|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 9:14AM
#11
|
|
|
You're not reading it closely enough, it doesn't work that way. The vulnerability is only to your attacks, it doesn't help your allies. (Still a major benefit to multiattackers, but they didn't exactly need the help.)
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 9:30AM
#12
|
|
|
You're not reading it closely enough, it doesn't work that way. The vulnerability is only to your attacks, it doesn't help your allies. (Still a major benefit to multiattackers, but they didn't exactly need the help.)
Pah! Alright... still, good for yourself then. I thought this was a more leaderly ability. Sorcerers should like it, then, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 9:32AM
#13
|
|
|
Sorcerers won't care too much as, again, it's only vs. your attacks, and most of their multiple damage instances aren't from multiple attacks.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 10:48AM
#14
|
|
|
Also, I'm upset one of the themes didn't give pixies a badass squirrel mount as pictured on the first page. What a tease.
What is there that lets you ride a creature of your size?
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 10:59AM
#15
|
|
|
Maybe the squirrels are Small?
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 11:56AM
#16
|
Date Joined:
Mar 23, 2009
|
Overall I was throughly underwhelmed at these new themes, espescially the feywarden. The Dragoon could see use by Cavaliers, and their level 10 Summon looks pretty decent.
Still, couldn't Wizards have given us something better on Thanksgiving? (for those of us in the US)
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 2:48PM
#17
|
Date Joined:
Jan 17, 2009
|
Designer here. I'll take the heat for the article. You can lay it at my feet, but my intent was first to write for the Forgotten Realms, and background of the Moonshae Isles. When I design broad game-system articles, you can expect it won't be as restrictive. In the Realms, however, I could not in good conscious have made it a free-for-all. It's a rough balance between story and progressive tactical options. In the Realms, I always lean towards the first.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 5:23PM
#18
|
|
|
I'm disappointed that we get another mount-oriented theme with no free mount 
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 5:46PM
#19
|
Date Joined:
Apr 27, 2010
|
I'm disappointed that we get another mount-oriented theme with no free mount
This. Even if it's as simple as a Warhorse or something. Mounts aren't gamebreaking, since anyone can get one (either by class means, or purchasing one, should they feel the need to spend the gp)
RIP George! 4-21-11
RIP Abie! 1-2-13 Funny Forum Quotes
Show
 "You notice a large piece of mold clinging to your toothbrush. What do you do?"
 "I cast Fireball."
 "I run like hell!
The standard d4 is somewhat (SOMEWHAT) rounded on the top, the older models are even flat. The Lego is shaped in such a way that in an emergency, you can use one as a makeshift surgical knife.
My wife asked me if her pants made her look fat. What do you think I said?
Wife: Do these pants make me look fat?
RedSiegfried: I just killed a bunch of orc women and children.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Nov 24, 2011 - 8:19PM
#20
|
Date Joined:
Aug 31, 2009
|
While I want to agree, the logic here is a bit off.
If mounts are so easy to get, why do you need your theme to give you one? Just buy it.
Untying mounts from themes lets them work with any mount, so you're not stuck with that Warhorse your entire career. I think in the end, this is the best way to go. Unless of course the theme gave some awesome mount that was way better than any existing ones, which is I think a little closer to what you folks really want.
|
|
|
