|
13 months ago ::
May 23, 2012 - 6:38AM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Feb 17, 2008
|
A question for everyone.
How do you regard mindlinking in 3.5 and to a lesser extent, the telepathy of 4e Kalashtar? Did (or do) you rule it as deeply intimate and personal? Or did your Kalashtar use their mindlink and telepathy more casually?
The reason why I'm asking is that personally, I see mind linking as an intimate affair. Like in the scene in Babylon 5 when Lyta's replacement tried to describe to one of the characters what happens when two telepaths make love.
Author of Elementalism in Atlas Games' Occult Lore. 
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
May 23, 2012 - 1:46PM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Jun 16, 2004
|
Quite casual. "Voice in head" sort of thing.
Gold is for the mistress, silver for the maid Copper for the craftsman, cunning at his trade." "Good!" said the Baron, sitting in his hall, "But Iron -- Cold Iron -- is master of them all." -Kipling Defenders: We ARE the wall! I've replaced the previous Edition Warring line in my sig with this one, because honestly, everybody needs to work together to make the D&D they like without trampling on somebody else's D&D. Miss d20 Modern? Take a look at Dias Ex Machina Game's UltraModern 4e! I am a hero, not a chump.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
May 23, 2012 - 2:34PM
#3
|
|
|
Quite casual. "Voice in head" sort of thing.
Basically this.
Casual converstion like in Young Justice. However, I would allow a deeper more intimate connection like Liara from Mass Effect. It would come from character development and be related to that.
|
|
|
