|
2 years ago ::
Jul 08, 2011 - 11:46AM
#31
|
Date Joined:
May 27, 2010
|
I have to agree with DMattachine here. Changing societal norms for its own sake in a new setting is rather silly and comes of as forced. In a roleplaying game, you could even argue that it is detrimental, as it may destroy immersion for some.
Moderated by
ORC_Tao
on Jul 09, 2011 - 03:40PM
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 09, 2011 - 5:51AM
#32
|
Date Joined:
Nov 30, 2005
|
I've actually read it twice. I skipped the classes section the second time.I never said challenge norms for the sake of challenging norms. Just that it comes off weird to be like... "Also in this setting whit-ie is in charge." If you are going to bring that sort of thing up, you ought to use it as your chance to flip things around. Again IF you include it at all. I personally wouldn't and usually don't. Its clear you only skimmed my posts without examining them extensively. As for arguing that its detrimental, well you can argue whatever you want.
5e comments and thoughts all in one place. Check it out to provide feedback, mock, or steal ideas.
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28835423/Krusks_5e_Design_Goals?sdb=1
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 09, 2011 - 9:45AM
#33
|
Date Joined:
May 27, 2010
|
I've actually read it twice. I skipped the classes section the second time.I never said challenge norms for the sake of challenging norms. Just that it comes off weird to be like... "Also in this setting whit-ie is in charge."
If you are going to bring that sort of thing up, you ought to use it as your chance to flip things around. Again IF you include it at all. I personally wouldn't and usually don't.
I never said challenge norms for the sake of challenging norms.
you ought to use it as your chance to flip things around.
Do you see the problem?
And honestly, your whining about the fact that he passingly mentioned that a SINGLE royal family, who as he mentioned weren't very admirable to begin with, are pale-skinned comes of as awfully childish to me.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 09, 2011 - 12:38PM
#34
|
Date Joined:
Jun 23, 2011
|
By the way, I removed the skin color, but kept the distinctive eyes and hair. I could see someone thinking I was "anti-white".
As for the Gith, you missed the point. They are an element to the campaign. I could just as easily have made them a mysterious race with few details, but chose the Gith to give a connection to existing D&D canon.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Dec 03, 2012 - 5:05AM
#35
|
|
|
It's possible that anyone upload again the pdf???? I want download it, but I can't fine nowhere  thanks 
|
|
|
