Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 4 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Switch to Forum Live View what book should have magic items.
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 7:02AM #31
Azzy1974
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2011
Posts: 851

May 22, 2012 -- 11:16PM, Salla wrote:

May 22, 2012 -- 11:12PM, Azzy1974 wrote:

DMG.

Magic items shouldn't be a commodity that PCs require to maintain balance or feel entitled to--they should be fun rewards and/or plot points.




Which has exactly squat to do with where they're found in the books.




Well, if magical items are not part of the expected baseline for chracter balance and it's possible to run a game without their inclusion, then it makes sense for them not to be in the PHB. Not only does that free up a good deal of space in the PHB for more player resources, it also allows DMs to have the option to keep magic items in the realm of "mystery and awe" instead commonplace and mundane should they choose.

They should be in the PHB for the same reason the spells and class and race abilities and every other piece of equipment the PCs have is there; there will generally be multiple PHBs floating around a table, but usually only one DMG.  If a player needs to look up something his character can do, it'll be a lot easier for him to do so if he doesn't have to ask the DM for his book in the middle of whatever, or make the DM stop and read it to him.  He can easily look it up between turns, or while another player is doing his thing.




However, if magic items aren't necessary for the balancing of the game, they're not required to be a player resource or for players to have a crap-tonne of them (potentially requiring frequent reference to be less necessary). Inclusion in the PHB, again, also causes the exclusion of other potentional options for players--be that more races, classes, powers/spells, themes, backgrounds, feats, combat options, playing advices, etc.

Also, asking the DM (or whoever else that may have it) to hand over the DMG is no more disruptive than asking to pass the Spell Compendium (or other resource) for asking to borrow more dice to roll your sneak attack, spell/power damage or whatever. While the goal of trying to minimize the amount of books necessary for a player to reference in-game is a noble goal, trying to keep it to one book, or even to books that there will always be multiples of, is something of an object lesson in futility as splatbooks will make a quick death of that.

There's also the 'if a player wants to make a magic item, he'll need to know what it is he can make' thing as well.




As the ability for PCs to craft magic items looks like it may be entirely optional, so that's not a strong argument for putting them in the PHB.

EDIT: WotC, please replace your forum software with something that doesn't suck.

Playtest or get off the playtest boards.

---

I want justice for the voice that can't be heard
Vindication for every suffering and hurt
Let retribution hold dominion over earth
--Nemesis, VNV Nation
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 7:10AM #32
Kaldric
Date Joined: Oct 5, 2002
Posts: 2,618
Should WotC decide to put the magic items in the PHB, the first thing I'll do as DM is change all the numbers and names and abilities so the information is useless, or, in fact, lethally misleading. Because I hate players, and want them to fail and quit my game so I can't play anymore. Or because the feeling of discovery is quite possibly the most enjoyable part of the game for me and my friends. One or the other. 
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 7:26AM #33
Maxperson
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 22,451

May 22, 2012 -- 9:42PM, Balfore wrote:

I did a search and couldn't find a mention of this so here goes. What book do you think magic items should be in. I prefer them in the DMG. I like to surprise the players. I felt 4th got away from that.




Definately the DMG.

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 9:00AM #34
halvgrim
Date Joined: Jan 12, 2012
Posts: 448
I would like to play a low magic game where weapons are mysterious and unpurchasable.

Therefore I would like the items to go in the DMG. 

 
DISCLAIMER: I never played 4ed, so I may misunderstand some of the rules.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 9:15AM #35
Neutronium_Dragon
Date Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 5,778
> The first might be to have common items, the very basic magic
> items in the PHB.
>
> Meanwhile, anything uncommon or rare could be in the DMG

  I agree with Salla's viewpoint: putting things that the players will end up using (regardless of how they're obtained) in the DMG is a bad idea for logistical reasons, and all of the nostalgia in the world doesn't change that.


  But besides that point, the one thing I'd really want is for the collectibles-rarity approach (and terminology) to die in a fire.

  That won't happen in Next, by the look of things. Maybe in The One After That...
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 9:25AM #36
Qmark
  • vitriol and virtue
Date Joined: May 18, 2002
Posts: 16,487

May 23, 2012 -- 9:19AM, Lord_Daxl wrote:

However, as you further mentioned, in practice it's rather pointless.  If a player wants to see a magic item list, he's either gonna buy the DMG or flip through it at the bookstore, whether or not the DM wants him to see them.


Let's not pretend, for any amount of time, that the DMG is a sacred tome of forbidden lore.

The DMG is the appropriate place for magical swag, simply because it's the appropriate place for describing the placement and purpose any other adventuring rewards.

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 9:26AM #37
Wuzzard
Date Joined: Apr 5, 2001
Posts: 196
DMG

Magic items should be lost, historic relics, found as a by product of adventuring in exotic locales. At least by default. If your group prefers the magic mart model then by all means, put them up for sale in every mercantile and bakery.

Magic items should never be part of anyone's character concept, and should not be required by the math to play the game. You should feel grateful for finding that tuning fork of ear-splitting thunder, no matter what character you have envisioned.





Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 9:39AM #38
Jim11735
Date Joined: Jun 1, 2009
Posts: 1,512
DMG.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 9:47AM #39
Garthanos
Date Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Posts: 17,667

May 23, 2012 -- 9:00AM, halvgrim wrote:

I would like to play a low magic game where weapons are mysterious and unpurchasable.

Therefore I would like the items to go in the DMG. 

 




So, I guess everyone gets to be a monk?

Improvisation in 4e: Improv. Attacks(by wrecan) - Fave 4E Improvisations

The Non-combatant Adventurer

Reality is unrealistic - and even monkeys protest unfairness

Dynamic Reflavoring : The Fighter : The Wizard : The Swordmage
Creative Character Collection - Featuring:The Faerie Master - Snow White - Joxer - Ironman - Elric - Bloodwright

By virtue of being a player your characters are the protagonists in a heroic fantasy game even at level one

"You have to explicitly give non-casters permission to do awesome, where as with magic it is just assumed they can." -Garthanos

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 23, 2012 - 10:01AM #40
Maxperson
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 22,451

May 23, 2012 -- 9:47AM, Garthanos wrote:

May 23, 2012 -- 9:00AM, halvgrim wrote:

I would like to play a low magic game where weapons are mysterious and unpurchasable.

Therefore I would like the items to go in the DMG. 

 




So, I guess everyone gets to be a monk?




You can purchase monks

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 4 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing