wave. To me, "sonic" is much more vague of a term, and doesn't realy describe how it's doing damage. For a fantasy game, I think "thunder" and "lightning" is more thematically appropriate than "sonic" and "electric".

In my sci-fi setting, I translate them as "blast" and "shock" damage. 
The metagame is not the game.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 3:31AM #6
Shiroiken
Date Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 253
I support the use of Thunder only because it is more setting appropriate for most DnD games (medieval fantasy). I would suggest that when they write up their descriptor of Energy types, that they clarify that Thunder includes all sound based attacks.

If you prefer to word Sonic, you can use it with your group and they will understand. You could even use it on the forums and most would understand what you meant.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 3:39AM #7
CarlT
Date Joined: Apr 10, 2009
Posts: 2,878

Feb 10, 2013 -- 8:40PM, efiend71 wrote:

Thunder damage should be Sonic damage IMHO. I feel the wording Thunder is an odd fit in the roleplay discription side of the game. I will digress if I am alone with this thought.




As far a am RP fit - thunder is far better.


Sonic is more 'scientific' and more accurate.  But as I see it, if you were to ask someone from that setting to describe the effect, I don't see them calling it a 'sonic effect' - I suspect they would say "It sounded like Thunder!"

So, although I understand not liking sonic from a precision point of view - I don't understand why you think it to be an 'odd fit in the roleplay descriptions side of the game'.  At all.


(Ditto for "Electical' versus "Lightning" or "Heat" versus "Fire")

Carl

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 3:41AM #8
Psikerlord
Date Joined: Mar 25, 2007
Posts: 1,394
Much prefer thunder - it fits the medieval theme much better than sonic.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 5:23AM #9
Haldrik
Date Joined: Jan 2, 2004
Posts: 9,395
If thunder covers explosions, detonations, atmospheric pressure extremes, global kinetic damage, and so on ...

Then Magic Missile and Beads of Force deal thunder damage.

Even Telekinesis seems to deal thunder damage, since there is little difference between the global damage being caused in a high force of gravity, high accelerating thrust, and being in an extreme pressure shift.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 11, 2013 - 6:25AM #10
CarlT
Date Joined: Apr 10, 2009
Posts: 2,878
It's all kinetic energy one way or another.

But I'm not sure that's a useful way of looking at it.

Carl
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing