Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 8  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Mike Mearls new D&D Manager
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 7:33AM #1
mudbunny
Date Joined: Sep 28, 2006
Posts: 8,805
Congrats Mike!!

His post about it from ENWorld posted below:

It's funny, because it almost feels like I've won some sort of election.  I'm acutely aware of the pressure of the position, the expectations,  and the current atmosphere among D&D fans. I think I had a few  minutes of ecstasy. Since then, it's been a long week and a lot of  thinking.

This is also a new position in the department. I'm taking on a lot of  Bill Slavicsek's responsibilities. Bill's responsibilities have  broadened to include more things like boardgames, novels, Heroscape, and  so on. There's a lot more to D&D than just the RPG. The RPG is my  corner to play in, while Bill looks over the entirety of D&D.

Believe me, I realize how difficult this job is. There are far more  paths that lead to my screwing up than to my doing a good job. It's the  geek equivalent of running a professional sports team. Do well, and  everyone loves you. Screw up, and you'll never hear the end of it.

There's something pretty basic to the job, though. The gist of it, when  you boil it all down, isn't rocket science.

Way back in the misty days of the 1980s, when I first discovered  D&D, I thought Gary Gygax, Tom Moldvay, Doug Niles, Tracy Hickman,  and the entire TSR crew were demigods. I loved poring over Dragon  magazine, reading through adventures like Forgotten Temple of Tharizdun  again and again, and studying the DMG. I devoured the Dragonlance novels. I fought  battles across our basement floor with legions of BattleSystem counters.  I filled the few, precious pieces of graph paper I had with dungeons. I  designed classes and monsters. I loved D&D.

Then, something happened. TSR dropped Gary. Greyhawk was pushed aside.  When 2e came out, I was torn. There were plenty of things to like about  the game, but the attitude around it was off. It almost seemed like the  people behind D&D didn't particularly care for the way I loved  D&D. Maybe I was completely irrational, but the game felt changed in  some insidious way.

As time went on, that feeling only increased. There were bright spots,  most notably Dungeon magazine, but a lot of the stuff TSR put out didn't  really speak to why I fell in love with D&D in the first place. I  wanted to love D&D, but it wasn't really clear that the company  behind D&D wanted to return that love.

I actually stopped playing D&D for a few years. I ran a grand total  of one (terrible) campaign in college. I wasn't really sure that D&D  was something I'd be involved with anymore. I bought a PS 1 and started  playing lots of console games. I ended up sticking with RPGs, but I  kept to games like Deadlands and Unknown Armies.

Then something pretty cool happened. In 1999, at my very first GenCon, I  sat in the audience as Ryan Dancey announced 3rd edition. It was like a  religious revival. One presentation and free t-shirt later, and I was a  complete convert. My friend Nate called it a money grab, an appeal to  munchkins. I think my exact response was, "**** you dude. This is the  best thing that's ever happened to D&D."

For whatever reason, the entire presentation of 3e's announcement felt like it had been directed  straight at me. I was a complete D&D goob again. Hallelujah, praise  Gygax, my faith was restored.

A year later, my faith had been well-placed. 3e was awesome. D&D felt like the game I always  had wanted it to be.

In looking back, I think that my job is fairly simple. I want people to  love D&D. I want people to feel like the game is in good hands, that  the hand at the tiller is confident, smart, and genuinely interested in  the good of the game.

It's easy for me to look at this as the chance for me to make D&D  into the game I always wanted it to be, but that would be disingenuous.  It'd be the height of vanity, a monument to arrogance. D&D can't be a  game that caters to a single person. It's bigger than that. It lives  and dies by the collected spirit of every person that's ever picked up a  d20, put pencil to graph paper, or leaned close to the table as the  last character standing, clutching his last hit point, rolled his attack  against the BBEG.

Of course, actually doing that isn't simple, but it helps to have a  goal. I can't force anyone to love D&D. I can't legislate the game  into popularity, or commission a survey that will tell me exactly what  to do.

What I can do, though, is watch, listen, and learn. I can put everything  I have into D&D and hope for the best. At the end of the day, you  guys get to judge whether I'm doing a good or screwing up by buying or  avoiding the products I help make. That gets back to the election thing.  You guys didn't put me into office, but you sure as Hell get the chance  to kick me out.

If you have any questions, the best way to get in touch is by dropping a  line to my work email address (it's my first name dot last name at  wizards dot com, or drop a line to dndinsider at wizards dot com). I  can't answer everything, but I'll try. I'll also record answers to  interesting questions on the podcast. I'm on vacation this week. I like  reading web forums to see what's up, but they're not always the best  place to answer questions.


Mudbunny
SVCL for DDI

Before you post, think of the Monkeysphere

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 7:45AM #2
Agora
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2009
Posts: 205
Sounds like the game is in good hands.  I love reading stuff like this ^_^
"All I hear now is the sound of the Charop boards and
all their builds popping" ~ Mithreinmaethor

"Oh I forgot, common sense no longer exists. It died with the invent of the internet age. ~ Thunder_Dragonbane
~ 1001 Reasons to Love 4E
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 7:56AM #3
bone_naga
Date Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 10,097
Good stuff.
Owner and Proprietor of the House of Trolls.
God of ownership and possession.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 8:03AM #4
Hocus-Smokus
Date Joined: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 7,214
How he can feel that 3E was a return to the basic premise of D&D and 2E was not is beyond me, but whatever floats his boat. 3E was the biggest departure from the rules since OD&D became AD&D (actually moreso, but that's for another thread). The entire presentation feels a little more like corporate butt-kissing than honest reflection, but hey...times are hard. Do what you need to do to keep your job.

That being said, I'm sure the game is in good hands. He seems to have his work priorities in order, and, coming from soneone who owns two businesses, that's a damn good start. And the butt-kissing part can be very beneficial, especially if you have a boss like me who rather likes having his butt kissed. He seems very aware that it's the fans who can ultimately sink him (and WotC in general), so catering to them as a whole is a very wise decision. Time will tell, as the old saying goes.
In fond memory of Mark "Wrecan" Monack.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 8:44AM #5
oxybe
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 5,176
i don't see where he says 3rd ed is a return to the basic premise. from what i understood 2nd ed changed enough from his original D&D experience, that it turned him off it.

when he got back into the game, it finally felt right again after having been away for a long time. it's probably a "le plus sa change..." kinda thing. maybe it was the new and shiney stuff or just the overall experience that made it. it's weird, but it happens.
3rd ed SRD, character sheets, errata & free modules
4th ed test drive - modules, starter rules, premade characters and character builder & character sheet, errata
Free maps and portraits, dice, printable graph paper, campaign managing website, image manipulation program + token maker & zone markers

"All right, I've been thinking. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back. GET MAD! I DON'T WANT YOUR **** LEMONS! WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO WITH THESE?! DEMAND TO SEE LIFE'S MANAGER! Make life RUE the day it thought it could give CAVE JOHNSON LEMONS! DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?! I'M THE MAN WHO'S GONNA BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN! WITH THE LEMONS! I'm gonna get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that's gonna BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN!"
-Cave Johnson, Portal 2
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 9:00AM #6
thaX
Date Joined: Mar 27, 2004
Posts: 3,708
Keep in mind, when 3rd edition came out, the overall problems with the system (Wizards becoming all powerful, fighters feat quests, all out Multi class weakening the character) wasn't apparent until the group began to play beyond a certain level (8th? 10th?). It was made more apparent, oddly enough, when the .5 system was released.
Terms you should know...

Spoiler: Show

Kit Build - A class build that is self sustaining and has mechanical differences than the normal scale. Started in Essentials. Most are call their own terms, though the Base Class should be said in front of their own terms (Like Assassin/Executioner)

Power Points - A mechanic that was wedged into the PHB3 classes (with the exception of the Monk) from the previous editions. This time, they are used to augment At Wills to be Encounters, thus eliminating the need to choose powers past 4th level.

Mage Builds - Kit builds that are schools of magic for the Wizard. A call back to the previous editions powering up of the wizard. (Wizard/Necromancer, for example) Unlike the previous kit builds, Wizards simply lose their Scribe Rituals feature and most likely still can choose powers from any build, unlike the Kit Builds.

Parcel System - A treasure distribution method that keeps adventurers poor while forcing/advising the DM to get wish lists from players. The version 2.0 rolls for treasure instead of making a list, and is incomplete because of the lack of clarity about magic item rarity.


ha ha Show

Mar 31, 2011 -- 10:46AM, wrecan wrote:

They will Essentialize the Essentials classes, otherwise known as Essentials2.

The new sub-sub-classes will be:

    * Magician.  A subsubclass of Mage, the magician has two implements, wand and hat, one familiar (rabbit) and series of basic tricks.
    * Crook.  A subsubclass of Thief, the Crook can only use a shiv, which allows him to use his only power... Shank.
    * Angry Vicar, a subsubclass of warpriest, the angry vicar has two attacks -- Shame and Lecture.
    * Hitter.  A subsubclass of Slayer, the Hitter hits things.
    * Gatherer.  A subsubclass of Hunter, it doesn't actually do anything, but pick up the stuff other players might leave behind.

Future Essentials2 classes include the Security Guard (Sentinel2), the Hexknife (Hexblade2), the Webelos (Scout2), the Gallant (Cavalier2) and the Goofus (Knight2).

These will all be detailed in the box set called Heroes of the Futile Marketing.


(Though what they should really release tomorrow is the Essentialized version of the Witchalok!)


Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 9:37AM #7
T-Mack
Date Joined: Jul 2, 2008
Posts: 1,303
I like him.  It'll be fun to see where he takes this thing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 9:52AM #8
Hocus-Smokus
Date Joined: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 7,214

May 16, 2010 -- 8:44AM, oxybe wrote:


when he got back into the game, it finally felt right again after having been away for a long time. it's probably a "le plus sa change..." kinda thing. maybe it was the new and shiney stuff or just the overall experience that made it. it's weird, but it happens.




Point taken. I went through it, myself.

In fond memory of Mark "Wrecan" Monack.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 9:54AM #9
LFK
Date Joined: Sep 4, 2007
Posts: 3,966

May 16, 2010 -- 8:03AM, Hocus-Smokus wrote:

How he can feel that 3E was a return to the basic premise of D&D and 2E was not is beyond me, but whatever floats his boat. 3E was the biggest departure from the rules since OD&D became AD&D (actually moreso, but that's for another thread). The entire presentation feels a little more like corporate butt-kissing than honest reflection, but hey...times are hard. Do what you need to do to keep your job.

That being said, I'm sure the game is in good hands. He seems to have his work priorities in order, and, coming from soneone who owns two businesses, that's a damn good start. And the butt-kissing part can be very beneficial, especially if you have a boss like me who rather likes having his butt kissed. He seems very aware that it's the fans who can ultimately sink him (and WotC in general), so catering to them as a whole is a very wise decision. Time will tell, as the old saying goes.



Even though I've grown my share of rancour towards 3e over the years I do have to say that when 3e was announced I felt very similar.

Of course at the time my tastes were also different than they became during the last decade: we were still happily playing 2e, but games like Deadlands and Alternity were challenging our notions of what mechanics should look like; the CRPGs that I played, like Daggerfall and Fallout and Ultima, were just as full of dense, bizarre quirks as D&D.

3e provided exactly what I wanted... in 1999. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  May 16, 2010 - 11:41AM #10
AbdulAlhazred
Date Joined: Jan 9, 2009
Posts: 10,302

May 16, 2010 -- 8:44AM, oxybe wrote:

i don't see where he says 3rd ed is a return to the basic premise. from what i understood 2nd ed changed enough from his original D&D experience, that it turned him off it.

when he got back into the game, it finally felt right again after having been away for a long time. it's probably a "le plus sa change..." kinda thing. maybe it was the new and shiney stuff or just the overall experience that made it. it's weird, but it happens.




Yeah, I personally find it quite odd as well. My experience of 2e was that it was vastly disappointing that the game was so utterly slavishly THE SAME as 1e. It was definitely a polishing of a few rough edges of the system but considering that 1e characters can simply drop into 2e with nothing more than a couple minor changes to 2-3 numbers says a lot about how trivial the changes really were.

All it really proves though is how differently the game works for different people and what aspects of it they latch onto.

In any case I'm sure there are not going to be any radical changes. 4e is pretty well firmly set in stone at this point and regardless of who is directing its development its not going to change significantly this late in the day. What I get out of this is the person in charge is an experienced developer who's been a key part of the team from the start. That's probably a good thing, the game has a strong advocate.

That is not dead which may eternal lie
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 8  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing