|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 9:11AM
#251
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2011
|
the errata don't correct the MINORS errors.
And the FQA are the official use of the rule not a rule Update.
The minor errors are typograghical (typos) that are corrected in reprints.
The FAQ specifically states that it DOESN'T use the official rules updates, therefore they are not official.
If the FAQ and the Primary source material, the rulebook, disagree, then unless it is stated in the errata, the primary source is the correct rule.
Primary Source and Errata will always trump the FAQ, Always!
So get that through your head: IF IT IS NOT IN THE PUBLISHED RULEBOOKS OR ERRATA THEN IT IS NOT AN OFFICIAL RULE!!!
FQA use the official rules read please, the FQA try to don't cover it because this issues are already resolved in the errata.
Scout
A scout has trapfinding but not Disable Device as a class
skill. Was this intentional?
The errata to CAd (found at
www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/welcom...)
indicates that Disable Device should be considered a class skill
for the scout.
Pepe pecas pica papas con un pico con un pico pepe pecas pica papas si pepe pecas pica papas con un pico donde esta el pico con que pepe pecas pica papas.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 10:00AM
#252
|
|
|
Oma, maybe you should read the part of the FAQ where it says it does not use official updated rules.
In addition the errata, the most official rules, outright stats that Primary Source and Errata are the only official rules.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 10:03AM
#253
|
Date Joined:
Sep 25, 2005
|
In addition the errata, the most official rules, outright stats that Primary Source and Errata are the only official rules.
**** it, MrC. If enough people just ignore him, eventually he'll get tired and troll on home.
"Today's headlines and history's judgment are rarely the same. If you are too attentive to the former, you will most certainly not do the hard work of securing the latter." -Condoleezza Rice
"My fellow Americans... I've just signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. Bombing begins in five minutes." - Ronald Reagan
This user has been brought to you by the letters "O-R-C" and the numbers "2, 3, 4, and 6"
Resident Pithed-Off Dragon
Buttler of the House of Trolls
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 10:08AM
#254
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2011
|
Oma, maybe you should read the part of the FAQ where it says it does not use official updated rules.
In addition the errata, the most official rules, outright stats that Primary Source and Errata are the only official rules.
the FQA say that don't cover the Issues not that dont use the official rules.
Pepe pecas pica papas con un pico con un pico pepe pecas pica papas si pepe pecas pica papas con un pico donde esta el pico con que pepe pecas pica papas.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 10:57AM
#255
|
|
|
the FQA say that don't cover the Issues not that dont use the official rules.[/quote]
Oma, that really doesn't matter because the Official Rules are Primary Source.
If the FAQ disagrees with a primary source, then unless it is covered in the errata, the primary source is correct.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 10:58AM
#256
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2011
|
the FQA say that don't cover the Issues not that dont use the official rules.
Oma, that really doesn't matter because the Official Rules are Primary Source.
If the FAQ disagrees with a primary source, then unless it is covered in the errata, the primary source is correct.
what primary source?????
put a example of a primary rule and the FQA
the FQA are at the same level of the errata are resourses of the game the same pag where are the official FQA of dungeon and dragons have the Errata and the FQA of Miniatures.
Pepe pecas pica papas con un pico con un pico pepe pecas pica papas si pepe pecas pica papas con un pico donde esta el pico con que pepe pecas pica papas.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 11:03AM
#257
|
|
|
Oma, Primary Source is the Rule Book in question.
Lets say were are looking at rules for Scrolls. The Dungeon Master Guide is the Primary Source. So rules in the Players Handbook, FAQ, Rules Discussions by Skip etc are all out there. Say some of these disagree. Which would be correct? Well unless it was updated in the Errata (official rules update) then the Primary Source Rule would make the Dungeon Master Guide the correct rule.
That makes the printed and published rulebooks and the Errata the only official rules.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 11:20AM
#258
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2011
|
Oma, Primary Source is the Rule Book in question.
Lets say were are looking at rules for Scrolls. The Dungeon Master Guide is the Primary Source. So rules in the Players Handbook, FAQ, Rules Discussions by Skip etc are all out there. Say some of these disagree. Which would be correct? Well unless it was updated in the Errata (official rules update) then the Primary Source Rule would make the Dungeon Master Guide the correct rule.
That makes the printed and published rulebooks and the Errata the only official rules.
sorry but the Errata only say if one of the player or monster manual have someting that not match with a rule of the dungeon master guide you use the rule of Dungeon master guide this rule dont cover the other books and afficial resources.
the other rule talk about dual description and say that in the case of 2 description don't match each other you take the full description instead of the short description as example the spells.
and the FQA are the official use of the rule, the FQA say how work the rules not make new ones.
Pepe pecas pica papas con un pico con un pico pepe pecas pica papas si pepe pecas pica papas con un pico donde esta el pico con que pepe pecas pica papas.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 11:51AM
#259
|
|
|
Oma, that is one example of the Primary Source rule. that statement is made on every single errata, it applies to all rules, sourcebooks and publications.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2013 - 12:32PM
#260
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2011
|
Oma, that is one example of the Primary Source rule. that statement is made on every single errata, it applies to all rules, sourcebooks and publications.
sorry but not, this statement not are in every single errata, and it apply to the rules yes and the FQA work over the rules and how use it.
Pepe pecas pica papas con un pico con un pico pepe pecas pica papas si pepe pecas pica papas con un pico donde esta el pico con que pepe pecas pica papas.
|
|
|
