|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 12:48AM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Dec 10, 2008
|
You're in combat with a dastardly villain. He grabs the all-important MacGuffin from the nearby altar and shoves it in his belt pouch. You trade sword blows, but you know you need that MacGuffin. You don't need to kill this guy -- you just need that MacGuffin. How can you grab it from him? *** What house rule would you allow to let a player grab an object from someone's belt/backpack/pocket in combat? Sleight of Hand comes to mind, but there is no stealth involved here -- it's just brute-force grabbing an object. All suggestions appreciated  Thanks, -Darakonis
The D&D Digest: DM & Player guides. Product reviews & new releases. D&D Resources. Quick video tips. Watch the live-streamed adventures of a virtual gaming group: Dungeons & Drogans.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 1:17AM
#2
|
|
|
Standard action to grab. Unarmed attack vs AC. Alternatively, with a brawler fighter, who gets an off-hand grab attack, that could be used, with the villain getting a saving throw. Save means villain and PC are now both grabbing each other, and STR vs Fort to win& break free.
Make sure villain has a good neee-ner neee-Ner Neeeeee-Nerrrr speach or two.
Colors
Show
Bow down, my subjects, for I am your master! Yesss.....
Show
For some reason, none of my friends were surprised by this...
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 4:07AM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Nov 13, 2004
|
I'd make it an unarmed attack vs Reflex that provokes an Opportunity Attack (a successful hit would ruin the snatch attempt). If the player comes up with a clever way of snatching the item, however, I'd let a successful skill check bypass the OA (such as using Acrobatics to slide between the enemy's legs before snatching the item away). Just going for the item in a straightforward manner, though? The enemy's gonna know exactly what you're trying to do and punish you for it.
BTW, there's never any reason you have to kill someone over an item. KO your enemy, take the MacGuffin and his coin purse, and then draw something obscene on his forehead.
4e D&D is not a "Tabletop MMO." It is not Massively Multiplayer, and is usually not played Online. Come up with better descriptions of your complaints, cuz this one means jack ****.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 5:36AM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Oct 28, 2010
|
Sounds like an in-combat skill challenge, stealth, (or bluff) thievery, acrobatics.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 5:59AM
#5
|
|
|
Thievery opposed by Insight or Perception might be the simplest way, but I wouldn't allow a player to try it until the big bad is at a certain HP ratio (say down to 1/4). Happy Gaming
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 6:11AM
#6
|
|
|
i would really try to avoid a skill challenge, but thats just my opinion. i would probably have the guy make an attack or a hard check as a standard action one round to try and grab the item; so at that point both of them are fighting for control of it. next round, unless he has been forced-moved away, or the villain originally holding the item has done something else to get rid of the guy trying to take it on his turn, i would likely have the guy grabbing it use a standard action to make a str vs fort or possibly acr or thievery vs ref check, similar to escaping a grab. if he succeeded in taking the item i probably wouldnt let him move that turn, or move very far on the same turn
imo you would have to make something like this somewhat challenging to pull off, but i personally would rather just rule it on the fly than use a skill challenge-that sucks the life out of it for me
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 8:39AM
#7
|
- Forum Guide
- Hero Craftsman Gold Medalist
- Master Dungeon Master
Date Joined:
Jun 23, 2005
|
I agree with frothsof. This isn't so complicated that a skill challenge is needed. It's a grab. Make a grab check against the villain. I'd say you have to make an unarmed attack first and hit, and then make opposed Athletics or Thievery checks (each side chooses their own check).
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 9:04AM
#8
|
Date Joined:
Sep 19, 2007
|
Wouldn't dazing, stunning, or dominating the guy make this very easy?
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 29, 2012 - 10:10AM
#9
|
|
|
Wouldn't dazing, stunning, or dominating the guy make this very easy?
not if hes one of my solos it wont! 
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jul 01, 2012 - 12:00AM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Dec 10, 2008
|
Thanks for all the suggestions! I've combined them to make the following, which is what I'll likely use: Snatch: Standard Action Target: You can attempt to snatch a readily accessible object off a creature, such as a sheathed weapon, a coin purse, or a holy symbol. The creature must be within your melee reach (don't count extra reach from a weapon). Dexterity Attack: Make a Dexterity attack vs. Reflex. Do not add any weapon modifiers. You must have at least one hand free to make a snatch attempt. Hit: The object has been removed from the creature and is held in your hand. Opportunity Attack: A snatch attempt provokes an Opportunity Attack from your enemy. If the attack hits you, your snatch attempt fails and your action is lost.
The D&D Digest: DM & Player guides. Product reviews & new releases. D&D Resources. Quick video tips. Watch the live-streamed adventures of a virtual gaming group: Dungeons & Drogans.
|
|
|
