Community

 
Jump Menu:
Pause Switch to Standard View 4e and miniatures
Show More
Loading...
Flag Deichgraf January 25, 2013 2:27 AM PST
hm...

Sorry if there's already an answer to my question, but I couldn't find it via forum search.

Are the miniatures in the diverse products by WotC the right scale to use them on 4e battle grids? 
Flag thespaceinvader January 25, 2013 2:43 AM PST
yes.
Flag Deichgraf January 25, 2013 3:05 AM PST
hm...

Many thanks! 
Flag thewok January 25, 2013 3:19 AM PST
The minis in Conquest of Nerath, obviously, are not.  They are at a smaller scale so as to better represent mass warfare.

The minis from the D&D miniatures lines, the Adventure system games (Castle Ravenloft, Wrath of Ashardalon, Legend of Drizzt), the Beholder and Dragon collector's sets, Dungeon Command and so on are all sized properly for a 1" grid.  I just wish WotC were a bit more ... consistent with base sizes. I have some Large creatures that don't have 2" bases.  More like 1.5" or so.
Flag FLAvatar January 25, 2013 5:13 AM PST
I actually like the undersized bases, makes it easier to move the critter when it's surrounded by smaller figs.  Always seems to be horns or wings or weapons or something catching on the full-size large bases and causing chaos when I lift it.  Then again, that could just be my 8 DEX catching up with me. =)
Flag mvincent January 25, 2013 1:32 PM PST

Jan 25, 2013 -- 3:19AM, thewok wrote:

I have some Large creatures that don't have 2" bases.  More like 1.5" or so.


The WotC DDM line initially used 1.5" for large bases (since their Chainmail figures used these, and thus were compatible with bases from popular miniature wargames like Warhammer, and poker chip sizes).

WotC later switched to 2" bases to fix an issue where two 1.5" bases could fit in a 3"x3" area (creating inadvertent overlap).

Flag Felorn January 25, 2013 1:35 PM PST
To be completely honest I prefer Tokens, and Paizo's Cut out miniatures. I feel that they are more accurate to the monster. It shows what they really look like.
Flag DavidArgall January 25, 2013 10:05 PM PST

Jan 25, 2013 -- 1:35PM, Felorn wrote:

To be completely honest I prefer Tokens, and Paizo's Cut out miniatures. I feel that they are more accurate to the monster. It shows what they really look like.



    Maybe it's my weak vision, but I find tokens too east to confuse with each other.  Now the stand-up 2-D figures ought to be superior to miniatures for both space and cost, but somehow I have never got into them.

Flag RedSiegfried January 26, 2013 10:37 AM PST

Jan 25, 2013 -- 1:35PM, Felorn wrote:

To be completely honest I prefer Tokens, and Paizo's Cut out miniatures. I feel that they are more accurate to the monster. It shows what they really look like.


I see what you did there.

Flag mvincent January 28, 2013 10:48 AM PST

Jan 26, 2013 -- 10:37AM, RedSiegfried wrote:

Jan 25, 2013 -- 1:35PM, Felorn wrote:

To be completely honest I prefer Tokens, and Paizo's Cut out miniatures. I feel that they are more accurate to the monster. It shows what they really look like.


I see what you did there.



Is he talking about using inappropriate miniatures as proxies for other creatures?
If so, I feel bad for you then. I have 99 hundred minis, but a proxy is not one.

Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing