Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Dragon 416 is out...
8 months ago  ::  Oct 11, 2012 - 4:22PM #11
frothsof
Date Joined: Jun 4, 2010
Posts: 10,490
crimson wick ki focus is awesome on multi-attack monks or even executioners if you are throwing out shurikens. i have a hybrid monk/vamp that i was using cascading strikes for but now im not so sure, especially mid paragon on, i have so many multi-attacks
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 11, 2012 - 10:03PM #12
Mengu74
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 3,247
Misshapen is an interesting (and rare) theme that works for monks who have a free hand. Most monks have their hands full, but this theme might just be enough to actually build and enjoy playing a monk with a free hand.

Haunted Blade might be interesting for some non-tiefling Paladins and Battleminds.

These are not total wastes of space... There are even powers that were written well, as though someone was paying attention and cared, like the timing of the immobilize on Haunted Blade's Blade of Nightmares.

Vampire items are rather pedestrian. Not sure I see anything worthwhile there.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 11, 2012 - 10:31PM #13
Scatterbrained
Date Joined: Aug 31, 2009
Posts: 2,590
If something has to move "up to it's speed," doesn't that imply it can move less than it's speed?  Like 0 squares?
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 12, 2012 - 2:58AM #14
svendj
Date Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Posts: 2,052
Misshapen seems best on defenders. Is it good for Brawler Fighters? It's been a while since I played mine. It's the only encounter power for them that offers a grab that lasts more than one round. Altered Extremity (+1 reach for a round) is hilarious with grab attacks. 

The theme also nice for non-teleporting Swordmages who want some more control and an awesome OA. Although grabbing with your free hand does reduce your AC by 2.

Not impressed with the Vampire ki foci. Rain of Hammers is still loads better.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 12, 2012 - 4:30AM #15
Herid_Fel
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 2,565

Oct 11, 2012 -- 10:31PM, Scatterbrained wrote:

If something has to move "up to its speed," doesn't that imply it can move less than its speed?  Like 0 squares?




Heh, you've made an excellent point. That's worth posting errata about.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 12, 2012 - 4:46AM #16
erachima
Date Joined: Sep 4, 2010
Posts: 7,679
It must move, which is defined by going from one square into another. Moving 0 squares isn't moving, so it can go a minimum of 1.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 12, 2012 - 8:11AM #17
AtG
Date Joined: Feb 1, 2010
Posts: 1,266

Oct 11, 2012 -- 2:26PM, kilpatds wrote:

Misshapen: You have a really big arm.  e1 is a grab that can be used during an OA.  the f10 increases forced movement distance (from melee attacks) by one.  The u6 he's refering two is an end-of-encounter daily that gives +2 AC&Fort, but far more importantly: "In addition, when any enemy ends its turn adjacent to you, it must use a free action to move up to its speed away from you"




nice....

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 13, 2012 - 1:39AM #18
gomibako_ninja
Date Joined: Jan 12, 2006
Posts: 16
Does Misshapen U6 activate the Pursuit Avenger's damage bonus? If so, does that make it worth being a Pursuit Avenger at all?
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 13, 2012 - 10:05AM #19
kilpatds
Date Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Posts: 4,981
"If your oath of enmity target moves away from you willingly", so probably not.  Ask your DM.
"Nice assumptions. Completely wrong assumptions, but by jove if being incorrect stopped people from making idiotic statements, we wouldn't have modern internet subculture." Kerrus

Practical gameplay runs by neither RAW or RAI, but rather "A Compromise Between The Gist Of The Rule As I Recall Getting The Impression Of It That One Time I Read It And What Jerry Says He Remembers, Whatever, We'll Look It Up Later If Any Of Us Still Give A Damn." Erachima
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 13, 2012 - 10:56AM #20
tsuyoshikentsu
Date Joined: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 2,876

Oct 12, 2012 -- 4:46AM, erachima wrote:

It must move, which is defined by going from one square into another. Moving 0 squares isn't moving, so it can go a minimum of 1.



Source? I ask because this would directly affect the viability of a number of Thief tactics, among what I suspect would be many other examples.

On the CO IRC, generally as TorpedoFish.

Vain? Me?  NEVER. Show

Mar 19, 2010 -- 6:09PM, lordduskblade wrote:

You're the straightest shooter I know on these boards. You don't mince words about your opinions, and I respect that about you. The whole fiasco you described in the last State of the CO Forum was particularly enlightening (and kind of disappointing with regards to how they see us).

Mar 26, 2010 -- 12:33AM, Khan_the_Destroyer wrote:

Ah, Tsuyo. When your post isn't one sentence long full of asterisks, you have much wisdom to share with us .

From the IRC:

(19:52) RuinsFate: You know, I was gonna agree with something PalOn said... but I think I'm just gonna through my lot in with tsuyo's sudden train-wreck grade interjection.

(01:45) Nausicaa: yes your rage is a righteous rage :D
(01:45) Nausicaa: righteous rage of torpedo



My sci-fi writing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing