Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 3  •  1 2 3 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Dungeon Survival Handbook Discussion
1 year ago  ::  May 15, 2012 - 6:27PM #1
Fox_Reeveheart
Date Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: 794
So the book is out, so thus discussion can't go into the "future releases" forum.  ANYWAYS!

I would like to know for those who got the book what you think of it.  Reviews would be lovely.

I really REALLY want to see all thats offered for kobolds besides just what we saw in the excerpt (unless that was everything).  Also, with all 3 races shown being small, is there any feats needing small size required in the book? 
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 4:16AM #2
Chimpy20
Date Joined: Mar 16, 2011
Posts: 469
I got this a couple of days ago primarily for the content relevant to DMs, so I have to admit I didn't look at the player stuff in too much detail. I really like the presentation and the thought that has gone into the product.

There are quite a few nice ideas for making dungeons and styles of dungeons. However, I would have liked to have seen more detail in there. I would say it's great for novice DMs, but as someone with some experience making dungeons, I was hoping for some more dungeon elements I could add to give more interest to my dungeonsm, perhaps some puzzles or RP ideas.

There's a section of types of monsters found in dungeons, and a section giving background on some classic dungeons (ravenloft, temple of elemental  evil etc..) which is nice but hardly essential reading.

So I'm a little disappointed with the DM parts of the book. However, a good 2/3 of the book is relating to players, which as I mentioned, I haven't really looked at.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 4:35AM #3
DanTracker
Date Joined: Jun 8, 2009
Posts: 876
My initial review is positive. I like the book and contents. I have yet to sit down for a comprehensive perusal.

One opening comment of a small (miniscule really) negative critique is that while they are adding small captions to pictures and often giving names to characters, none of the kobold or goblin images are named characters. Do they not deserve for someone to offer a name to those races of adventurers? In fact, the first piece of goblin adventurer art has the goblin looking away into the background rather than providing a face to the character as she gets toe-to-toe with a hook horror. I'm glad these two races were included particularly since I use them in my homebrew setting as tolerated and accepted cultures of the overall society. So, I'm a bit sad that little of the art was dedicated to those two races (less to goblin than to kobold).  
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 5:14AM #4
thespaceinvader
Date Joined: Oct 28, 2010
Posts: 9,659
It looks fairly meh to me.  Read quickly through tyhe player options yesterday, wasn't wildly impressed.  Old design mistakes coming out to the fore, fairly unimpressive and uninteresting themes and powers.  I doubt I'll be buying it.
Harrying your Prey, the Easy Way: A Hunter's Handbook - the first of what will hopefully be many CharOp efforts on my part.
The Blinker - teleport everywhere. An Eladrin Knight/Eldritch Knight.

CB != rules source.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 6:31AM #5
frothsof
Date Joined: Jun 4, 2010
Posts: 10,486
the themes are just god awful imo.

after looking at the powers in the compendium i am having second thoughts on buying this. the only power i like is the seeker encounter


Spoiler: Show
Short Shot Onslaught

Your time spent underground has forced you to adapt to skirmishing in close quarters.


Encounter        Primal, Weapon
Standard Action      Close burst 3


Target: One, two, or three creatures in the burst


Attack: Wisdom vs. AC


Hit: 1[W] + Wisdom modifier damage.


Effect: After all of this power’s attacks are resolved, you can use a free action to shift up to 2 squares for each attack that hit. You ignore difficult terrain during this movement




i cant comment on the rest of it

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 7:11AM #6
Matt_James
Date Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Posts: 709
I think the book is amazing. Then again, I'm completely bias Innocent


Matt James
Freelance Game Designer
Loremaster.org


Follow me on Twitter!
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 7:26AM #7
Seeker95
  • Reasonably Disagreeable
Date Joined: Oct 24, 2001
Posts: 9,933

May 16, 2012 -- 7:11AM, Matt_James wrote:

I think the book is amazing. Then again, I'm completely bias 



Well, the best parts are of course the ones you worked on.

Here are the PHB essentia, in my opinion:
  • Three Basic Rules (p 11)
  • Power Types and Usage (p 54)
  • Skills (p178-179)
  • Feats (p 192)
  • Rest and Recovery (p 263)
  • All of Chapter 9 [Combat] (p 264-295)

A player needs to read the sections for building his or her character -- race, class, powers, feats, equipment, etc. But those are PC-specific. The above list is for everyone, regardless of the race or class or build or concept they are playing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 7:45AM #8
RickDeckard
Date Joined: Feb 23, 2012
Posts: 178
bloodsworn had a nice punisher/demon hunter from diablo feel to it for any kind of a class. I'm diggining that theme and definitely using it for my encounters character for this season.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 7:51AM #9
GelatinousOctahedron
Date Joined: Jun 30, 2008
Posts: 5,740
The races are pretty decent.  Nice to have small options for strength and wisdom stats finally.  It would be better if they had the support that older races got.

Most of the themes are pretty bad either super situational or just not very good, except for underdark outcast and bloodsworn.  A few are so close to being good, but fail at math its painful. 

As spacedinvader says above WOTC doesn't learn from its math mistakes and is still repeating them years later.  Who is going to take Underdark envoy for instance?  You need to be charisma primary and ok with attacking at range for the encounter power to work, which eliminates the vast majority of PCs.  And even if you do that it still doesn't scale right since there is no weapon or implement keyword so no expertise bonus.  As is only ranged bards going for lots of social skills are the only ones who should even look at it and even they have better options.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 16, 2012 - 8:13AM #10
mboss77
Date Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Posts: 1,108

May 16, 2012 -- 7:51AM, GelatinousOctahedron wrote:

The races are pretty decent.  Nice to have small options for strength and wisdom stats finally.  It would be better if they had the support that older races got.

Most of the themes are pretty bad either super situational or just not very good, except for underdark outcast and bloodsworn.  A few are so close to being good, but fail at math its painful. 

As spacedinvader says above WOTC doesn't learn from its math mistakes and is still repeating them years later.  Who is going to take Underdark envoy for instance?  You need to be charisma primary and ok with attacking at range for the encounter power to work, which eliminates the vast majority of PCs.  And even if you do that it still doesn't scale right since there is no weapon or implement keyword so no expertise bonus.  As is only ranged bards going for lots of social skills are the only ones who should even look at it and even they have better options.


so disappointing

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  1 2 3 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing