|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 1:07PM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2009
|
so i created a lvl 1 human monk for the RPGA undermountain mods and i choose harmonious thunder for obvious reasons. until it gets erratad its an instagib, i figured i could get away with using it at an event because they play raw, no house rules. so in the campaign he threw the bbeg at us so i poped HT and an action point to attack again for the instagib and he house ruled on the spot the damage can only bounce from melee or ranged attacks, house ruled me! At a published event!
am i mad for no reason or is this wrong?
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 1:24PM
#2
|
|
|
so i created a lvl 1 human monk for the RPGA undermountain mods and i choose harmonious thunder for obvious reasons. until it gets erratad its an instagib, i figured i could get away with using it at an event because they play raw, no house rules. so in the campaign he threw the bbeg at us so i poped HT and an action point to attack again for the instagib and he house ruled on the spot the damage can only bounce from melee or ranged attacks, house ruled me! At a published event!
am i mad for no reason or is this wrong?
Not speaking on the validaty of the power you used nor whether or not RPGA should do house ruling (IMO, they shouldn't)
It sounds like you knew that it would be raw and no house rules. Even if this isn't the case, the DM has the responsibility to inform the players of any house rules before hand (or interruptations, like how to handle Charging's "directly" text), not right when it comes up and then nerfing the player. We've had a few games where we tried something, our DM goes "I don't like that, next time/session it'll be like this..." That's the proper way to do it, let the player do it the way they were thinking it works and inform them that it's now house ruled.
I think you have reason to be mad. Personally, I would have fought it. Not only because it sounds like the event was supposed to be no house rules, but also because the DM completely sprung it on you and that's just not cool.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 1:29PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Jun 15, 2004
|
i choose harmonious thunder for obvious reasons. until it gets erratad its an instagib... he house ruled on the spot... At a published event! am i mad for no reason or is this wrong?
Well, if it's as unbalancing as you portray it... Part of the DM's job is to keep things fun (which can include smiting obviously cheesy wrongness, if that be the case).
Better to ask the question on the Character Optimization board or the RPGA general board.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 1:32PM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Dec 25, 2009
|
Harmonious Thunder can reasonably be interpreted in a fashion that involves it not instantly killing both of them. It's perfectly legitimate for an RPGA DM to disagree with your interpretation of RAW.
Until CustServ or other official source says "yes, harmonious thunder kills both of them", he isn't wrong to disallow it, unless his interpretation is clearly incorrect.
The difference between madness and genius is determined only by degrees of success.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 1:37PM
#5
|
|
|
How is the Harmonious Thunder supposed to be an instagib...?
(edit) Oh wait, let me guess: You hit A, it damages B; B took damage so it damages A; etc.
Lol.
Kudos to the DM.
"At a certain point, one simply has to accept that some folks will see what they want to see..." Dragon 387
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 1:48PM
#6
|
Date Joined:
Jun 15, 2004
|
Harmonious Thunder can reasonably be interpreted in a fashion that involves it not instantly killing both of them. It's perfectly legitimate for an RPGA DM to disagree with your interpretation of RAW.
It looks like even the CharOp board (here) wouldn't allow this in a game. Off-hand: if a player brings an infinite damage loop to the table, he shouldn't get mad when the DM nerfs.
Anecdote: I used a legit, near-infinite damage combo (from just the 3.5 PHB) in a public game... run by one of the original writers... and only because the party was about to be TPK'd.
I didn't get mad when he nerfed my combo; indeed I appreciated it (even though it ultimately meant some PC's would die).
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 2:07PM
#7
|
|
|
I don't much about RPGA but can DMs change rules like that
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 2:32PM
#8
|
|
|
I don't much about RPGA but can DMs change rules like that
Although my understanding is that RPGA DM's must abide by RAW I can't say as I feel bad when a DM doesn't allow such a completely obvious unintended result of a power. I mean, nobody can honestly say that Harmonious Thunder is supposed to be instant gib regardless of how poorly it may be written, it's not like the intent is even remotely challenging to discern.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 2:43PM
#9
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2009
|
when it gets re-written ill have no problem with it but as it stands theres no limitation on how much damage is dealt or when it stops. im upset because even though it was supposed to be RAW he changed it on the spot. (also some DMs have a bad habit of getting attached to their monsters, hes already TPKed every group he's DMed for at least once including the undermountain mod)
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 15, 2010 - 2:45PM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Jan 29, 2005
|
Well, as per RPGA, he was wrong... if that answers your question. He isn't allowed to actually change or create a rule. No matter how frustrating a broken power is.
|
|
|