Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Why aren't Spells a metagame resource?
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 1:50PM #21
Dwarfslayer
Date Joined: Oct 25, 2010
Posts: 2,037
If fighters had to prepare manuevers for the day like wizards, then I don't see any problem with it. Then you just change it from manuevers known to manuevers prepared. If fighters have access to every manuever they know, then that could get problematic if you can learn them.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 2:52PM #22
Lord_Markelhay
Date Joined: Dec 27, 2011
Posts: 536
What if there was an optional rule where XP was replaced with training? A wizard must find suitable spellbooks to study, a fighter must train under a weaponmaster, a monk must channel Ki in a monastery, a cleric must find a holy place of his deity's, etc. It could be somewhat difficult to pull off, though...

I usually rule that a character cannot level up until the party returns to town (or escapes from immediate danger) and hones their skills. So the monk goes through some exercises, the fighter practices his fighting technique to gain a new maneuver, etc. I don't really care for the idea of the characters' progression being entirely metagame.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 3:01PM #23
CarlT
Date Joined: Apr 10, 2009
Posts: 2,878
I like the idea of fighters being able to learn maneuvers as they find teachers, tomes, etc. - independant of level.  In the abstract.

That said - I would expect to see some limitations on the idea. 


First, let's talk Wizards.
I think that Wizards should have some limitations on how many spells they can know (as in days of old).    Being able to cast every spell really shouldn't be a viable goal of any wizard.
I also think that Wizards should have a chance to fail to learn a new spell they found (also as in days of old).  Learning magic is tough and shouldn't be guaranteed - and should be based on Intelligence.

Now, Fighters (and other maneuver users)
I think that martial classes should have some limitations on how many maneuvers they can know.
I also think that martial classes should have a chance to fail to learn a new maneuver.

Bottom Line:  I don't understand why (aside from an attempt to spread a very limited resource - the few maneuvers they have at present - over a wide range of fighting-styles and levels) they don't just allow the fighter to pick a new maneuver every other level (or the like).    More maneuvers does not make the fighter that much more powerful, it makes him more diverse. And more options, more diversity and more interesting things to do seem to be what people are always asking for in the Fighter.

Instead - the approach they are taking has a catch 22 in that they must make sure that all maneuvers are awesome, because that may be the only new toy the fighter gets to play with for the next four levels.  If they instead tripled the number of maneuvers - even if some of those are overly specialized and not generally useful enough to be a major class feature, but are useful to particular builds or particular approaches (for example - a weapon specific maneuver) - they could allow the players to pick their maneuvers from this wider pool; and pick more often.  And these more specialized, less generally useful maneuvers would still have a place for some characters and would be worth including as an option.


To put this another way - the maneuver design space is potentially huge and would seem to be where many of the combat feats from 3.x should probably end up (although rewritten to make their power level dependant upon the use of expertise dice).    I'd like to see this design space used and I'd like to see fighters end up with a model simlar to that of the wizard where the power is depenant upon level/ expertise dice and the versatility is dependant upon the campaign/DM (finding scrolls/trainers) with a minimum guaranteed set of options (some spells/maneuvers gained upon level-up).

Carl
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 3:11PM #24
SleepsInTraffic
Date Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Posts: 4,551

Jan 8, 2013 -- 1:50PM, Dwarfslayer wrote:

If fighters had to prepare manuevers for the day like wizards, then I don't see any problem with it. Then you just change it from manuevers known to manuevers prepared. If fighters have access to every manuever they know, then that could get problematic if you can learn them.





I know I am going to hate my self for this one...

Stances

takes an action to switch stances and changes your maneuver list as you do it.  Less of an assuming a specific stance type deal (though specific maneuvers that switch your stance automatically might be coolish) more that you shift stance and get to reshuffle your available maneuvers.

This would be book keeping intensive and fairly complex however.  Unless you were to have a number of standardized maneuver loadouts you could use.  the number of loadouts available increasing as you level. at that point it doesn't matter as much how many maneuvers you know because you can only have like 6 available for use at a time.

Not a full idea but a base for one, but undoubtedly never gunna happen except for home brewing.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 3:44PM #25
Brightmantle
Date Joined: May 25, 2012
Posts: 1,001

Jan 8, 2013 -- 6:57AM, ryanroyce wrote:

This is the main reason I'm in favor of maneuvers known not being tied to level (not *just* level, at least). Let it be story-driven, like wizards finding spells in books or on scrolls.  Rangers in particular could learn new abilities based on the monsters they encounter.


This.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 3:44PM #26
Lawolf
Date Joined: May 4, 2008
Posts: 4,204

Jan 8, 2013 -- 3:11PM, SleepsInTraffic wrote:

Jan 8, 2013 -- 1:50PM, Dwarfslayer wrote:

If fighters had to prepare manuevers for the day like wizards, then I don't see any problem with it. Then you just change it from manuevers known to manuevers prepared. If fighters have access to every manuever they know, then that could get problematic if you can learn them.





I know I am going to hate my self for this one...

Stances

takes an action to switch stances and changes your maneuver list as you do it.  Less of an assuming a specific stance type deal (though specific maneuvers that switch your stance automatically might be coolish) more that you shift stance and get to reshuffle your available maneuvers.

This would be book keeping intensive and fairly complex however.  Unless you were to have a number of standardized maneuver loadouts you could use.  the number of loadouts available increasing as you level. at that point it doesn't matter as much how many maneuvers you know because you can only have like 6 available for use at a time.

Not a full idea but a base for one, but undoubtedly never gunna happen except for home brewing.




That idea bears a remarkable resemblance to the WoW fighter.

Interesting...

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 3:53PM #27
SleepsInTraffic
Date Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Posts: 4,551

Jan 8, 2013 -- 3:44PM, Lawolf wrote:

Jan 8, 2013 -- 3:11PM, SleepsInTraffic wrote:

Jan 8, 2013 -- 1:50PM, Dwarfslayer wrote:

If fighters had to prepare manuevers for the day like wizards, then I don't see any problem with it. Then you just change it from manuevers known to manuevers prepared. If fighters have access to every manuever they know, then that could get problematic if you can learn them.





I know I am going to hate my self for this one...

Stances

takes an action to switch stances and changes your maneuver list as you do it.  Less of an assuming a specific stance type deal (though specific maneuvers that switch your stance automatically might be coolish) more that you shift stance and get to reshuffle your available maneuvers.

This would be book keeping intensive and fairly complex however.  Unless you were to have a number of standardized maneuver loadouts you could use.  the number of loadouts available increasing as you level. at that point it doesn't matter as much how many maneuvers you know because you can only have like 6 available for use at a time.

Not a full idea but a base for one, but undoubtedly never gunna happen except for home brewing.




That idea bears a remarkable resemblance to the WoW fighter.

Interesting...




Sadly I didn't even totally know that.  I mean I knew they had stances I just didn't know the stances changed what powers they could use.

I haven't played WoW in years and when I did I played mostly Warlocks and Rogues, and a Deathnight. (Played mostly vanilla and a little bit of wrath)

I'm just rereading / relistening to the Wheel of Time series and there is a lot of fighters and sword work in it, so the idea of changing stances to attain a new position in combat, and therfore opening up the usage of other maneuvers you couldn't previously pull off just kinda came off the tips of my fingers.  if it bears any resmblence it must have been that shred of memory from back in the day that influenced it.
 

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 3:59PM #28
Jenks
Date Joined: Apr 4, 2008
Posts: 2,493
Fighters really don't need more than 5 or 6 maneuvers. Using MDD is a turn by turn choice, not a daily like spellcasters. Give the fighter more than that and you will see them taking maneuvers they never use. Keeping it to 5 or so keeps the choices meaningful while giving you plenty of wiggle room to take the maneuvers you really want.

What I'm getting at is, increasing complexity of fighters probaly shouldn't be giving them more maneuvers. It's not making them more complex, it's just adding more paint on a painted wall.
My two copper.



Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 4:02PM #29
Lawolf
Date Joined: May 4, 2008
Posts: 4,204
I actually think the stances idea sounds great.  I say get rid of "parry" and have the fighter's defining feature be stances. A fighter in a guardian stance might work as the party's defender while other stances could also have their own unique maneuvers they have access to. 

It leads to a more interesting fighter overall because he can switch stances depending on the situation, but each stance could be fairly simple on its own. It also prevents some abuses that could come about where the fighter can simultaneously be the best damage dealer and the best tank because he chose the only defensive maneuver in the game.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 08, 2013 - 5:01PM #30
Garthanos
Date Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Posts: 17,643

Jan 8, 2013 -- 3:59PM, Jenks wrote:

Fighters really don't need more than 5 or 6 maneuvers. Using MDD is a turn by turn choice, not a daily like spellcasters. Give the fighter more than that and you will see them taking maneuvers they never use. Keeping it to 5 or so keeps the choices meaningful while giving you plenty of wiggle room to take the maneuvers you really want.  




7 at a time are the entent of "short-term" memory management  if they are completely distinct... ofcourse there is also feats .... and you know -- Some feats really are maneuvers  ... argh.  

But think about this what if you get an upgrade not a new move. For instance you start with Riposte  (enemy misses provokes an opportunity attack) or my Berserker analog called Retaliate (enemy hits and provokes an opportunity attack - this works with heavy weapons too) either of these can upgrade to

  • Responsive attack (enemy attacks - whether it hits or misses you get an extra attack)  this is almost like 1 extra attack for any enemies you are engaged with .... but an enemy could run/shift or whatever past  with out attacking... or providing an extra response.
  • Berserk Attack (every subject near you takes damage or provokes an attack, whether they attack or not) 
  • Steel Barrage or Controlled Berserk (as above but only enemies) 

Improvisation in 4e: Improv. Attacks(by wrecan) - Fave 4E Improvisations

The Non-combatant Adventurer

Reality is unrealistic - and even monkeys protest unfairness

Dynamic Reflavoring : The Fighter : The Wizard : The Swordmage
Creative Character Collection - Featuring:The Faerie Master - Snow White - Joxer - Ironman - Elric - Bloodwright

By virtue of being a player your characters are the protagonists in a heroic fantasy game even at level one

"You have to explicitly give non-casters permission to do awesome, where as with magic it is just assumed they can." -Garthanos

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing