Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Edition wars a d the future
1 year ago  ::  Feb 12, 2012 - 3:29PM #1
e_whit
Date Joined: Oct 20, 2009
Posts: 172
1. People are people and there are all types. Constructive positive negative rude and so on

2. There are those that will never change their opinion on what is considered the true d&d Ed 

3. What we should all agree on is our love of the game And wanting to see it thrive

4.  All editions had pro and con to it.  That is why new editions were made. What happened is the rules got bigger in fact everything got bigger which led to more pro and con issueS and so the cycle continued. What failed was not trying to do what they are trying to do now. Mass player opinion on what worked and what did not.  If it was done, we might be at 2nd or 3rd edition instead of 5th

5.What I think needs to be done and not to be done. 
I am afraid that we will see a huge book with each chapter listing each edition as an option to choose. Thus a melting pot of rules e.g hit table choose table a b or c   Saves choose table a b or c etc. Although great for getting everything out there for people to choose from I see mass confusion in works on howI having it all work together. 
What I am hopeful for is basic rules and adding a chapter of additions that can be chosen by the gaming group. 
For me a simple physical attack method ac 20. Roll a d20 add bonuses equal or greater is a hit
Saves: based on 4th edition work and are simple. However I would limit the level bonus for every 5 levels 
Slide pulls push should only be an option to choose if wanted to be used by a group who might be using figures. It would be better like this. E.g declare a pull or push vrs target. modifier for your attack roll equal to size of creature for a 1hex pull or push. -1 small -2med -3Etc 
Othwise just keep it simPle with no rule and allow creativity for DM and players.
Movement in fourth is simple and can be used for both hex figures or no figure game play
Encumbrances for movement don't have any. Let the DM decide. 
Get rid of marks. Altogether. 
Allow fighters to wear any armor
Alignment in fourth was perfect and simple
Gods in fourth is a good sample but change the following bahumet is dragonborn god like Moradin and corellon for elves. Change raven queen to a better name. Get rid of Vecna as a god and back as a villain lich. Add a simple way for DM to create their own gods to add. Name symbol influence alignment brief summary 
Skills: either simple like fourth or none. Just tell the DM what you want to do and he gives you a modifier. I jump over the pit. Ok roll your dex -3. 
Weapons simple one die for damage. No change for creature size 
Need to change the powers. Leave it as feats or none at all or redo how powers are done. 






 
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 12, 2012 - 6:17PM #2
Emerikol
Date Joined: Apr 23, 2009
Posts: 4,534
It was only until 4e that financially WOTC took a hit.  So if we have the same success as we had going from 1e-->2e-->3e then WTOC will be very happy.   If 3e-->4e then they will not be.  I'm talking finances nothing else.

You can't please everybody but maybe you can get a ruleset that pleases more than 4e does.

I'm hoping one that can also please the 4e people as well. 
Here is a great blog by themormegil that explains why we had an edition war.
narrativism vs simulationism
A great blog on the business side of 4e and its impact on WOTC
4e is new coke
What core means and does not mean
HoBby Award Winner
metagame dissonance (plot coupon)    
dissociative mechanics (same as my own metagame dissonance. A great article.)
The Five Minute Workday Fallacy
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 12, 2012 - 6:42PM #3
bone_naga
Date Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 9,961

Feb 12, 2012 -- 6:17PM, Emerikol wrote:

It was only until 4e that financially WOTC took a hit.  So if we have the same success as we had going from 1e-->2e-->3e then WTOC will be very happy.   If 3e-->4e then they will not be.  I'm talking finances nothing else.



I don't think that statement is true. First of all, keep in mind that TSR went bankrupt during 2e. Second, it isn't a matter of relative revenue, it's raw numbers. Hasbro doesn't give a **** if 4e made more or less than 1e/2e/3e and they don't give a **** if 5e makes more or less than 1e/2e/3e/4e. What they care about is whether or not the D&D brand name hits their arbitrary dollar figure (which I don't believe 3e ever hit either, so they would not be happy even if 4e was the same success that 3e was, and if they owned Paizo we'd be seeing a new edition of Pathfinder instead).

Owner and Proprietor of the House of Trolls.
God of ownership and possession.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 12, 2012 - 6:52PM #4
Kishri
Date Joined: Oct 28, 2008
Posts: 599

Feb 12, 2012 -- 6:42PM, bone_naga wrote:

Feb 12, 2012 -- 6:17PM, Emerikol wrote:

It was only until 4e that financially WOTC took a hit.  So if we have the same success as we had going from 1e-->2e-->3e then WTOC will be very happy.   If 3e-->4e then they will not be.  I'm talking finances nothing else.



I don't think that statement is true. First of all, keep in mind that TSR went bankrupt during 2e. Second, it isn't a matter of relative revenue, it's raw numbers. Hasbro doesn't give a **** if 4e made more or less than 1e/2e/3e and they don't give a **** if 5e makes more or less than 1e/2e/3e/4e. What they care about is whether or not the D&D brand name hits their arbitrary dollar figure (which I don't believe 3e ever hit either, so they would not be happy even if 4e was the same success that 3e was, and if they owned Paizo we'd be seeing a new edition of Pathfinder instead).




TSR went bankrupt not because of the sales of 2e, which, admittedly, were flagging, but because they over leveraged themselves trying to be a paperback novel publishing company.

Your second statement of what Hasbro cares about is pretty much spot on Imho.  And I agree with you that even the pinnacle of 3e sales is not enough to impress the shareholders, for they are spoiled by the $50 million+ per year sales of giant franchises like Transformers.  If D&d is to ever gain Transformers like sales, it needs an IP that has Transformers mass appeal to go with the game.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 12, 2012 - 8:21PM #5
bone_naga
Date Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 9,961

Feb 12, 2012 -- 6:52PM, Kishri wrote:

Your second statement of what Hasbro cares about is pretty much spot on Imho.  And I agree with you that even the pinnacle of 3e sales is not enough to impress the shareholders, for they are spoiled by the $50 million+ per year sales of giant franchises like Transformers.  If D&d is to ever gain Transformers like sales, it needs an IP that has Transformers mass appeal to go with the game.



Yep. Unfortunately it doesn't help that every attempt at a D&D movie has been even a worse disaster than the Transformers or GI Joe movies. We have no action figure line to leverage. There are video games that are ok, but nothing to compare with the big moneymakers like WoW.

I just don't see Hasbro being satisfied even if D&D captures 99% of the RPG market.

Owner and Proprietor of the House of Trolls.
God of ownership and possession.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 13, 2012 - 9:14AM #6
Lugnut171
Date Joined: May 9, 2011
Posts: 505

Feb 12, 2012 -- 8:21PM, bone_naga wrote:

Feb 12, 2012 -- 6:52PM, Kishri wrote:

Your second statement of what Hasbro cares about is pretty much spot on Imho.  And I agree with you that even the pinnacle of 3e sales is not enough to impress the shareholders, for they are spoiled by the $50 million+ per year sales of giant franchises like Transformers.  If D&d is to ever gain Transformers like sales, it needs an IP that has Transformers mass appeal to go with the game.



Yep. Unfortunately it doesn't help that every attempt at a D&D movie has been even a worse disaster than the Transformers or GI Joe movies. We have no action figure line to leverage. There are video games that are ok, but nothing to compare with the big moneymakers like WoW.

I just don't see Hasbro being satisfied even if D&D captures 99% of the RPG market.





I would agree I wouldn't be suprised if the whole American RPG market (every single RPG from Vampire to Call and beyond) isn't much more then 50 million dollars altogether.  

Also well movies like Transformers are bad, they have so many advantages come out during big summer months, and have flashy special effects, which  D&D will never get.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 13, 2012 - 11:05AM #7
e_whit
Date Joined: Oct 20, 2009
Posts: 172
True but what are the best ideas to make 5th work taki g the best of each edition
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 13, 2012 - 11:18AM #8
Agathokles
Date Joined: Mar 21, 2001
Posts: 1,486
More precisely, there were good video games, but there hasn't been a really good one since Neverwinter Nights 2, and that was 3e era.
Unfortunately, as far as video games are involved Hasbro is shackled to Atari until 2016 or so, and Atari doesn't seem able to produce games on par with Skyrim or Dragon Age (or even NWN 2 itself).

GP
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 14, 2012 - 2:54PM #9
Ogiwan
Date Joined: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 3,120
I thought I heard something about WotC getting the video game rights back from Atari, since they were sucking......

But, your core point is right. When Atari got involved, D&D games went downhill. I did not like NWN1 at all (I wanted a full party, not me and a henchman!), and NWN2 was just....bland. Of course, NWN2 was made by Obsidian, who just kinda suck. Temple of Elemental Evil had great promise, but it was ruined by a slew of bugs.

You know what I'm playing to get my video D&D fix? Baldur's Gate. The first one. That's how crappy a job WotC and Atari have done with their video games. 
Gold is for the mistress, silver for the maid
Copper for the craftsman, cunning at his trade."
"Good!" said the Baron, sitting in his hall,
"But Iron -- Cold Iron -- is master of them all."
-Kipling

Defenders: We ARE the wall!

I've replaced the previous Edition Warring line in my sig with this one, because honestly, everybody needs to work together to make the D&D they like without trampling on somebody else's D&D.

Miss d20 Modern? Take a look at Dias Ex Machina Game's UltraModern 4e!

Aug 16, 2012 -- 1:44AM, Undrhil wrote:

I am a hero, not a chump.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 15, 2012 - 5:59AM #10
Leekanh
Date Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Posts: 287

Feb 14, 2012 -- 2:54PM, Ogiwan wrote:

I thought I heard something about WotC getting the video game rights back from Atari, since they were sucking......

But, your core point is right. When Atari got involved, D&D games went downhill. I did not like NWN1 at all (I wanted a full party, not me and a henchman!), and NWN2 was just....bland. Of course, NWN2 was made by Obsidian, who just kinda suck. Temple of Elemental Evil had great promise, but it was ruined by a slew of bugs.

You know what I'm playing to get my video D&D fix? Baldur's Gate. The first one. That's how crappy a job WotC and Atari have done with their video games. 




Obsidian is... Strange... They can dish out pretty cool games or really bland games. New Vegas and Mask of the Betrayer were really good, even better than the standard Bioware game IMHO. But then you have the bland and meh titles like the base NWN 2 (wich was more of a parody of an rpg than an rpg...). Oh well...

But yeah, a good 4e videogame could have really helped the edition, sadly Atari sat on the license. Let's hope for a decent 5e game (in Eberron!), at least!

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing