Community

can a person like knight and slayer and weaponmaster? because i like all 3 for different reasons

Jul 15, 2011 -- 9:59AM, Thunder_Dragonbane wrote:

Jul 15, 2011 -- 9:05AM, Sir_Blackheart666 wrote:

can a person like knight and slayer and weaponmaster? because i like all 3 for different reasons

Odd that's not what you have been saying for this last month.

i like weaponmaster becasue it has all things its picks from but if i had to pick which one to make...i would make a knight or slayer then weaponmaster

i think what i am getting tired of in 4th edition in the groups i play in is that we just say the name of the power and say what it does...i think that is why i like knight and slayer....all i have to say is "i attack" and everyone knows that i am swing a sword an i missed that feeling with my fighters (al i played in 3rd and 3.5 was fighters, found wizards weak....well they were in our games anyway)

Jul 15, 2011 -- 12:17PM, Samrin wrote:

Jul 15, 2011 -- 10:14AM, Sir_Blackheart666 wrote:

Jul 15, 2011 -- 9:59AM, Thunder_Dragonbane wrote:

Jul 15, 2011 -- 9:05AM, Sir_Blackheart666 wrote:

can a person like knight and slayer and weaponmaster? because i like all 3 for different reasons

Odd that's not what you have been saying for this last month.

i like weaponmaster becasue it has all things its picks from but if i had to pick which one to make...i would make a knight or slayer then weaponmaster

i think what i am getting tired of in 4th edition in the groups i play in is that we just say the name of the power and say what it does...i think that is why i like knight and slayer....all i have to say is "i attack" and everyone knows that i am swing a sword an i missed that feeling with my fighters (al i played in 3rd and 3.5 was fighters, found wizards weak....well they were in our games anyway)

Wizards were the most powerful class in 3.5 :P Behind CoDzilla. How is stating your power any different than stating "I attack", anyway?

It's the riders and virtually thousands of choices available to the phb1 fighter that I like. I don't like being railroaded in character creation, which is why I avoid e-martial classes and the Vampire like the plague.

i love knight and slayer...to me when reading them i see them in battle and how they would act...or how i would get them to act...with weaponmaster i really cant think of how they going to be...i dont know why but that is how it is for me and with any class i am going to play i am going to railroad myself becasue i am going to pick with what is going to be what he would pick...knight and slayer does teh same but wha they are going to be is just more fixed in....like the weaponmaster i was making....i was lvling him up and anything that had to do witha  shield....that was the power i was picking...

Jul 15, 2011 -- 1:13PM, Thunder_Dragonbane wrote:

Bad fluff Does not make the 4.5 sub-classes better than the base classes. All it does is up the limited page count.

bad fluff? where is that? i love all the fluff from the sub-classes and i like the more focus classes....with weaponmaster....he can be to many things at once...and i just want more focus...get why when i finally did make one...i just picked shield powers and that was it, i like that they can pick so many but i also dont like that they can pick so many

i like more focus then lots of powers to pick from. that is why i would pick knight and slayer ove weaponmaster, knight and slayer know what they are...weaponmaster...does not......slayer knows they are twohanded weapon guy, knights know they are weapon/sheild guy...weaponmaster just knows