Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 10 of 16  •  Prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Dragon's Eye View: Covering the Past
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 1:10PM #91
crazy_monkey
  • VCL Emeritus
  • The Inquisitor
Date Joined: Apr 5, 2006
Posts: 7,821
Personal opinion...

To me, the perfect D&D cover is almost the cover to the 1983 Red Box basic set (re-used in the 4th Edition D&D Essentials basic set from 2010).

I say almost because it has a dragon in a dungeon vs. a PC but it should have a group of PCs (four, covering the classic four archetypes).

That would be my ideal PHB cover.

Just my two cents.         
Quentin Small
WotC Online Community Coordinator
All around helpful simian
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 1:17PM #92
greatfrito
  • YMTS: XXIX Winner
Date Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Posts: 8,293
I really do love the 3e/3.5 covers.
But I also really like the 4e covers.
And I even like the 4eEssentials covers.

I'm not a fan of 70s/80s fantasy art, and that really colors my opinions on those covers.

So really, I'm not that picky.  Not in any way I suspect matters (because I sincerely doubt WotC would put 70s/80s style fantasy art on the cover of their books they're selling in the 21st century).

HOWEVER, I do want to say:

I really really really appreciate consistencyEspecially in cover design.  Consistent look on the shelf is a big deal, to me.  It makes a game stand out, and just... makes me happier to own the books.  This was a big deal with the format change on the Essentials books, for me - I really had no interest in picking them up, not just because of content I wasn't excited about, but also because they wouldn't match my books on the shelf.
Feedback Disclaimer Show

Yes, I am expressing my opinions (even complaints - le gasp!) about the current iteration of the play-test that we actually have in front of us.

No, I'm not going to wait for you to tell me when it's okay to start expressing my concerns (unless you are WotC).

(And no, my comments on this forum are not of the same tone or quality as my actual survey feedback.)

A Psion for Next (Playable Draft)
A Barbarian for Next (Brainstorming Still)
My 4e Projects Show
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 1:38PM #93
Zardnaar
Date Joined: Apr 15, 2001
Posts: 8,954

Jan 31, 2013 -- 7:48AM, wrecan wrote:

Here's another entry of mine (not my art, mind you. I can't draw)

I'd like this one to be a bit brighter so you can see the heroes better, but it conveys the proper emotions and story.
 




 THats not to bad. I like that shot. Not perfect but probably better than most of what we've had. 4th ed had some good covers but a few of them were ruined IMHO with the banner logo across the top of the page.

Reducing a character to a list of dice rolls and modifiers is not role playing*

*pg 30, AD&D 2nd Ed DMG, 1989.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 1:47PM #94
Crimson_Concerto
Date Joined: Aug 28, 2005
Posts: 10,239
The forum apparently glitched out posting my reply, so let's try again...

"subjective"


Hey, everyone, can we avoid this word in this discussion? Yes, a good deal of what we're discussing is subjective. However, even subjective views and opinions have reasons behind them, and some are still better than others, so trying to point out over and over again how something is subjective really isn't productive. Remember, exactly the reason that this article was written and wanted to provoke the discussion that it did was because, as subjective as it may be, it's still looking for the best answer. Subjective things are still worth discussing and even debating.

Jan 31, 2013 -- 5:50AM, wrecan wrote:

None of the faces in any of the covers have any particular expression, but it's only the faces on the 1e cover you think appear bored.  To me, this indicates that you are misidrecting your criticism.  It's not the faces.  It's the situation.  You prefer pics of people in or abotu to get into combat.  I don't have a particular preference for the action -- I want story.


Well, first of all, action and story are not mutually exclusive.
Second of all, I've said repeatedly that, while depicting combat is an example of how a cover scene could be made exciting and expressive, it is not the only one. I've given a few examples of non-combat scenes that I think would be perfect for the cover, and some of them have even been of post-combat looting scenes like the one depicted on the AD&D cover, so it's definitely not the situation that I am criticising but rather how the situation and the characters in that situation are being portrayed.
And, yes, it's not just the faces. Like I said, body language plays into it quite a bit as well and it part of what contributes to the faces on the AD&D cover looking so bored to me. That's why, even though it may be difficult to discern exactly what facial expressions some of the characters on other covers are portraying, it's easy for me to say that at least they're clearly no expressing boredom.

Jan 31, 2013 -- 6:28AM, Arithezoo wrote:

It doesn't start at the usual point, and gets the viewer to ask, "How did the characters get to this point?"


I could say the same thing about the 2E and 4E covers, though, and I could ask a bunch of questions about them similar to the ones that you're asking about the AD&D cover, so what is it exactly that makes the AD&D cover so "good" at this? Is it just because it has more set pieces?

Despite a complete lack of action, the scene conveys a sense of intense action that just concluded.


Would you have any idea that a combat scene took place a short while ago if not for the deal reptilian bodies? If the combat was really intense, shouldn't there be other signs of it? Why are no characters wounded? Why is nobody looting the corpses? Why does nobody look victorious or relieved? Why is there no blood on anybody's clothes? It could be argued that there was blood on the Fighter's sword, but even that we're catching after it's been wiped off. I can tell from the scene that there was combat, but I can't tell that it was intense. If anything, it looks like it was pretty easy.

Jan 31, 2013 -- 7:43AM, lawrencehoy wrote:

I see exhaustion. Which relays more of a "Wow, that was tough; let's see what we've gained from this battle, take a few minutes to rest up, and make some plans for what comes next."


See my above response. What is it that's making you think the battle was tough or even particularly noteworthy? If not for the Fighter cleaning his blade, I would doubt that the characters portrayed were even the ones who fought and killed the reptiles in the first place, and even that's not a great indication.

EDIT: Here's an alternative interpretation of the AD&D cover scene. The characters all have blank expressions because they've all been hypnotized into helping the evil lizardfolk cultists summon their death god. The two character in the foreground are reading not a map but a diagram of how to draw out the summoning circle, the one on the right pointing to where they'll start. The two "thieves" are actually just commoners retrieving the gems necessary to complete the ritual. The fighter is cleaning off a ritual blade, and the scene is devoid of any sign of struggle or other indicators of combat because the lizardfolk were voluntary sacrifices. The Wizard is old and frail, but the cult leader will use his arcane prowess when the ritual circle is completed to help summon the deity, so he's just standing around for now.

How conveniently you excluded my final paragraph, which relates the piece of art with what is the essence of D&D.


I excluded it because I didn't think that it needed responding to. I think that we agree on what the essence of D&D is, and I even agree that the AD&D cover is trying to portray it in ways that other covers since than haven't. We just disagree on whether the AD&D cover is doing a good job of it. When I see the AD&D cover portraying the essence of D&D, my reaction is "And why would I want that?", and that's what the crux of our disagreement is.

I won't agrue that you can...


Seems a lot of people sure are arguing that, though.

Jan 31, 2013 -- 7:48AM, wrecan wrote:

Here's another entry of mine (not my art, mind you. I can't draw)

I'd like this one to be a bit brighter so you can see the heroes better, but it conveys the proper emotions and story.


This is, like, almost perfect cover artwork. This is exactly the sort of thing that I meant when I said before that a piece did not have to include combat to be exciting and expressive. We can't even see their faces, but their body language speaks volumes. Absolutely stunning and an excellent expression of D&D as far as I'm concerned.

Why, yes, as a matter of fact I am the Unfailing Arbiter of All That Is Good Design (Even More So Than The Actual Developers) TM

Speaking of things that were badly designed, please check out this thread for my Minotaur fix. What have the critics said, you ask?
"If any of my players ask to play a Minotaur, I'm definitely offering this as an alternative to the official version." - EmpactWB
"If I ever feel like playing a Minotaur I'll know where to look!" - Undrave
"WoTC if you are reading this - please take this guy's advice." - Ferol_Debtor_of_Torm
"Really full of win. A minotaur that is actually attractive for more than just melee classes." - Cpt_Micha

Also, check out my recent GENASI variant! If you've ever wished that your Fire Genasi could actually set stuff on fire, your Water Genasi could actually swim, or your Wind Genasi could at least glide, then look no further.

Finally, check out my OPTIONS FOR EVERYONE article, an effort to give unique support to the races that WotC keeps forgetting about. Includes new racial feature options for the Changeling, Deva, Githzerai, Gnoll, Gnome, Goliath, Half-Orc, Kalashtar, Minotaur, Shadar-Kai, Thri-Kreen, Warforged and more!
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 2:02PM #95
Tevish_Szat
  • Unconventional Mafia Pro
  • Dark Lord
Date Joined: Jun 25, 2001
Posts: 9,665

Jan 31, 2013 -- 1:10PM, crazy_monkey wrote:

Personal opinion...

To me, the perfect D&D cover is almost the cover to the 1983 Red Box basic set (re-used in the 4th Edition D&D Essentials basic set from 2010).

I say almost because it has a dragon in a dungeon vs. a PC but it should have a group of PCs (four, covering the classic four archetypes).

That would be my ideal PHB cover.

Just my two cents.         



Something like this?



Well... I guess that's only up to 2.

"Enjoy your screams, Sarpadia - they will soon be muffled beneath snow and ice."
THE COALITION WAR GAME
-Phyrexian Praetor
Round 1: (4-1-2, 1 kill)
Round 2: (16-8-2, 4 kills)
Round 3: (18-9-2, 1 kill)
Round 4: (22-10-0, 2 kills)
Round 5: (56-16-3, 9 kills)
Round 6: (8-7-1) [current round]

Last Edited by Ralph on blank, 1920
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 2:04PM #96
wrecan
  • Forum Guide
  • Hero Craftsman Gold Medalist
  • Master Dungeon Master
Date Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 17,727

Jan 31, 2013 -- 1:47PM, Crimson_Concerto wrote:

And, yes, it's not just the faces. Like I said, body language plays into it quite a bit as well and it part of what contributes to the faces on the AD&D cover looking so bored to me. That's why, even though it may be difficult to discern exactly what facial expressions some of the characters on other covers are portraying, it's easy for me to say that at least they're clearly no expressing boredom.



I'm not exactly sure why you hink repeatign this point over and over is going to lead us somewhere new.  We get it.  The 1e cover conveys boredom to you, based on a combination of facial expressions, body language, and situation.  It doesn't to me (or the other people on this thread who indicated such), based on body languages and situation.  What else is there to say?

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 2:06PM #97
crazy_monkey
  • VCL Emeritus
  • The Inquisitor
Date Joined: Apr 5, 2006
Posts: 7,821

Jan 31, 2013 -- 2:02PM, Tevish_Szat wrote:

Jan 31, 2013 -- 1:10PM, crazy_monkey wrote:

Personal opinion...

To me, the perfect D&D cover is almost the cover to the 1983 Red Box basic set (re-used in the 4th Edition D&D Essentials basic set from 2010).

I say almost because it has a dragon in a dungeon vs. a PC but it should have a group of PCs (four, covering the classic four archetypes).

That would be my ideal PHB cover.

Just my two cents.         



Something like this?



Well... I guess that's only up to 2.




Personal opinion...

Yes, though with a modern art style and a bit more "action" from the dragon (breathing fire, about to claw or bite someone, that sort of thing). 

Quentin Small
WotC Online Community Coordinator
All around helpful simian
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 2:11PM #98
Lesp
Date Joined: May 5, 2009
Posts: 2,411

Jan 31, 2013 -- 2:02PM, Tevish_Szat wrote:

Jan 31, 2013 -- 1:10PM, crazy_monkey wrote:

Personal opinion...

To me, the perfect D&D cover is almost the cover to the 1983 Red Box basic set (re-used in the 4th Edition D&D Essentials basic set from 2010).

I say almost because it has a dragon in a dungeon vs. a PC but it should have a group of PCs (four, covering the classic four archetypes).

That would be my ideal PHB cover.

Just my two cents.         



Something like this?



Well... I guess that's only up to 2.


I like that design a lot, with four people. (And updated art, obviously). I think that a group of four clearly visible and differentiable people fighting a red dragon is the best possible image for an image-based cover. This is the PHB.

Dwarves invented beer so they could toast to their axes. Dwarves invented axes to kill people and take their beer.

Swanmay Syndrome: Despite the percentages given in the Monster Manual, in reality 100% of groups of swans contain a Swanmay, because otherwise the DM would not have put any swans in the game.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 2:13PM #99
wrecan
  • Forum Guide
  • Hero Craftsman Gold Medalist
  • Master Dungeon Master
Date Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 17,727
Man, there's a picture from around 2007 or so which has a party of four (dwarf, elf, human, and female) descending a stone staircase and fighting a dragon).  It was a great picture and would make a perfect cover.  I just can't find it on the web.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 31, 2013 - 3:53PM #100
malcapricornis
Date Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Posts: 1,798
Saying it's "subjective" and just accepting that some people think a particular pose expresses emotion x and another think it expresses emotion y and each group accepting that what the other says is valid to them at least moves the discussion on. Instead of people going back and forth over whether or not a particular rotation of a particular limb or a smirk or the absence of a smirk is some Objective Universal Truth™.

For a set of books, I think you ought to go with consistency. IMO, when you have a group of nice looking books with consistent type and art style it makes for a more pleasing experience. Secondly, for what WotC has been charging for books, you don't want them to look cheap or amateurish. I sincerely doubt that will be the case with DDN. I would also prefer more fantastical art with some more traditional elements as opposed to all traditional elements. I.e. it's nice seeing the exotic races and monsters on the cover and have those in exotic locales.

 
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 10 of 16  •  Prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing