|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 1:23PM
#31
|
Date Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
|
I actually found ultramodern4 to be very badly designed options... maybe i have my bar raised way too high...
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 1:30PM
#32
|
Date Joined:
Sep 19, 2007
|
I actually found ultramodern4 to be very badly designed options... maybe i have my bar raised way too high...
Oh, it definitely made me appreciate WoTC's quality control on 4e. It does play alot better than it looks on paper though. And multi-attacking is somewhat reigned in due to lack of all the magic item boosters.
That said, the Vanguard class seems to be lacking a striker feature, which wasnt even addressed in its eratta.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 4:36PM
#33
|
Date Joined:
Aug 13, 2007
|
I actually found ultramodern4 to be very badly designed options... maybe i have my bar raised way too high...
Im not sure what you mean, while most of the ideas probably wouldnt make a WotC product, but they are quite innovative for the 4e structure.
 Never Point a loaded party at a plot you are not willing to shoot. Arcane Rhetoric. My Blog.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 10:12PM
#34
|
Date Joined:
May 24, 2012
|
My perfect 4e? Make it more like Ultramodern4.
I love it, the ladder system combined with lite classes make it perfect for me.
Also they take it in more radical directions with more move and minor action powers.
Dude, this book was awesome! And yes, a sampling of this book would be great for a post-4e system. Heck, get DEM on board
Disgruntled ghost of the Knights of W.T.F. (Keep D&D alive, end the edition wars!)
"And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Disclaimer: Most of my posts are based on opinions (and are sometimes humorous, other times inspirational)
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 10, 2013 - 2:15PM
#35
|
|
|
Oddly, I don't find most of the other problems posted here to be problematic in my games; feats, class imbalance, etc., not an issue for me.
However, if I could change one thing in 4e, it would be to get rid of EVERY power that "lasts until the start/end of your next turn." Don't give me a power that, if I hit, gives me a +2 on my next attack. Instead, give me the +2 now for the attack I'm about to make and be done with it.
Way, way, way too much tracking in 4e for my tastes. I can handle the ongoing fire/poison/etc damage, but I can't stand the '+2 to REF and FORT to all allies within 3 squares until the end of your next turn'. All of those need to be gone from the game; marking-gone, aegis-gone, divine challenge-gone, quarry-gone, etc.
Here's a rule I'm trying to get my players to buy into: once I tell you it's your turn, we start a 2-minute timer (I'd prefer 1 minute). At the end of that timer, your turn is over, even if you have a standard left.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 12, 2013 - 3:51PM
#36
|
|
|
Oddly, I don't find most of the other problems posted here to be problematic in my games; feats, class imbalance, etc., not an issue for me.
However, if I could change one thing in 4e, it would be to get rid of EVERY power that "lasts until the start/end of your next turn." Don't give me a power that, if I hit, gives me a +2 on my next attack. Instead, give me the +2 now for the attack I'm about to make and be done with it.
Way, way, way too much tracking in 4e for my tastes. I can handle the ongoing fire/poison/etc damage, but I can't stand the '+2 to REF and FORT to all allies within 3 squares until the end of your next turn'. All of those need to be gone from the game; marking-gone, aegis-gone, divine challenge-gone, quarry-gone, etc.
Here's a rule I'm trying to get my players to buy into: once I tell you it's your turn, we start a 2-minute timer (I'd prefer 1 minute). At the end of that timer, your turn is over, even if you have a standard left.
So, basically screw the defenders of one of their most useful features. And a lot of Wizard, Warlock, and Cleric powers... Don't bother keeping track of it: only keep track of the effects affecting your creatures/characters at that time. Let the players keep track of what their character has going on. If you are running, assign tagging conditions to one of the players--speeds up most combat rounds very effectively.
Colors
Show
Bow down, my subjects, for I am your master! Yesss.....
Show
For some reason, none of my friends were surprised by this...
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 12, 2013 - 4:43PM
#37
|
|
|
Oddly, I don't find most of the other problems posted here to be problematic in my games; feats, class imbalance, etc., not an issue for me.
However, if I could change one thing in 4e, it would be to get rid of EVERY power that "lasts until the start/end of your next turn." Don't give me a power that, if I hit, gives me a +2 on my next attack. Instead, give me the +2 now for the attack I'm about to make and be done with it.
Way, way, way too much tracking in 4e for my tastes. I can handle the ongoing fire/poison/etc damage, but I can't stand the '+2 to REF and FORT to all allies within 3 squares until the end of your next turn'. All of those need to be gone from the game; marking-gone, aegis-gone, divine challenge-gone, quarry-gone, etc.
Here's a rule I'm trying to get my players to buy into: once I tell you it's your turn, we start a 2-minute timer (I'd prefer 1 minute). At the end of that timer, your turn is over, even if you have a standard left.
So, basically screw the defenders of one of their most useful features. And a lot of Wizard, Warlock, and Cleric powers... Don't bother keeping track of it: only keep track of the effects affecting your creatures/characters at that time. Let the players keep track of what their character has going on. If you are running, assign tagging conditions to one of the players--speeds up most combat rounds very effectively.
I think you might have misunderstood me. We currently play with all those things in. I was merely speculating the kind of things I'd like to see gone in a 4.5 version of the game. Of course the defenders would need something else to offset their loss, I just hate all the tracking 4e has. It's really the only thing I dislike about this version.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 12, 2013 - 6:56PM
#38
|
|
|
Oh. Sounds more like Essentials versions of characters then. I find chips/tokens very helpful for keeping track of everything. Then make several different sets. Maybe they would help.
Colors
Show
Bow down, my subjects, for I am your master! Yesss.....
Show
For some reason, none of my friends were surprised by this...
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 14, 2013 - 2:38PM
#39
|
Date Joined:
Feb 24, 2011
|
My 4.5 Wish List (Without just moving on to 5E) 1) Combat Speed - Combat simply takes too long. We've been conditioned by 30 odd years of video games and films to expect more fights more often with more enemies. That's fine, but 4e simply takes too long. Part of that is the breadth of powers at a PC's command, but the easier fix is to work monsters over. 1/2 general monster HP, but don't up the damage (Too much damage only encourages the 5-minute game day). 2-Hit Minions should be a viable option from the word go as well. 2) Updated Character Sheets - This ones a personal pet peeve. The current 4e sheets need a massive OFFICIAL overhaul. We need a dedicated space for Themes. We need an area to list our attack tables by each power. We need space to tally healing surges more cleanly. And so on. 3) Errata/Patches: Certain things need clean up and/or clarification:
- Feats need to be culled. Useless outdated ones removed. A reorganization in both print and digital forms.
- An Expertise Feat should be given gratis to a level 1 character. Improved Defenses to all characters at Paragon. You know, the general Math Fixes without paying Feat Taxes, and without needing to change everything at a fundamental level.
- Racial Powers should be updated to reflect the "highest ability modifier" use. They should also be erattaed to correct their massive scaling issues. They are not powers that should fall to the wayside.
- Classes such as Bladesinger, Seeker, and Binder should receive large scale re-writes or errata to address their utter failures. There's salvageable powers and lore behind them, but the core mechanics failed terribly.
- Beastmaster and other pet-using classes/themes etc need to be rebalanced to keep their pets more relevant and useful in battle. Mainly up their defenses and HP where possible.
- Alternative costs for Rituals, which at present are over cost for any group that needs them, or useless for groups that can afford them.
4) DDI Content: DRAGON should be reserved exclusively for new PC content. New themes, new powers, certain amount of prose, new races, Magic items (sans lore), and perhaps new Pre-made PCs each month with leveling plans and histories. DUNGEON is for Maps, Lairs, Puzzles, and all that stuff that PC's simply should not be concerned with (like the recent Tavern creation article, how is that a Dragon issue?) Seriously, this should be straightened out. There is also no excuse for their being months without actual PC content (IE: New powers, themes, or items) 5) Class Roles: Some clean up needs to happen here. A general improvement to each of the 4 roles could be dropped onto many of them without an issue.
- Strikers each need an in-class MBA baked in
- Defenders need an expansion to their punishment mechanics
- I will say this one is mainly because the -2 penalty doesn't RP well, and their defenses really are not that much better than most other non-controllers.
- Controllers need to impose some additional penalties (Universal Save Ends or Save penalties across the board vs Controller powers)
- Leaders need ...something. Not certain what.
6) New Content: This is mainly wishful thinking, but:
- Finish the Essentials builds: Autumn and Winter Sentinels, more Virtues and Vices, other pacts for Binder and Hexblade, throwing weapon Hunters, Transmute Mages, and so on.
- Arcane Archer subclass of anything but Wizard
- Elemental and Shadow power sources expanded to additional new classes/subclasses.
(at least cover all the roles, elemental healer, shadow defender and such)
- More powers and feats for under used classes (Swordmage, Artificer, basically all of PHB3)
- Continue monster race to PC race conversions (and some additional new races) and new feats for latter day races like Hengeyokai and such to make them more competitive.
- More Themes (Pet Tamer, sportsman, ambassador, other fun professions)
Some Ideas from elsewhere in the thread I Like: Fixing Magical items to be static and inherent bonuses added in across the board Baking in Math Fixes or Nerfing monsters appropriately Improving out-of-combat side of 4E, up to an including some major changes to skills. Definitely need dual sources for all skill checks. Too many are under/over valued currently. Real 5E ideas like Power source pools for all powers. Erasure of daily powers (especially from martial).
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 22, 2013 - 4:29AM
#40
|
Date Joined:
Aug 15, 2008
|
I've only run/played four D&D sessions, and in the last one I decided to have everyone's hit points halved (monsters and PCs - I don't understand why so many suggestions in this thread only refer to changing monster HP). Combat was much faster and more exciting. If I still felt it was slow, it was because the DM for this game seemed to take a while going through all the NPC's turns, but I think that will improve with time.
|
|
|