Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 12  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Ultimate Defenders Ho!
3 years ago  ::  Jul 13, 2010 - 10:46PM #1
AlphatheGreat
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 1,547


Ultimate Defenders: Between a Rock and a Hard Place







You Shall Not Pass!    -Gandalf the Grey, Ultimate Defender



This thread is a compilation of certain builds that I have dubbed Ultimate Defenders.  To give some background as to the criteria I use, we must first discuss some Defender Theory:

We all are aware of what a defender is.  Or at least, we think we are.  Your Defender is the guy who takes the blows so you don't have to.  Sort of.  See, in MMOs this is the role of a Tank: make sure the enemies only attack you, and make sure they don't hurt you either.  It is easy to believe that this translates directly to D&D 4e, as the creators have designed a role parallel to the Tank.  However, there is no "aggro" to manage in D&D.  Your foes are controlled by an intelligent DM rather than a computer, and most DMs know better than to attack the meatshield just because he insults them.  This was a problem in 3.5e, as the big dumb brute didn't have much by way of means to keep things attacking him.  So the designers of 4e tacked some abilities onto the meatshields that enabled them to accomplish that purpose.  

This leads to the First Principle of defender theory:

Defenders are Specialized Controllers.


Defenders are Controllers Show

Consider the one thing all defenders have in common: a marking mechanism.  The basic mark simply says: as long as the target is marked, it takes -2 to hit on attacks that don't include you.  This serves two purposes:
1.  Reduce the impact the enemy has on your allies.
2.  Direct the enemies to attack you rather than your friends.
Both can occur in a regular encounter.  Everyone who has played a 4e defender for long has seen their marks obeyed and disobeyed.  An enemy disobeying the defender's mark does not mean the mark has failed.  After all, the enemy is less likely to hit with that attack.
Next consider that most defenders also raise their defenses as high as they can, to become the "meat shield."  +2 to all defenses is effectively a -2 to hit you.  -2 to hit your allies + -2 to hit you = -2 to hit.  That's a controller debuff.  By the same token, inflicting -2 to hit on a target is as good as gaining +2 to defenses against that target AND increasing your mark penalty on that target by 2.
There are a LOT of examples of this same principle, but the conclusion is clear: Defenders are controllers who specialize in a narrower range of control.  Specifically: keep your allies alive by directing enemy actions and blunting enemy effectiveness.


The Second Principle of defender theory follows right on the heels of the first:



Defenders Control Primarily through Catch-22 Tactics



Defenders use Catch-22 Show
Let's look at the classic mark punishment model.  If you, as a defender, mark an enemy, you have some means to punish disobedience to that mark.
It's easy to see that if your punishment is strong enough, no enemy will want to disobey your mark.  But at what point does that happen?  When you're dealing 100 damage?  200?  50?  Suppose it's 50.  If everyone is now attacking you and never triggering your mark, doing 60 instead of 50 clearly does you NO GOOD, because you never get to deal the extra 10 damage.  If the extra 10 damage took a feat to get, you're better off spending the feat on something else.  In particular, the usual wisdom is to boost your defenses.  Now your enemy is facing the choice between 50 damage, and -2 to hit you.  Maybe now 50 damage ISN'T enough to make them attack you.  So now you can crank up your damage to 60.  But then they won't disobey your mark, so now you boost your defenses.  And so it continues.

The direct conclusion of this analysis is that an effective defender will balance the punishment he gives out on mark disobedience against the punishment for attacking him directly.  Make no mistake, +2 to defenses is as much a punishment for attacking the defender as the mark's -2 penalty is to attack the defender's allies.  
This is control.
It is giving your enemies no good choices, and making them choose between them.  Even the defender's higher hit points are part of the catch-22: given the choice, would you rather attack the squishy(but hard-hitting) ranger, or the beefy(but weaker) warden?  The same problem with too much stickiness occurs if you are TOO durable: they won't go after you, and your excess durability is wasted.

So working the defender catch-22 consists of this general process:
1. Improve the "attack me!" until it outstrips the "don't attack me!"
2. Improve the "don't attack me!" until it catches up to the "attack me!"
3. Repeat until you run out of resources.

In practice, the sticky is easier to come by for some defenders, while others find it easier to be more durable.  Furthermore, boosting both sides of the equation often takes some creativity, and it's difficult to know from the build alone whether your sticky is stronger than your anti-sticky or vice versa.  The game is so complex that many (myself among them) believe you should err on the side of the sticky...at least that way you can tone it down in-game if you need to, and if the monsters are focusing on you, you don't have to wonder WHICH of your squishy allies they'll be headed for.

As a sidenote, just what kind of catch-22 you impose only determines what kind of defender you are, not whether you are a defender or not.  For example, if you are using immediate interrupts (like pre-nerf White Lotus Master Riposte) to damage enemies for attacking you, that simply hastens their demise, which limits the amount of time they can be harassing you or your allies.  In that case you are a Defender/striker.  If your catch-22 is all about improving your defenses and your mark debuff, you are leaning more heavily into your defender/controller roots.  If your catch-22 heals your allies, you find yourself dipping into leader.  And so on.  All are valid methods of protecting your allies.

TL;DR Version Show
1. Defenders are controllers.  Very specialized controllers.  In fact, they specialize in blunting monster attacks.
2. Defenders use Catch-22s.  Make all your enemies' choices terrible, and you've done your job.


So What's an Ultimate Defender?


There are a lot of good defender builds out there.  I don't want to give the impression that the builds I am labelling in this thread are the only good defenders.  Nor necessarily that they are the best defender builds ever made.  A high-dpr fighter is accomplishing his objective of defending his party by ending the encounter faster.  But that makes him a Defender/striker.

Rather, Ultimate Defender builds leverage defender tactics to an extreme degree.  In the end, an Ultimate Defender defends his allies by optimizing his catch-22 and controller aspects.
Common aspects of a good Ultimate Defender include: multimarking, heavy mark punishment, high defenses, reactive damage, strong debuffing, lockdown, action denial.

This thread exists to highlight such builds, and encourage players and optimizers to do likewise.  What explanations I give for my inclusion of certain builds will be brief at best.  If you have a build that you feel qualifies, post it and I will have a look.  I reserve the right to reject builds for utterly arbitrary reasons based mostly on my own perception of defenders (which is admittedly changing often).  I don't expect to need to exercise that right often.


The Builds


Darth Vader, Warlock|Swordmage/Avernian Knight/Sage of Ages - AlphatheGreat
  The Gist Show
Darth Vader combines defenderlock and swordmage abilities to impose debuffs and a heavy catch-22 between strong marking and high defenses.

Davy Jones, Paladin/Hospitaler/Ceaseless Guardian - Imperii
  
The Gist Show
Paladins have good debuffing, and Hospitaler+Weakening Challenge is arguably the most powerful mark punishment in the game.  Shielding Swordmages prevent damage.  An enemy tagged by your DC stands a good chance of HEALING your allies more than they hurt them.

Mr. Smith, Fighter/Kensei/Ceaseless Guardian - Lordduskblade
  The Gist Show
Mr. Smith takes it and deals it.  Dazes at-will, slows, debuffs, is very nasty to be around...for the enemy

   Variants:
      Super-Scrag, Fighter/Pit Fighter/Demigod - Herid_Fel
           The Gist Show
Essentially a higher-damage variant of Mr. Smith.  Still an ultimate defender, though.


Beowulf, Brawler Fighter/Kensei/Ceaseless Guardian - Lordduskblade
  The Gist Show
Beowulf grabs enemies, knocks them prone, and keeps them with him.  His unbreakable (I'm not kidding) iron grip on up to two enemies of your choice makes him well worth his spot here.

Crimson Legion Champion, Paladin|Warlock/Questing Knight/Legendary Sovereign - Inferenz
  The Gist Show
Combines defenderlock tactics with paladin debuffing, marking and durability to make for one nasty catch-22 build.

Ioun Grey Stone Marker, Battlemind|Fighter/Daring Blade - Mommy_was_an_Orc 
  The Gist Show
Battleminds and Fighters both have generic marks.  But Battleminds have more durable marks with weaker punishment, and fighters have temporary marks with strong mark punishment.  The hybrid of these two is a match made in heaven, especially with Blurred Strike fixed.  Try getting away from him.  I dare you.

Dr. No the Sigil Cartificer, Artificer|Swordmage/Sigil Carver/Ceaseless Guardian - Ytterbium_Dragon 
  The Gist Show
The Sigil Carver has one of the best multimarking punishments in the game: opportunity attacks against violators of your mark.  Don't let the "adjacent ally" requirements fool you, this is both one of the first Ultimate Defenders and one of the best.  I have posted the build here with the author's permission.  I may repost his explanation as soon as I have it properly formatted.
*note: The build here written assumes that free melee training and expertise are given as a houserule, which is fairly common.  As the originator of the build is no longer on the forums, that's the version available.  Just keep that in mind, you'll need to do some adjusting in any game without the same houserules.

  The Build Show
 Sigil Cartificer (aka Dr. No), level 30
Shadar-kai, Artificer|Swordmage/Sigil Carver/Ceaseless Guardian
Hybrid Talent: Swordmage Warding
 
FINAL ABILITY SCORES
Str 15, Con 24, Dex 15, Int 28, Wis 12, Cha 10
 
STARTING ABILITY SCORES
Str 13, Con 16, Dex 11, Int 16, Wis 10, Cha 8
 
AC: 49 Fort: 47 Reflex: 46 Will: 42, resist 5 all w/ 2 enemies marked
HP: 182 Surges: 15 Surge Value: 45
 
TRAINED SKILLS
Arcana, Endurance, Perception
 
FEATS
Free: Versatile Expertise (Heavy Blades, Light Blades)
Free: Melee Training (Intelligence)
Level 1: Hybrid Talent
Level 2: White Lotus Riposte
Level 4: Shield of Hestavar
Level 6: Mark of Warding
Level 8: Devious Jaunt
Level 10: Improved Initiative (retrained to Enhanced Resistive Formula at level 11)
Level 11: Psychic Lock
Level 12: Double Aegis (retrained to Total Aegis at level 21)
Level 14: Greater Swordmage Warding
Level 16: Greater Aegis of Shielding
Level 18: Improved Initiative (retrained to Superior Initiative at level 23)
Level 20: Improved Swordmage Warding (retrained to Swordmage Implement Expertise at level 22)
Level 21: Rapid Aegis Reaction
Level 22: Strength Through Challenge
Level 24: Triumphant Attack
Level 26: Epic Will
Level 28: Epic Fortitude
Level 30: Epic Reflex
 
POWERS
Hybrid at-will 1: Sword Burst
Hybrid at-will 1: Static Shock
Hybrid encounter 1: Scouring Weapon (retrained to Sword of Sigils at level 7)
Hybrid daily 1: Punishing Eye
Hybrid utility 2: Channeling Shield (retrained to Swift Mender at level 14)
Hybrid encounter 3: Transposing Lunge
Hybrid daily 5: Shielding Fire
Hybrid utility 6: Regeneration Infusion (retrained to Swordmage's Decree at level 10)
Hybrid encounter 7: Repulsion Strike
Hybrid daily 9: Radiant Sigil
Hybrid utility 10: Healing Figurine
Hybrid encounter 13: Hypnotic Swordplay (replaces Sword of Sigils)
Hybrid daily 15: Hunter's Pursuit (replaces Shielding Fire)
Hybrid utility 16: Iron-Hide Infusion
Hybrid encounter 17: none taken
Hybrid daily 19: Hellfire Sigil (replaces Radiant Sigil)
Hybrid utility 22: Oni's Gift
Hybrid encounter 23: Prismatic Strike (replaces Repulsion Strike)
Hybrid daily 25: Planar Shock (replaces Hunter's Pursuit)
Hybrid encounter 27: none taken
Hybrid daily 29: Astral Thunder Blade (replaces Planar Shock)
 
ITEMS
+6 Shared Valor Starleather Armor (2,125,000), +6 Githyanki Silver Longsword (2,625,000), Opal Ring of Remembrance (2,625,000), Siberys Shard of the Mage (epic, 425,000), Shadowfell Gloves (epic, 1,125,000),  Dice of Auspicious Fortune x2 (18,000), Diamond Cincture (paragon, 125,000), +6 Cloak of Distortion (2,625,000), Ring of Giants (17,000), Iron Armbands of Power (1,125,000), Eye of Awareness (425,000), Planestrider Boots (85,000)

Inexhaustible Dragon Sovereign, Paladin/Questing Knight/Legendary Sovereign - Litigation
The Gist Show
Apply Divine Sanction to everyone nearby, consistently.  Now heal your allies a little, grant some saves, get them out of trouble, make your sanction weakening, be able to take a beating...Litigation's build does a whole lot of marking and a fair bit of everything else.  Watch the variants section for interesting variations...

The Man of Steel, Warden|Battlemind/Gladiator Champion/Topaz Crusader - BaronSengir
The Gist Show
As the first (I think) Dizzying Mace+Intellect Snap builds, this definitely deserves a place here.  Full defender hp, con-build surges, immunity to most of the worst effects, decent to high defenses, standard resist all, synergy between the warden and battlemind marks, robust multimarking all make this a very good defender.  But it's the "and more" that makes him Ultimate.
Intellect Snap dazes at-will, onto which Dizzying mace adds a -conmod to hit penalty.  On top of your mark, that's a massive at-will hit penalty worthy of the very best UDs.
Gladiator Champion and warden plug the holes from being a hybrid Battlemind, by making sure that nothing can get away from you.  
He is sticky, he is tough, he applies massive penalties and he has strong multimarking.

The Anointed Knight, Knight/Anointed Champion/Ceaseless Guardiant - I33
The Gist Show
The first essentials character I am adding to the Ultimate Defenders, this build has certainly earned its spot.  As a line defender, the Anointed Knight is arguably the very best.  Solid defenses, Come and Get It and some other miscellaneous tricks make him durable and sticky.  By grabbing Sonnlinor's Hammer for his mba(inflicts -cha to enemy damage), and boosting that with further penalties to hit, dazing, and granting thp to allies, not only is his main attack a brutal debuff, but he gets to use it as his "mark" punishment as well.  And that is the final cap: his punishment is against ALL adjacent enemies(no need to mark), and is an opportunity action.  Right from the gate, he's unbound by the immediate-action starvation faced by so many other defenders.  One of the very best Ultimate Defenders on the market, and he is totally item and campaign-setting neutral to boot!

A Save Haven, Swordmage|Warlock/Sigil Carver/Sage of Ages - billyh
The Gist Show
Like Dr. No, Save Haven leverages the ability of the Sigil Carver to punish more enemies in a round than the usual Immediate Interrupt defenders allow.  Building on the highly versatile Swordmage|Warlock base like Vader, he capitalizes on his mark punishment by specializing in slides.  Like Dr. No you want your party to gather round, but then, so do Magic Weapon Artificers.  High defenses and strong mark punishment make this an excellent addition.

The Inescapeable Fisherman 2.0, Battlemind|Swordmage/Gladiator Champion/Destined Scion - SongNSilence
The Gist Show
The concept behind the fisherman is simple: keep your enemies close.  It uses extreme stickiness as its main defender schtick.  Enemies can't shift away, if they try to move away they get knocked prone and slowed before they get there.  Expanded Swordburst and Thundering Vortex drag enemies in, and once they are in they stay there.  For those occasional enemies who are still able to attack your melee allies, you're still a Swordmage and Battlemind, with solid marking ability and Immediate Interrupt attacks.  Add solid defenses, defender hp on top of that, and you'll be dominating the battlefield as defenders are mean to do.  As a bonus, you're fairly item independent.  Most effective if your game allows both dragonmarks and dark sun themes, but still doable otherwise.

Set Hammers to Stun, Paladin|Fighter/Adroid Explorer/Reincarnate Champion - GelatinousOctahedron
The Gist Show
A shining example of using power selection as the primary route for defending your allies.  Stunning enemies again and again on top of the already decent defense package available for a hybrid Paladin|Fighter ensures solid disruption of the enemy's ability to target your allies.  With full defender hp and defenses, he loses little by way of durability.  In epic the stuns turn to dominates with the utterly abusive Royal Command of Asmodeus.


Thanks to Qballony and Ytterbium_Dragon for the builds that first tipped me off to the Ultimate Defender phenomenon,  to everyone in ##4e for the discussions that developed it further, and to everyone who has created Ultimate Defender builds.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 13, 2010 - 10:57PM #2
AlphatheGreat
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 1,547
Technical Notes Show

--To be considered, builds should be functional Ultimate Defenders for at least 1/3 of their career.  Less than this, and they aren't really useful to players looking for defenders.  So if it works all through epic, that's good enough to be listed.  Less than that and not so much.

--Accordingly, I plan to add in notes about when the build functions as an Ultimate Defender, when it functions reasonably as a normal defender, and when it is non-functional.  If you have a build you want added, please let me know when it is effective beforehand so I don't have to scour your build myself.

--Some builds will be too heavy in a different role.  That's not bad for the build, but it won't merit UD status necessarily.  Striking Paladins and Fighters aren't Ultimate Defenders...they are strikers who can defend.  An Ultimate Defender is a specialist.  If I reject a build, I will give my reasons in my reply.

Glossary:

Catch-22, noun: 2. any illogical or paradoxical problem or situation; dilemma  --Dictionary.com
Defenderlock: A class of warlocks that use defender tactics, see Defenderlock by AlphatheGreat
Sticky: how well a defender keeps enemies from escaping punishment, especially by preventing or limiting movement.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 13, 2010 - 11:01PM #3
lordduskblade
Date Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 8,387
Excellent! It's finally up.

I liked the initial treatise that described what a Defender did and how optimization of these aspects worked. I also like the description of what an Ultimate Defender is. Last but not least, I really like the lineup of concepts that made the list (yay! 2 of mine did, too).

A thread along these has been long overdue, and it's about time you staked your claim as the inventor of the Ultimate Defender phrase.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 5:57AM #4
AlphatheGreat
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 1,547
Thanks, ldb!



Fixed the links, added Ytterbium_Dragon's Sigil Cartificer build (modified by him to accommodate the latest rules updates).
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 7:30AM #5
LlamasNotsheep
Date Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 907
This thread makes me happy in the pants.  No joke.
[20:53] [SadisticFish] yeah Llamas convinced me
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 12:17PM #6
AlphatheGreat
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 1,547
Added some technical notes in the second post.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 2:09PM #7
Darenth
Date Joined: Apr 5, 2010
Posts: 71
Gah I hate seeing Catch 22 so many times in one post.  It's used incorrectly on the boards, and everytime I run across it I have to take a second and remind myself it actually means something different here.  I'm not trying to change it, that's an uphill battle I can't win.  Ah well.

I do like the deeper analysis of Defender's here, although I disagree on some of the way things are characterized.  While doing damage back to the enemy for attacking you (or even with mark punishment if they attack someone else) is useful towards ending the battle and I respect that it in a secondary fashion does reduce the damage intake of the battle, I don't think of that as a product of being a defender anymore than I think of the Leader roles damage as a way to end battles faster.  I see that extra damage as just increasing the overall strikerness of the team.

The defender role is about reducing damage and controlling the flow of incoming damage.  This overlaps somewhat with the controller role, but I do think that there are aspects of what a defender does that is more specialized and entirely separate.  A major factor of that is convincing or forcing enemies to attack the defender, another major factor of that is surviving it.  Reflected damage doesn't directly boost your survivability (except in a roundabout fashion).  If you are sticky enough to cause every enemy to attack you, no amount of damage return is going to save you if your actual survivability is low.  Rather than lumping survivability and damage reflection mechanics I think they be separated out.

Edit:  I do want to mention that my points are more nitpick than criticism, and as a whole I think this will be a truly epic collection of characters and concepts that will be a more useful resource then any other collection of characters on the board.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 5:21PM #8
Herid_Fel
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 2,565
I know I didn't come up with a fancy name (I call him Super-Scrag after the character I based him on), but I've got a variant of Mr. Smith that looks like it works rather well. I don't get to daze with OAs in epic, but I've got slightly better defenses and a good capability to get some nasty damage off. The link is here.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 5:25PM #9
DM_Ken
Date Joined: Aug 8, 2009
Posts: 189

Jul 14, 2010 -- 2:09PM, Darenth wrote:

Gah I hate seeing Catch 22 so many times in one post.  It's used incorrectly on the boards, and everytime I run across it I have to take a second and remind myself it actually means something different here.  I'm not trying to change it, that's an uphill battle I can't win.  Ah well.

I do like the deeper analysis of Defender's here, although I disagree on some of the way things are characterized.  While doing damage back to the enemy for attacking you (or even with mark punishment if they attack someone else) is useful towards ending the battle and I respect that it in a secondary fashion does reduce the damage intake of the battle, I don't think of that as a product of being a defender anymore than I think of the Leader roles damage as a way to end battles faster.  I see that extra damage as just increasing the overall strikerness of the team.

The defender role is about reducing damage and controlling the flow of incoming damage.  This overlaps somewhat with the controller role, but I do think that there are aspects of what a defender does that is more specialized and entirely separate.  A major factor of that is convincing or forcing enemies to attack the defender, another major factor of that is surviving it.  Reflected damage doesn't directly boost your survivability (except in a roundabout fashion).  If you are sticky enough to cause every enemy to attack you, no amount of damage return is going to save you if your actual survivability is low.  Rather than lumping survivability and damage reflection mechanics I think they be separated out.

Edit:  I do want to mention that my points are more nitpick than criticism, and as a whole I think this will be a truly epic collection of characters and concepts that will be a more useful resource then any other collection of characters on the board.



How is it you feel catch-22 is being misused? It means a no-win situation; or, "damned if you do, damned if you don't". It originates from a novel, and from that, here is the origin...

"There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a  concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and  immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do  was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would  have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and  sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew  them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was  sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute  simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle."

If he was sane, meaning he didn't want to go into danger, he had to go into danger. If he was crazy, meaning he didn't care about danger, he didn't have to go into danger..

As I see it being used on the boards here primarily, a defender sets up a similar situation for a target - he either wants to attack the defender but can't (or such an attack is made meaningless), or he wants to attack the defender's allies but can't (or such attacks bring him damage, status effects, or reduced damage to his target)... meaning he has no good choice.

I suppose it isn't 100% the same, but it is so similar that I don't see any rationale to complain about the usage.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jul 14, 2010 - 5:26PM #10
AlphatheGreat
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 1,547
Added a Glossary, with a dictionary definition of Catch-22.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 12  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing