|
7 months ago ::
Nov 01, 2012 - 9:55AM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Aug 24, 2010
|
Did anyone else notice this?
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 01, 2012 - 12:43PM
#2
|
|
|
You mean the thing about being drunk giving you 1d6 damage reduction and disadvantage on everything? That's been in from day one! The devs made drunken brawling before they designed fighters!
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 01, 2012 - 12:46PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Dec 12, 2009
|
How much damage is an unarmed attack? Because with disadvantage and 1d6 dr I feel like a tavern brawl could last a week.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 01, 2012 - 12:53PM
#4
|
|
|
How much damage is an unarmed attack? Because with disadvantage and 1d6 dr I feel like a tavern brawl could last a week.
That it could lad......that it could.
My two copper.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 01, 2012 - 12:56PM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Jun 17, 2010
|
How much damage is an unarmed attack? Because with disadvantage and 1d6 dr I feel like a tavern brawl could last a week.
That it could lad......that it could.
Blazing Saddles anyone?
D&D Next = D&D: Quantum Edition
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 01, 2012 - 7:50PM
#6
|
|
|
The rules also initially didn't originally impose any penalty on spellcasting, meaning it was generally beneficial for wizards to be drunk in combat.
Dwarves invented beer so they could toast to their axes. Dwarves invented axes to kill people and take their beer.
"Feel free to claim I said anything you like. How's someone going to call you out on it? Are they going to be all like, 'I know all of the things that Gary said, and that's not one of them?'"
- Gary Gygax
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 02, 2012 - 11:20AM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Aug 24, 2010
|
but all the scholars are winos, so that makes perfect sense...
|
|
|
