Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 12:50AM #1
bmcfadden
Date Joined: Apr 2, 2010
Posts: 16
So I was thinking that magic should be something that can be manipulated at will, as opposed to something like Vancian magic or spell abilities. Why shouldn't magic work like Prestidigitation except on a grander scale?

I began thinking of magic as more of a skill check against a DC determined by the DM for whether or not the effect goes off, and the caster can basically try to do whatever the heck they want to. The catch would be that magic is volitile stuff, and when you try to manipulate magic, it hurts you. So if you try something relatively simply, it might only deal a point of damage to you. But if you want to throw a massive fireball at a group of enemies, that'll cost you even more. 
So let's say, for example, you're a caster and you're out in the woods and a wolf attacks you. You notice the wolf is standing near some tree roots and say to the DM, "Hey, I want to use magic to make those roots entangle the wolf and immobilize him." The DM says, "Sure, go for it." You make your roll against a DC (possibly the wolf's AC as a baseline) set by the DM and succeed. The spell goes off and the DM states that this drained 1 HP from you. 

Do you think this could work as a balanced idea, so long as it carried the caveat that magic is a more subtle art of manipulation of the elements and environment around you as opposed to god-like spells that rain doom upon your foes?
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 7:10AM #2
Reg06
Date Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Posts: 3,850
Magic systems like this usually have the game system built around them, because it is ridiculously hard to balance. 
 
One-half of the tabletop gaming news podcast Going Last
Co-author on AoA 2-3 and 4-1.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 9:58AM #3
bmcfadden
Date Joined: Apr 2, 2010
Posts: 16
Do you know of any specific game systems that use a magic system like that? I've seen some systems that come close, but they're still rather restrictive and use other mechanics.

I'd figure that the DM should know best as to what he or she is going to allow a caster to do in the game. The DM could always say no, that's beyond the scope of your powers, or just set an absurd DC and when the caster fails miserably and has half their life sucked away for trying, they'd learn to keep things simple. 
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 10:04AM #4
WolfLordBran
Date Joined: Jul 26, 2009
Posts: 1,314

Feb 5, 2012 -- 9:58AM, bmcfadden wrote:

Do you know of any specific game systems that use a magic system like that? I've seen some systems that come close, but they're still rather restrictive and use other mechanics.

I'd figure that the DM should know best as to what he or she is going to allow a caster to do in the game. The DM could always say no, that's beyond the scope of your powers, or just set an absurd DC and when the caster fails miserably and has half their life sucked away for trying, they'd learn to keep things simple. 




White Wolf's various Mage games are along this idea. Spend enough resources, wrack your brain for something, and pray you roll well enough (NWoD) or have enough stuff to lower the DC (OWoD).

The problem I've seen with this though is you get a Mage trying to cast some sort of weird Faraday(spelling?) Cage or completely rendering a creature/encounter useless by doing something with their magic. Which then runs into the problem of the Fighter, Paladin, and Rogue looking at the Mage in question and saying "We'll be at the Tavern, give us a Sending when you're done here."

Spiteful Wizard and Voice of Reason of the House of Trolls

The Silent God of the House of Trolls
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 10:27AM #5
bmcfadden
Date Joined: Apr 2, 2010
Posts: 16

Feb 5, 2012 -- 10:04AM, WolfLordBran wrote:

The problem I've seen with this though is you get a Mage trying to cast some sort of weird Faraday(spelling?) Cage or completely rendering a creature/encounter useless by doing something with their magic. Which then runs into the problem of the Fighter, Paladin, and Rogue looking at the Mage in question and saying "We'll be at the Tavern, give us a Sending when you're done here."




This is one of the concerns my gaming group brought up with this. One person said, "Well, I'll just surround the monster in a magic wall, then I'll fill it with water and drown them," or some such nonsense.

I was a little puzzled by this. First he assumed that the cage would last forever once it was cast. I explained that it would last until the start of his next turn, and if he wanted to, he could continue trying to keep the magic going with the same roll (and damage he took) to create it. And the more powerful the creature he's trying to contain, the higher the DC would be as well as his loss of life to keep it going. That's nothing to say of the water and combat lasting only 6 seconds per round. He'd kill himself trying to maintain the wall long enough.

But again, the magic being used wouldn't be so drastic. If I were to write something up, it'd explain that magic is far more subtle and just manipulative of the environment around you. Is the monster standing next to a lit brazier? You could have the fire errupt out of it and damage the monster. Is the monster standing in hindering terrain made of roots and brambles? You could have the roots tighten around its feet and immobilize them until the start of your next turn.

So what I'm looking for is something that is open ended and dependant more upon creativity and roleplaying as opposed to creating Genie of the Lamp-style casters with semi-phenomenal, nearly cosmic powers.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 11:03AM #6
Reg06
Date Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Posts: 3,850
I don't think you'll get that with D&D. The system is too codified, structured, and well balanced to function in the way you're looking for.

One-half of the tabletop gaming news podcast Going Last
Co-author on AoA 2-3 and 4-1.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 1:33PM #7
rampant
Date Joined: Oct 26, 2004
Posts: 7,985
One thing to watch out for with free form casters is teleporting/levitating rocks into people's lungs.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 06, 2012 - 4:59AM #8
Namagem
Date Joined: Dec 19, 2008
Posts: 137
You should always, with open ended systems, have baselines like line of sight and line of effect. One thing you might want to do is make a system where wizards can, at each level where they would get a power, have a skill challenge where they create the power they would get, reigned in by skills and your DM ability.

Like, if the player says that they want their 5th level daily to be an area burst 5 stun save ends, set an appropriate DC for it (Let's say, 50), and allow them a roll. If they get under that, say they aren't powerful enough, and make that aspect of the power appropriately powerful (like area burst 3 immobilized save ends)

If you're going to make a power like this, the questions you should ask should be something like this:

What damage type would you like your power to be? (arcana)

What range and/or size do you want it to be?

How much damage do you want it to do?

What effects do you want it to have?



And after you have the results of the questions and the rolls (and the level the player is, for reference), build him the power closest to what he wants that's appropriately powerful for the level.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 06, 2012 - 7:31AM #9
chaosfang
Date Joined: May 1, 2009
Posts: 4,878

Feb 5, 2012 -- 11:03AM, Reg06 wrote:

I don't think you'll get that with D&D. The system is too codified, structured, and well balanced to function in the way you're looking for.



Actually, D&D does allow it to some degree (well, at least with 4E, if you allow Arcana or an ability check associated with your class' primary ability modifier [like INT for wizards, CHA for sorcerers).

However, this is best played as a series of checks, depending on the level of the task.  Let's take the "make a cage, drown enemy in water" scenario.

1. He casts the spell.
2. At the start of his next turn, he must make an Arcana check as a minor action (Hard DC) to sustain the effect of the spell.
3. He casts the fill-the-cage-with-water spell as a standard action.
4. Follow the rules on drowning (DMG p.159, or RC p.180).

The rules effectively state that the creature he's attempting to drown would have three minutes before suffocation.  That means that before the target creature actually drowns, he needs to sustain the Cage spell for 30 rounds before the target creature starts making Endurance checks, DC = 20 + 5 for each succeeding round, and failing the Endurance check results in first a loss of healing surges, then damage equal to the creature's level.

Let's assume we adjust the per-round from 6 seconds to 1 minute (pre-3E setting).  That's still 3 rounds before suffocation.  And even if the target's Endurance is so low, because a monster has 1 healing surge/tier -- something people often forget -- that's at least 4 rounds before the target takes damage.  Assuming the creature is a level 1 artillery with 4 CON, that's still a total of 14 rounds before it dies.  34 rounds if we use official rules instead.

That's a lot of effort for very little mechanical benefit, really... but whatever floats his boat *shrugs* 

Spoiler: Show

You are Red/Blue!
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

You are both rational and emotional. You value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what you create. At best, you're innovative and intuitive. At worst, you're scattered and unpredictable.

D&D Home Page - What Monster Are You? - D&D Compendium


Oct 3, 2009 -- 12:36AM, MrCelsius wrote:


If you're crossing the street and see a city bus barreling straight toward you with 'GIVE ME YOUR WALLET!' painted across its windshield, you probably won't be reaching for your wallet.



I Don't Always Play Strikers...But When I Do, I Prefer Vampire
Stay Thirsty, My Friends


This is what I believe is the spirit of D&D 4E, and my deal breaker for D&D Next: equal opportunities, with distinct specializations, in areas where conflict happens the most often, without having to worry about heavy micromanagement or system mastery.

What I hope to be my most useful contributions to the D&D Community: DM Idea: Collaborative Mapping, Classless 4E (homebrew system, that hopefully helps in D&D Next development), Gamma World 7E random character generator (by yours truly), and the Concept of Perfect Imbalance (for D&D Next and other TRPGs in development)

Pre-3E D&D should be recognized for what they were: simulation wargames where people could tell stories with

The Best Answer to "Why 4E?"

Fun vs. Engaging
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 06, 2012 - 8:07AM #10
Reg06
Date Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Posts: 3,850
Unless the drowning enemy takes damage while it is drowning, in which case its life span is measured in rounds not minutes).
One-half of the tabletop gaming news podcast Going Last
Co-author on AoA 2-3 and 4-1.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing