Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 5 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5
Switch to Forum Live View Larger or smallest Shields and AC
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 9:32PM #41
Ahruhn
Date Joined: Jan 9, 2013
Posts: 140
I couldn't find it specifically in PHB but it's stated quite plainly in Rules Compendium pg 84


Shields



Shields don’t change size to match the wielder. You can’t use an inappropriately sized shield.


Edit: Also, just in case the subject of Rules Precedence comes up, Rules Compendium pg 5 under 'Introduction' states, "When a preexisting core book or supplement differs with the rules herein, Rules Compendium is meant to take precedence. If you have a question on how to play D&D at the table, this book is meant to answer that question."




Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 9:54PM #42
MrCustomer
Date Joined: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2,385
Glad I called what I said a house rule then, lol, thank you Ahruhn.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 10:03PM #43
StevenO
Date Joined: Apr 9, 2004
Posts: 14,067

Jan 29, 2013 -- 9:32PM, Ahruhn wrote:

I couldn't find it specifically in PHB but it's stated quite plainly in Rules Compendium pg 84


Shields



Shields don’t change size to match the wielder. You can’t use an inappropriately sized shield.



Considering how much faith Oma has put into the RC when trying to explain how the UMD skill makes it easier to use scrolls then just being a spellcaster who could actually cast the spell I'm surprised he managed to miss that.

I don't own the RC but the answer to all of his "show it too me" questions have been staring him in the face the whole time.
 

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 10:09PM #44
Ahruhn
Date Joined: Jan 9, 2013
Posts: 140

Jan 29, 2013 -- 10:03PM, StevenO wrote:


Considering how much faith Oma has put into the RC when trying to explain how the UMD skill makes it easier to use scrolls then just being a spellcaster who could actually cast the spell I'm surprised he managed to miss that.

I don't own the RC but the answer to all of his "show it too me" questions have been staring him in the face the whole time.
 




I'll have to find that Scrolls arguement and see what he's saying about it. You have a link you can point me to? I'm guessing it's hidden in a completely unrelated thread.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 10:50PM #45
StevenO
Date Joined: Apr 9, 2004
Posts: 14,067

Jan 29, 2013 -- 10:09PM, Ahruhn wrote:

Jan 29, 2013 -- 10:03PM, StevenO wrote:


Considering how much faith Oma has put into the RC when trying to explain how the UMD skill makes it easier to use scrolls then just being a spellcaster who could actually cast the spell I'm surprised he managed to miss that.

I don't own the RC but the answer to all of his "show it too me" questions have been staring him in the face the whole time.
 




I'll have to find that Scrolls arguement and see what he's saying about it. You have a link you can point me to? I'm guessing it's hidden in a completely unrelated thread.


You're probably right about the thread heading and giving the explosive nature it isn't going to be too easy to find the posts either.  There have been several things including "casting" the spell off a scroll as opposed to simply "activating" the spell on the scroll.  Now that I think about it the topic was probably concerning counterspells and if you could use a scroll to do it.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 30, 2013 - 5:51AM #46
MrCustomer
Date Joined: Aug 3, 2007
Posts: 2,385
The scroll debate was so far off topic as to be unrecognizable, and then I believe I made it worse -hangs head in shame- It largely involves ignoring the actual rules for scrolls and using the UMD skill as the official rules for magic items instead, hard to argue with "ignore the official rules, these unrelated rules overwrite them" line of trolling. Same guy that casts slow on his mount so it can ready a charge in the middle of a full round attack.

It's ok if a DM overlooks a rule, such as the shields discussed here, so long as he makes a fair ruling in the interests of balanced play, it's when the rules are twisted to be used in an exploitive fashion that it is an issue.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 30, 2013 - 6:45AM #47
Slagger_the_Chuul
Date Joined: May 26, 2001
Posts: 5,167
To be fair, though, the rules aren't always very specific, and some of the ideas involved don't directly contradict each other, so they're not explicitly ruled out unless the writer thought that particular issue might be a problem.  For example, a number of different descriptions refer to activating spell items as "casting" the spell from an item, and activation of an item doesn't inherently exclude the possibility of it counting as casting.

Shields are a perfect example of the kind of ambiguity that exists; you've already got descriptions of using differently-sized weapons in the equipment chapter of the PHB, and different armour sizes described in the armour section of the chaper, but they didn't bother to mention what would happen for differently-sized armour (which is possibly covered by the DM's common sense), or shields (which is more credible, since it's easy to imagine a human trying to use a giant's shield for protection).  You'd expect the PHB's equipment section to cover it, but it takes until the Rules Compendium before an explicit answer is given.  Not, of course, that the DM can't cover the gaps, but it's nice if they don't have to do so.

Unlike some of the rather self-important people with whom I've occasionally spoken, Oma isn't phobically afraid of using actual evidence to support his claims, which I consider to be a plus in a discussion.  It would be very nice if that language barrier disappeared, though, since I'm often left wondering if his points make more sense on the other side (especially with things like that discussion about "spell levels" with the ring of spell storing).
The kraken stirs.  And ten billion sushi dinners cry out for vengeance.  - Good Omens

Co-Author of the Dreamfane, Euralden Eye, Gajuisan Crawler, Gruesome Lurker, Fulminating Crab, Ironglass Rose, Sheengrass Swarm, Spryjack, Usunag, and Warp Drifter, and author of the Magmal Horror from Force of Nature.


= My most popular campaign item; for all your adventuring convenience. Show
Zauber's Mutable Rod: This rod has a number of useful functions that make it easier to live in the wilderness.  It is made of polished wood, with five studlike buttons on one end.  Each button produces a different effect when pressed.  Unless otherwise noted, the rod’s functions have no limit on the number of times they can be employed.
        When button 1 is pressed, one end of the rod produces a small flame, equivalent to a candle.
        When button 2 is pressed, the rod unfolds into a two-person tent, complete with bedrolls and warm blankets.
        When button 3 is pressed, the rod becomes a one-handed hammer, suitable for pounding pitons into a wall.
        When button 4 is pressed, the rod becomes a sturdy iron spade.
        When button 5 is pressed, the rod becomes a wooden bucket able to hold 2 gallons of liquid.  Once per day, it can be commanded to fill with fresh water.
If the rod is seriously damaged or broken in any of its alternate forms (button 2, 3, 4, or 5), it reverts to its basic rod form and cannot be activated for 24 hours.
    Moderate conjuration; CL 9th; Craft Rod, minor creation; Price 375 gp; Weight 2 lb.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 30, 2013 - 8:04AM #48
draco1119
  • California Dragon
Date Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 12,814
Am I the only one to notice that Oma hasn't bothered posting in this thread since he was successful in getting someone banned? 
"Today's headlines and history's judgment are rarely the same.  If you are too attentive to the former, you will most certainly not do the hard work of securing the latter."  -Condoleezza Rice

"My fellow Americans... I've just signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever.  Bombing begins in five minutes." - Ronald Reagan

This user has been brought to you by the letters "O-R-C" and the numbers "2, 3, 4, and 6"

Resident Pithed-Off Dragon
Buttler of the House of Trolls
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 30, 2013 - 8:39AM #49
Oma012
Date Joined: Apr 25, 2011
Posts: 1,795

Jan 29, 2013 -- 9:32PM, Ahruhn wrote:

I couldn't find it specifically in PHB but it's stated quite plainly in Rules Compendium pg 84


Shields



Shields don’t change size to match the wielder. You can’t use an inappropriately sized shield.


Edit: Also, just in case the subject of Rules Precedence comes up, Rules Compendium pg 5 under 'Introduction' states, "When a preexisting core book or supplement differs with the rules herein, Rules Compendium is meant to take precedence. If you have a question on how to play D&D at the table, this book is meant to answer that question."





Thanks, this a official rule that i can apply.

Pepe pecas pica papas con un pico con un pico pepe pecas pica papas si pepe pecas pica papas con un pico donde esta el pico con que pepe pecas pica papas.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 5 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing