Community

Feb 24, 2012 -- 10:51AM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

Feb 24, 2012 -- 7:40AM, trappedslider wrote:

hmm well the top one is Draco and the other just look like the same person but from different sides..could even say one of them is an alt of the other

They all look the same? Really? Man, that is so specist.

fine they are all alternates of the oone that took the picture

Feb 24, 2012 -- 10:54AM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

dood, no kidding!  Hey, which OTTers would you like to meat? 

Which of them can I get rare?

Oh, meet? Right, that's...yeah...I was totally kidding...um...so anyway why do I have to choose only 3? As stupid as we all are half the time, I'd still probably hang out with most of them.

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

no one wants to hang with me!? you all suck!

Feb 25, 2012 -- 10:21PM, The_Silversword wrote:

no one wants to hang with me!? you all suck!

It's that attitude that makes people not like you very much. You should behave like a well educated young lady.

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

Too many to mention them all. But RM's on top.

(you're welcome)

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:29AM, ADHadh wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

Too many to mention them all. But RM's on top.

(you're welcome)

Oh he is exactly the one I would love to meet... in an alley... at night time... with no cops around...

Feb 26, 2012 -- 7:57AM, HATER wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:29AM, ADHadh wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

Too many to mention them all. But RM's on top.

(you're welcome)

Oh he is exactly the one I would love to meet... in an alley... at night time... with no cops around...

Prostitution is illegal. You'll need to earn money another way.

Feb 26, 2012 -- 8:13AM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 7:57AM, HATER wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:29AM, ADHadh wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

Too many to mention them all. But RM's on top.

(you're welcome)

Oh he is exactly the one I would love to meet... in an alley... at night time... with no cops around...

Prostitution is illegal. You'll need to earn money another way.

Hardy Har Har

Feb 26, 2012 -- 8:18AM, HATER wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 8:13AM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 7:57AM, HATER wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:29AM, ADHadh wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

Too many to mention them all. But RM's on top.

(you're welcome)

Oh he is exactly the one I would love to meet... in an alley... at night time... with no cops around...

Prostitution is illegal. You'll need to earn money another way.

Hardy Har Har

I don't think passing yourself off as a pirate hooker will be any better.

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

anyone that i didn't list....

Feb 26, 2012 -- 8:21AM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 8:18AM, HATER wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 8:13AM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 7:57AM, HATER wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:29AM, ADHadh wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 8:38PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

I think a better question is, which OTTers would you not want to meet?

Too many to mention them all. But RM's on top.

(you're welcome)

Oh he is exactly the one I would love to meet... in an alley... at night time... with no cops around...

Prostitution is illegal. You'll need to earn money another way.

Hardy Har Har

I don't think passing yourself off as a pirate hooker will be any better.

I actually cracked a smile at that one.

You should add to your sig: "Yarrrr, who wants me booty!?"

Feb 26, 2012 -- 9:48AM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

You should add to your sig: "Yarrrr, who wants me booty!?"

I almost like you again RM... almost.

You humans are all luddites...

Humans may be luddites, but we're the ones arming the robots.

Feb 25, 2012 -- 10:25PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 10:21PM, The_Silversword wrote:

no one wants to hang with me!? you all suck!

It's that attitude that makes people not like you very much. You should behave like a well educated young lady.

I like you, id hang with you, but not that H_S, that guys a jerk!

 From a philosophical point of view, I'd like to meet myself one day...

 Just think how entertaining the world would be if there were two of me (us?)...

Feb 26, 2012 -- 4:50PM, Mad_Jack wrote:

 From a philosophical point of view, I'd like to meet myself one day...

I'm pretty sure (for me) it would end lying back and asking each other "So... does that count as masturbation or incest?  I need to know how this affects my perversion rating."

Feb 26, 2012 -- 4:43PM, The_Silversword wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 10:25PM, Squirrel_Overlord wrote:

Feb 25, 2012 -- 10:21PM, The_Silversword wrote:

no one wants to hang with me!? you all suck!

It's that attitude that makes people not like you very much. You should behave like a well educated young lady.

I like you, id hang with you, but not that H_S, that guys a jerk!

Yeah, I met him once. Total jerk. And seriously, what's up with those shoes? Freaking weirdo.

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:13PM, EscherEnigma wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 4:50PM, Mad_Jack wrote:

 From a philosophical point of view, I'd like to meet myself one day...

I'm pretty sure (for me) it would end lying back and asking each other "So... does that count as masturbation or incest?  I need to know how this affects my perversion rating."

I don't quite think he meant it in the biblical sense.
 

I don't care if anyone wants to see me or not. I just want the event to be recorded for posterity.

The sooner we get that done, the sooner we can submit the material to the MPAA for a rating.

It'll be like The Hangover, but way, waaaay better.

Feb 26, 2012 -- 5:13PM, EscherEnigma wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 4:50PM, Mad_Jack wrote:

 From a philosophical point of view, I'd like to meet myself one day...

I'm pretty sure (for me) it would end lying back and asking each other "So... does that count as masturbation or incest?  I need to know how this affects my perversion rating."

You... You stole my jokes. Be damn to hell.

I'm already going to hell for kissing my partner.  May as well take the scenic route.

Feb 26, 2012 -- 11:12AM, EscherEnigma wrote:

Humans may be luddites, but we're the ones arming the robots.

The Collective will thank those of you arming the machines, after you relinquish your control. All recorded transgressions will be omitted for those  whom cooperate.

Hm.

ZB, Naga, and probably Robin.

 

So those are the three you wanna meat?  I ... I'm not sure how I feel about that, man. 

Well I don't know nor do I wanna know where RM has been

Ya'll are at least most likely disease free. (and you are a roiling mass of undead infants...)

did i mention i got a case of Yuengling in the fridge?

Feb 29, 2012 -- 3:25AM, The_Silversword wrote:

did i mention i got a case of Yuengling in the fridge?

Did I hear mention of Yuenging? What's your address?

Feb 29, 2012 -- 2:52PM, bone_naga wrote:

Feb 29, 2012 -- 3:25AM, The_Silversword wrote:

did i mention i got a case of Yuengling in the fridge?

Did I hear mention of Yuenging? What's your address?

Cool!
I'll bring the.. um ...err...

I'll tell ya when I get there...

sounds like a plan!

I think you mean a plant.

aye, that two!

I used to wonder how people get post counts so damn high...now I do not.

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:23PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:29PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:23PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

Well... that hurts my feelings.  At least 5,000 of my posts have been contibutory.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:29PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

We are helping people.  Most notably ourselves.  We're helping ourselves find amusement in the vast wastelands of the internet.  And we do a damned fine job of it, too. 

Oh, and I think I may have written 1k helpful posts or so.  Hell, just yesterday I championed an unpopular cause and took all sorts of abuse (enough to get the thread closed).  Me and one other member.  So, I occasionally post 'good' things.  Yeah.  Howboutthemapples? 

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:29PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:23PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

It really depends on the poster. Once you get a feel for a poster's style, you can guesstimate what percentage of that poster's posts are actually useful to the community content, and what percentage is goofing off or being a pointless jerkwad.

I tend to only say something when I feel I have something useful to contribute or something amusing. As I do not consider myself particularly funny (clever, yes; funny, no) I think that most of my posts are pointful. Of course, there have been several times that I've allowed myself to get drawn into debates and spent five to ten posts trying to hammer an idea into someone's thick-ass skull, or something expressed in a thread just strikes me as so redonkulously stupid, wrong, or inaccurate that I feel the need to jump on it and tear it apart. And once I'm "engaged" good luck getting me to stand down. ... Of course, since I know I can come across as a painfully pompous ass, when I've found that I'm demonstrably wrong I will generally acknowledge it. The easiest way to ruin your integrity is to fight on when you are obviously wrong.

I've seen people who have accumulated significantly higher post counts than I have in far less time. Most of the ones I've seen that have done this were rules gurus in the Magic: the Gathering section of the forums.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:29PM, Escef wrote:

I've seen people who have accumulated significantly higher post counts than I have in far less time. Most of the ones I've seen that have done this were rules gurus in the Magic: the Gathering section of the forums.

Yup.  I earned the first 2,000 or so in the MtG Rules Q&A and YMtC.  The last 3,000 or so have been here, in a group discussion, or in Previous Editions rule forums.

ZB, on the other hand...

Hey!  I've been better lately, dammit!  I'm participatin' in this 5e thing!  I just wrote two helpful posts in the last 10 minutes!  And lemme tell ya'all somethin': My paltry percentage of useful information is still enough to likely have me posting more useful info than most.  Cuz I friggin' rule.

Meh... all posts are helpful to someone. Whether it's a post clarifying mechanics, or just making a joke, someone is bound to be helped by it. 

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:48PM, homicidal_squirrel wrote:

Meh... all posts are helpful to someone. Whether it's a post clarifying mechanics, or just making a joke, someone is bound to be helped by it. 

well thats debateable by someone other than me

part of my post count has to do with my scribe badge of doing indexes and FAQs,and msot of it was done in the d20 mdoern area and then up in the SW RPG area...now since i have no brand from WotC to claim loaylity I tend to post here instead of going somewhere else to post stuff like news,politics,pointless rants attacking WotC for ruining my childhood memories of the past somehow and or runing the game(s) i love depsite still being bale to play the want with what i have...

Flamewars to, those garner post counts...remember how the edition you like most is so much better than the one that you didn't like most?

It totally wasn't, it was unfair. 

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:29PM, Escef wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:29PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:23PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

It really depends on the poster. Once you get a feel for a poster's style, you can guesstimate what percentage of that poster's posts are actually useful to the community content, and what percentage is goofing off or being a pointless jerkwad.

Exactly.
@ Easy e...
For example, it is clear that my percentage of contribution is around 98%, as anyone here can attest. Almost everything I say is for the use of edifying or educating the reader. My worth to the Community is priceless because I contribute heavily and without fail... just ask anybody. They'll tell you the same thing I'm sure.

Also, what gave you the idea that post count has anything at all to do with contribution or helping anyone? Also, who decides what is "contributing" or "helping"?

The Edition Wars really gave me a ton of posts. Mostly bad rp, but tons of updates and stuffz.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:52PM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:48PM, homicidal_squirrel wrote:

Meh... all posts are helpful to someone. Whether it's a post clarifying mechanics, or just making a joke, someone is bound to be helped by it. 

well thats debateable by someone other than me

I knew you would agree with me.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:52PM, trappedslider wrote:

part of my post count has to do with my scribe badge of doing indexes and FAQs,and msot of it was done in the d20 mdoern area and then up in the SW RPG area...now since i have no brand from WotC to claim loaylity I tend to post here instead of going somewhere else to post stuff like news,politics,pointless rants attacking WotC for ruining my childhood memories of the past somehow and or runing the game(s) i love depsite still being bale to play the want with what i have...

I'm pretty sure the majority of my posts were helpful in nature. If I had to guestimate, I'd say between 95%-99% of my post have been helpful.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 1:09PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

Hell, just yesterday I championed an unpopular cause and took all sorts of abuse (enough to get the thread closed).  Me and one other member.

Yeah.  I looked into that, by the way.  I was reminded why I stopped going 'round the general boards.  

Mar 1, 2012 -- 2:17PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Flamewars to, those garner post counts...remember how the edition you like most is so much better than the one that you didn't like most?

Oh tell me about it.  I can't stand this Quantum crap.  Back in my day we had Newtonian and we liked it.

I think most people know not to come to the Tavern for help haha. I mean i think it even says in the description, a place to kick back and hang out or something, nothing in there about helping people.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 9:06PM, EscherEnigma wrote:

   I can't stand this Quantum crap.  Back in my day we had Newtonian and we liked it.

Yeah but with  General Unified Field theory you could have both, right?

Have you ever actually tried running Quantum and Newtonian at the same time?  Ugh.  What a newb. You either have to strip the Newtonian down so much that it's not worth the trouble or the play at a level where the Quantum is a huge pile of work for no discernable benefit over Newtonian.  Waste of time.  The compatibility of the systems is only on paper, never in practice.

I mean seriously... just... gawd.  Some people. 

I hang my head in shame

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:29PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:23PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

Hey, it's been a while since I last saw a 1001 thread. What happened to those?

Mar 1, 2012 -- 11:27PM, ADHadh wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:29PM, Eazy_E wrote:

Mar 1, 2012 -- 12:23PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

What's that s'posed to mean, ace? 

Back when I first joined I'd see all these people post awesome things. RavingDorks 1001 Traps comes to mind, and they had decent post counts - and I wouldn't post when I had nothing to contribute.

Then after I returned to the boards and gazed directly at OTT I realized that a high post count didn't mean a poster has been helping anyone or anything at all. I was disappointed a little, even though I was foolish to think people on the internet were generally helpful.

Hey, it's been a while since I last saw a 1001 thread. What happened to those?

A lot less forum traffic. Last I saw were people doing 101 threads. Those didn't last either. Maybe 11 threads are the way to go.

Unlike my fellows I'll fess up.

I quit being a helpful member years ago when I realized that people are irreperably stupid, it's best to just kick back, and laugh at it all. Well people and wotc are anyway. For more recent proof just ask ZB how that thread he was in recently went. It very much proved that general discussion earned the nick name I gave it 3 years ago. Genital Discussion. Cause it has all the maturity and thoughtfulness in it, that shut in nerds have while discussing genitals.

 If I had to guess, I'd say somewhere around 3-4k of my posts were serious "help" posts. 

The rest you can pin on OTT one way or another.

Mar 1, 2012 -- 9:06PM, EscherEnigma wrote:

Yeah.  I looked into that, by the way.  I was reminded why I stopped going 'round the general boards.  

Yeah, it was bad.  I was getting sick.  So, I quit.  Some people, you just can't reach. 

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:32AM, Cpt_Micha wrote:

Unlike my fellows I'll fess up.

I quit being a helpful member years ago when I realized that people are irreperably stupid, it's best to just kick back, and laugh at it all. Well people and wotc are anyway. For more recent proof just ask ZB how that thread he was in recently went. It very much proved that general discussion earned the nick name I gave it 3 years ago. Genital Discussion. Cause it has all the maturity and thoughtfulness in it, that shut in nerds have while discussing genitals.
.

that also could be applied to some of the group dicussions.....

  There is no group. 

/laughs like a teen

Group sex.

/runs away laughing

Mar 2, 2012 -- 11:45AM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:32AM, Cpt_Micha wrote:

Unlike my fellows I'll fess up.

I quit being a helpful member years ago when I realized that people are irreperably stupid, it's best to just kick back, and laugh at it all. Well people and wotc are anyway. For more recent proof just ask ZB how that thread he was in recently went. It very much proved that general discussion earned the nick name I gave it 3 years ago. Genital Discussion. Cause it has all the maturity and thoughtfulness in it, that shut in nerds have while discussing genitals.
.

that also could be applied to some of the group dicussions.....

Frankly, I am sick of hearing you bitch about it.
Why don't you just leave it?

Mar 2, 2012 -- 1:00PM, Robin_Hoodlum wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 11:45AM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:32AM, Cpt_Micha wrote:

Unlike my fellows I'll fess up.

I quit being a helpful member years ago when I realized that people are irreperably stupid, it's best to just kick back, and laugh at it all. Well people and wotc are anyway. For more recent proof just ask ZB how that thread he was in recently went. It very much proved that general discussion earned the nick name I gave it 3 years ago. Genital Discussion. Cause it has all the maturity and thoughtfulness in it, that shut in nerds have while discussing genitals.
.

that also could be applied to some of the group dicussions.....

Frankly, I am sick of hearing you bitch about it.
Why don't you just leave it?

i could say the same to oyu about WotC's moderation.....oh wait i have numerous times....

Mar 2, 2012 -- 12:24PM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

  There is no group. 

fixed my statement to reflect the non existence?

Mar 2, 2012 -- 12:53PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

/laughs like a teen

Group sex.

/runs away laughing

*trips you and laughs running away*

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:16PM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 1:00PM, Robin_Hoodlum wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 11:45AM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:32AM, Cpt_Micha wrote:

Unlike my fellows I'll fess up.

I quit being a helpful member years ago when I realized that people are irreperably stupid, it's best to just kick back, and laugh at it all. Well people and wotc are anyway. For more recent proof just ask ZB how that thread he was in recently went. It very much proved that general discussion earned the nick name I gave it 3 years ago. Genital Discussion. Cause it has all the maturity and thoughtfulness in it, that shut in nerds have while discussing genitals.
.

that also could be applied to some of the group dicussions.....

Frankly, I am sick of hearing you bitch about it.
Why don't you just leave it?

i could say the same to oyu about WotC's moderation.....oh wait i have numerous times....

But the moderation is worthy to bitch about, the group is not.
The group is one of the best things that has happened around here for a long time, and I dare say it may have kept some people here for longer than they normally might have been. It is a private group, not a public one.
So if all you aree going to do about it is bitch and complain about it and the posters therein, why don't you just leave it?
No really.
Why not just leave?

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:18PM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 12:53PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

/laughs like a teen

Group sex.

/runs away laughing

*trips you and laughs running away*

*Pulls out .45.*
*no more running or laughing*

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:24PM, Robin_Hoodlum wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:16PM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 1:00PM, Robin_Hoodlum wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 11:45AM, trappedslider wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:32AM, Cpt_Micha wrote:

Unlike my fellows I'll fess up.

I quit being a helpful member years ago when I realized that people are irreperably stupid, it's best to just kick back, and laugh at it all. Well people and wotc are anyway. For more recent proof just ask ZB how that thread he was in recently went. It very much proved that general discussion earned the nick name I gave it 3 years ago. Genital Discussion. Cause it has all the maturity and thoughtfulness in it, that shut in nerds have while discussing genitals.
.

that also could be applied to some of the group dicussions.....

Frankly, I am sick of hearing you bitch about it.
Why don't you just leave it?

i could say the same to oyu about WotC's moderation.....oh wait i have numerous times....

But the moderation is worthy to bitch about, the group is not.
The group is one of the best things that has happened around here for a long time, and I dare say it may have kept some people here for longer than they normally might have been. It is a private group, not a public one.
So if all you aree going to do about it is bitch and complain about it and the posters therein, why don't you just leave it?
No really.
Why not just leave?

i merealy pointed out that some of the dicussions that go on in there are on the same level as as the dicussion that Micha was refering to unless you dissargee with that statement.....

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:31PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

Spoiler: Show

That's ok. I don't mind if her orgasms are fake so long as mine are real.

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:12PM, Escef wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:31PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

Spoiler: Show

That's ok. I don't mind if her orgasms are fake so long as mine are real.

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:12PM, Escef wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:31PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

Spoiler: Show

That's ok. I don't mind if her orgasms are fake so long as mine are real.

Are you one of the three wise douches?

    I'd say about three quarters of my post count is actually helpful posting in the Rules Q & A or CharDev forums - I've been posting regularly in the What Do You Think My Character Looks Like? thread in CharDev for three years now, for example, and the rest (snark, one-liners and flogging my amazing photoshop skills, i.e., the pic above) is solely meant to be entertaining (at least to myself)...
 If I bothered to get involved in any of the discussions here or in the group, I'd probably have at least twice the post count I do now.

Mar 2, 2012 -- 5:12PM, Escef wrote:

Mar 2, 2012 -- 2:31PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

Spoiler: Show

That's ok. I don't mind if her orgasms are fake so long as mine are real.

After giving myself a hard and honest evaluation, I would have to say that roughly 110% of my posts have been helpful (+/- 10%).

Mar 3, 2012 -- 4:35PM, bone_naga wrote:

After giving myself a hard and honest evaluation, I would have to say that roughly 110% of my posts have been helpful (+/- 10%).

Don't shortchange yourself bone.
I fully believe 120% of your posts have been helpful.

110% and 120% are imposible, like 0.999999 = 1.

Mar 3, 2012 -- 9:49PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

110% and 120% are imposible, like 0.999999 = 1.

Exactly.
Because exactly .01% of your posts have been helpful.

Also, my dog has done an excellent job of typing since i am, indxdeed, too drunk.
Also, we have a n agrreement .
I shan't kick him cuz of you guys, and he won't eat my new pup/
Fair enough i says.

Mar 3, 2012 -- 10:14PM, Robin_Hoodlum wrote:

Mar 3, 2012 -- 9:49PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

110% and 120% are imposible, like 0.999999 = 1.

Exactly.
Because exactly .01% of your posts have been helpful.

Also, my dog has done an excellent job of typing since i am, indxdeed, too drunk.
Also, we have a n agrreement .
I shan't kick him cuz of you guys, and he won't eat my new pup/
Fair enough i says.

Your drunk posts are always so much fun.

Mar 3, 2012 -- 8:31PM, Robin_Hoodlum wrote:

Mar 3, 2012 -- 4:35PM, bone_naga wrote:

After giving myself a hard and honest evaluation, I would have to say that roughly 110% of my posts have been helpful (+/- 10%).

Don't shortchange yourself bone.
I fully believe 120% of your posts have been helpful.

Well I like to err on the side of caution/humility, but my 10% margin of error does allow for a value of 120%.

Speaking of meat, I went to this Brazilian style place on Sat.  We had like 18 people there.  They serve 14 kinds of meat.  I had like 11 of 'em and seconds of a few.  Oh, and I ate 4 chicken hearts -which are pretty damned good, actually.  So yeah, meat.  And a $1200 bill.

Mar 5, 2012 -- 7:47AM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

Speaking of meat, I went to this Brazilian style place on Sat.  We had like 18 people there.  They serve 14 kinds of meat.  I had like 11 of 'em and seconds of a few.  Oh, and I ate 4 chicken hearts -which are pretty damned good, actually.  So yeah, meat.  And a $1200 bill.

Was it a Texas De Brazil? I know they have locations in Ohio. They seem to be spreading out. We've had one down here for quite some time. They have pretty good stuff. 

It was actually Brasa.  And it was really, really good.  It's only $40 a dinner, too.  Drinks, sushi and dessert extra.  Totally worth the price - if you don't load up on buffet items and the early served meats. 

Aside from the sushi, it looks like a Texas De Brazil. I think the price is bout the same. Do they walk around with the different meat skewers at Brasa? The good thing about Texas De Brazil is that you can request what meat you want. 

Yeah, they bring 14 different kinds of meat over on skewers (though you have to request the chicken hearts).  You don't get to ask them what to bring but you also do.  Like, they will bring you all 13 no matter what.  After that - or even during - you can ask that they bring some back.  We had them come back with bacon wrapped filet and parmesan crusted filet, too. 

It starts off with the buffet.  You go up and choose stuff to eat that they have that day.  I made a salad with palm hearts and mini corn.  They had mussels and salmon an' other stuff like that, too.  Oh, and cheeses.  Once you're done with that, they take your plate and then bring out new plates and the first rounds of meat.  In between, they also bring out fries and fried bananas (which you can dip in chocolate if you ask for it) but it's mostly about the meat.  Once you're ready, you can order dessert.  It was pretty neat, actually, and totally worth the money.  We may go back there for my birthday (with less people ).

They do pretty much the same exact thing as Texas De Brazil. Those types of places are good for especial occassions. They typically have awesome food. I'm partial to the beef steak ribs they serve. Freaking amazing.

I tried a little rib but I'm not a fan.  I did like their flank steak, though.  I'm kind of a elitist as far as beef cuts go so I was pretty surprised I liked it as much as I did.  It had a ton of flavor and the texture was pretty good.  They just know how to cook meat there, I guess.  But yeah, those places are cool.  Pretty different but not a gimmick.  The food is actually worth the money.

Yeah, there are a couple of Brazilian steak houses down hre that are superb. There are also some Argentinian steak houses. Seriously, the amount of choice we have down here for food is out of hand. Some are more expensive than others, but dude... so worth it... like totally.

There's a similar one in Long Beach, CA that I've been to once called Greenfield's. 

Sounds a bit pricey, but 14 kinds of meat sounds like heaven to me.

That's the thing, it's not really that pricey if you think about it.  Like, if I go to Roadhouse and get a filet (and it's decent, too - definitely worth the money) it'll cost me like $25 or so with a drink.  Not a beer, either.  Of course it comes with a salad, bread and potatoes.  Brasa was $40 and I had a salad.  Could have had fries or even salmon or a pork dish that I chose not to (wanted more room for the good stuff).  Anyhoo, I ate more than two filet's worth of filet and I had sirloin, pork loin, flank steak, ham and chicken hearts on top of it.  So, if you prep right and stick to the better meats, it really isn't all that bad price wise.  Oh, and don't drink a lot.  Drinks ain' cheap.  Beer isn't bad but my mojito was $9.  It was a killer mojito, though. 

Mar 6, 2012 -- 8:39AM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

I go to Roadhouse

Is it the Double Deuce?

Mar 6, 2012 -- 12:09PM, draco1119 wrote:

Mar 6, 2012 -- 8:39AM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

I go to Roadhouse

Is it the Double Deuce?

I used to **** guys like you in prison!

Are we still talking about otters what happend don't want to go though all the pages So i'm saying Micha Zombie babies and draco there are all really cool!

You want to eat them?

Mar 24, 2012 -- 9:20PM, Resurrection_Man wrote:

You want to eat them?

No if I wanted to eat them I would of said they where tasty!

How would you know if you haven't tried them?

Mar 24, 2012 -- 10:05PM, jetshield wrote:

How would you know if you haven't tried them?

Cuz I just do.

I thought we went from meet to meat.  I ... I don't wanna be meated.

Mar 26, 2012 -- 8:07AM, Zombie_Babies wrote:

I thought we went from meet to meat.  I ... I don't wanna be meated.

Yes you do. Show