Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 11  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Does Anyone Care About the Monk (really?)
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:06PM #1
Zardnaar
Date Joined: Apr 15, 2001
Posts: 8,354
Personally I have a purely irrational hatred of the Monk. One ran over my cat- true story honest. I did not really like them in 1st ed let alone third ed. They are also the worst class in Pathfinder and my apathy towards them in 4th ed means I know they were a striker and that was about it. I like the gunslinger class in PF better than a Monk. Even if they had full BAB, level 9 spells and wildshape I would still dislike them.

 As I said purely irrational. I'm not a massive fan of 4th ed either (I don't hate it had some pure gold in there) but I like 4th ed better than the Monk. Other people have these things called "opinions" and some of them disagree with me even. Stupid democratic ideals and all that. Anyway I was hoping D&DN would have all of the 3.5 core classes and the 4th ed core classes of Warlord and Warlock but that adds up to 13 classes and thats a messy number. 12 is a much nicer number and if they have to cut a class I would nominate the Monk based purely on irrational dislike of the stupid class. Class number 2 to cut would be the Warlord although I did actually like the class in 4th ed as it seems a but redundent with Bards and Paladins floating around and with no leader mechanic in DDN. On the plus side for the Warlord though at least the class is not a Monk.

 World War II and the Nazis? Monk did it. The cold war, Monks fault. Disease, plague, death, Spiceworld movie and Britney Spears blame the Monk. 4th ed/Pathfinder depending on what side of the fence you like the Monk seems to be an obvious scapegoat IMHO.
Reducing a character to a list of dice rolls and modifiers is not role playing*

*pg 30, AD&D 2nd Ed DMG, 1989.
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:08PM #2
Salla
Date Joined: Apr 3, 2003
Posts: 23,524
You Godwinned yourself in your initial post.  Well done.
Another day, another three or four entries to my Ignore List.
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:09PM #3
Zardnaar
Date Joined: Apr 15, 2001
Posts: 8,354
 I do my best.
Reducing a character to a list of dice rolls and modifiers is not role playing*

*pg 30, AD&D 2nd Ed DMG, 1989.
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:16PM #4
Steely_Dan
Date Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Posts: 8,628
The Monk is my all-time favourite class, has been since 1st Ed, I have already done a monk conversion (using the 1st and 3rd Ed monk) for 5th Ed; that's one of the things I really dig about 5th Ed: it's very conversion friendly, next I'm working on Incarnates and Truenamers.
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:19PM #5
Garthanos
Date Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Posts: 17,775
Well as long as the fighter is competant unnarmed and capable of specializing in that even, who cares if one has a monk...

Improvisation in 4e: Improv. Attacks(by wrecan) - Fave 4E Improvisations

The Non-combatant Adventurer

Reality is unrealistic - and even monkeys protest unfairness

Dynamic Reflavoring : The Fighter : The Wizard : The Swordmage
Creative Character Collection - Featuring:The Faerie Master - Snow White - Joxer - Ironman - Elric - Bloodwright

By virtue of being a player your characters are the protagonists in a heroic fantasy game even at level one

"You have to explicitly give non-casters permission to do awesome, where as with magic it is just assumed they can." -Garthanos

Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:20PM #6
DemoMonkey
Date Joined: Feb 19, 2009
Posts: 916
I find that blame list highly offensive and out of line, and I am deeply offended.







You can't just go blaming someone for Spice World like that!
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:23PM #7
Samrin
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Posts: 6,882
The 4e monk is actually pretty awesome and gives its own unique take on the AEDU mechanic. The Full Discipline. 

The 13th Age Monk takes this idea and goes straight into incredible with it.  
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:26PM #8
Steely_Dan
Date Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Posts: 8,628

Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:19PM, Garthanos wrote:

Well as long as the fighter is competant unnarmed and capable of specializing in that even, who cares if one has a monk...





Fighters don't have increased speed, can't talk to animals & plants, don't have extra resistance to ESP/mental attacks, cannot fall great distances unharmed, self-heal, etc, etc.

Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:33PM #9
gothikaiju
Date Joined: Apr 28, 2009
Posts: 548
I love the Monk. It was  my favorite PH class in AD&D, I was disappointed by it's Pathfinder incarnation, and the Monk is my almost-most played class in 4E.

I would like it if Fighters, and other melee classes, could be competent in unarmed combat with just a specialty... but, to me, a Monk needs missile deflection, the ability to teleport/fly short distances, self-healing, slow fall etc.
Quick Reply
Cancel
7 months ago  ::  Oct 29, 2012 - 12:38PM #10
DemoMonkey
Date Joined: Feb 19, 2009
Posts: 916
"but, to me, a Monk needs missile deflection, the ability to teleport/fly short distances, self-healing, slow fall etc."

Based on discussions in other threads, I believe it is Garthanos' position that a heroic fighter should be able to do all of those things listed, and thus a distinct "monk" class would not be required.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 11  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing