|
1 year ago ::
Dec 19, 2011 - 11:53PM
#121
|
|
|
Please, care to explain why it is so blatantly important that if we don't have female satyrs this simple decision might ruin an entire D&D experience for someone?
Okay, you're being ridiculous. I mean, do you know where you are? This is a forum on the internet. Complaining is basically what it's for. It doesn't matter how "unimportant" a flaw happens to be. If it's still perceived to be a flaw, then it's still going to get called out and discussed as such. I could conversely ask you to explain why it's so blatantly important that if we do have female satyrs this simple decision might ruin an entire D&D experience for someone? If you don't want to discuss it, then get out of this thread.
There are so many flaws in the 4.0 system in regards to originality, like playing a Warforged that doesn't feel like one at all, instead this whole thread discusses about female satyrs!?
If you think that the way that Warforged were designed is a problem, then start a thread about that. That's how forums like this work.
I like how you called Virgllius out several posts after he posted that he understood why people are irked about the Satyr no-girls-allowed rule.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Dec 21, 2011 - 12:56AM
#122
|
Date Joined:
Aug 28, 2005
|
I like how you called Virgllius out several posts after he posted that he understood why people are irked about the Satyr no-girls-allowed rule.
Clearly, I had more to say.
Why, yes, as a matter of fact I am the Unfailing Arbiter of All That Is Good Design (Even More So Than The Actual Developers) TMSpeaking of things that were badly designed, please check out this thread for my Minotaur fix. What have the critics said, you ask? "If any of my players ask to play a Minotaur, I'm definitely offering this as an alternative to the official version." - EmpactWB "If I ever feel like playing a Minotaur I'll know where to look!" - Undrave "WoTC if you are reading this - please take this guy's advice." - Ferol_Debtor_of_Torm "Really full of win. A minotaur that is actually attractive for more than just melee classes." - Cpt_Micha Also, check out my recent GENASI variant! If you've ever wished that your Fire Genasi could actually set stuff on fire, your Water Genasi could actually swim, or your Wind Genasi could at least glide, then look no further. Finally, check out my OPTIONS FOR EVERYONE article, an effort to give unique support to the races that WotC keeps forgetting about. Includes new racial feature options for the Changeling, Deva, Githzerai, Gnoll, Gnome, Goliath, Half-Orc, Kalashtar, Minotaur, Shadar-Kai, Thri-Kreen, Warforged and more!
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Dec 21, 2011 - 1:04AM
#123
|
Date Joined:
May 13, 2009
|
IDK, i think a list of resistences would have been cooler than whatever their racial power is.
They do have a list  They're immune to breathing, eating, drinking and sleeping. It doesn't have a combat effect (because that could potentially be really powerful) except for being able to fight underwater without drowning, but they are pretty good resistances. They're also practically immune to failing death saves. Their current power gives them extra HP and temp HP, which makes them incredibly durable, which sounds like another good construct trait to me.
Epic Dungeon Master Want to give your players a kingdom of their own? I made a 4e rule system to make it happen! Your Kingdom awaits!Update 5th Sep 2011: Added a sample kingdom, as well as sample of play.
|
|
|
