|
3 years ago ::
Apr 20, 2010 - 11:16AM
#31
|
|
|
As much as I'd like to make up some hybrid multiclass for this...I think "I" fit pretty solidly into the role of Psion. The realm of the mind absolutely fascinates me, and while the dablings of a Wizard or Gifts of a Sorcerer are definately my style, they don't quite embody me like a Psion.
The eyes aren't only a gateway to the soul, but to the mind as well
"All I hear now is the sound of the Charop boards and all their builds popping" ~ Mithreinmaethor "Oh I forgot, common sense no longer exists. It died with the invent of the internet age. ~ Thunder_Dragonbane ~ 1001 Reasons to Love 4E
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 21, 2010 - 12:11AM
#32
|
Date Joined:
Mar 19, 2007
|
I would like to be a defender, probably fighter (or battlemind) because I believe in my own power and because I am a soldier. But that probably isn't me because I am kind of a passivist mostly because of my childhood and not wanting to be that violent angy piece of beep I was. I also used to play football as a defensive nose tackle which might make me a striker probably a beast ranger because I just love my dogs. I real don't think myself a controler at all though I might be a wizard with my love of books and learning. But no I think I am a bard because of my versitility in all things and how adaptable I am plus my uncanny knack at helping people help themselves. Probably be a valourous bard because I am rather brave and durable and I like to be in the battle. I would probably be a half-elf (again versitile) because I would take that feat that would let all use charisma just so I could tie everything together like I like to do in my own life, you know finding the connections. Playing a class that uses charisma would probably describe me best because I can't find a person that can't like me and I am headstrong. People describe me as a very funny guy and if I were a 3.X bard I would probably put ranks in perform comedy. I am a pretty good liar and good at getting people to do what I think is best (often I am right) so I would take a lot of interaction skills because I talk alot (I suppose you guessed) and knowlege skills because often I know what I am talking about and anything that my multiclass feats miss in skills I would probably take skill focus and skill training in. Probably hybrid with ardent because I am fascinated with the mind (psionics) and because I have a way of influencing others moods. I doubt I am paragon or epic so I guess I could speculate what I would be. I would probably be travelers halequin or jack of all trades or chameleon (if I could I would) and an eternal seeker.
So I am rambling, bottom line I think I am a hybrid Bard/Ardent Travelers Harliquin or jack of all trades, Eternal Seeker with training in all skills and skill focus and multiclass like everything.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 21, 2010 - 3:18AM
#33
|
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2007
|
I think I would be wizard, pison, barbarian or a mix of them.
I study urban planning at a university and enjoy reading popular science magazines. I think that university studies and a thirst for knowledge are clear signings of wizardry.
But on the other hand, the social science (and the urban planning program I’m reading has a lot of that) feels more psionic to me then the hard sciences. Also, as of late I have started to wish for some basic telekinetic abilities, just to close doors and stuff like that.
On the third hand I hade/have some rage-issues and I feel at home nature (I am fairly certain that I could roast a hotdog over a fire if need be  ) so a barbarian wouldn’t be to odd a class for me.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 21, 2010 - 1:28PM
#34
|
Date Joined:
May 30, 2005
|
Psion|Invoker all the way. I have very firm ideas about the world and how it is put together, and I'm attempting to formalize those thoughts in research to prove that I am right about the world. I'm certainly religious, but all modern day religions bother me to some extent, and so I simply have faith in something deeper than any concept than humans have yet formulated (although I'm hoping with my research to actually formulate what that concept is.)
I'm also very lazy. Physical activity does not become me. And book learning.. well.. I'm posting this because I'm avoiding looking up how the modification rule for systems of differential equations works compared to the modification rule for single differential equations. So, all my power is from me, except for the parts that come from some concept that existed before the gods.
Psion|Invoker.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 22, 2010 - 8:24PM
#35
|
Date Joined:
Aug 28, 2009
|
Ide be an Earthsoul Genasi Smat A$$ from the Kingdom of Thamecneics, I woula always argue and tell everyone thier wrong. So much so my enamys would become depressed and kill themsellfs, sooo i juts grab the loot and walk on by. Spuing info and insultes of ur Int and modifier.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Apr 25, 2010 - 7:02AM
#36
|
Date Joined:
Feb 27, 2009
|
Edit: I just realized that being a non-strength based warforged sorcerer doesnt make much sense, but I never said that I would make an effective dnd character!
If I became a dnd character, I think, first, I would be a warforged because when I was a little kid I used to imagine what it would be like if it turned out I was actually an android released into society as part of a secret government project. As for class I think I would be a sorcerer because I'm not out of shape but I'm not a good enough physical specimen to be a heavily martial class. Probably a non-strength based sorcerer. I would say wizard because I'm pretty well read and I enjoy learning things for their own sake, but I consider wizards to be like the uber-geniuses of the dnd world and that I am not. Sorcerer fits best because being born with innate magical powers gives a regular Joe the best shot at being a superhero, which dnd characters kind of are.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
May 02, 2010 - 7:16AM
#37
|
Date Joined:
May 30, 2007
|
I believe I'd either be a Thaneborn Barbarian, a Stonefist Monk, or some sort of Fighter.
I have trained for many years in martial arts, specifically Shotokan karate for the first 6 and then both Shotokan and Brazillian Jujitsu for the past 2. I hit pretty hard, but in the fights I have been in in real life I have remained relatively calm. Monk, check.
One of my favorite hobbies is collecting weapons. I have several walls of my room filled, and smaller weapons hidden in books, drawers under my pillow, etc. Weaponmaster Fighter, perhaps?
Finally, Thaneborn. I am strong, physically, which factors in all three of my choices, but Thaneborn Barbarians also require an insanely high Charisma. Many of my friends say I am quite charismatic, through my years in theatre, speaking, and I currently lector quite often at my church. Primal Power says in combat many Thaneborn keep their wits about them, even during a rage, which also fits.
In all honesty, I've tried playing monk, which was alright, I generally find fighters a tad plain, and when I play barbarian, I always play Rageblood. I'm not too fond of Thaneborn.
But those three seemed to fit the most. (While some might also say Warlord, I HATE warlords. I didn't want to write something up for one.)
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
May 03, 2010 - 5:55AM
#38
|
Date Joined:
Jan 11, 2008
|
I've always loved the idea of this kind of experiment in a role-playing game. If you really want to make things interesting (especially if you've known your gaming group for a while) try making a character to suit the person to the left of you at the table. DM excluded. I think one may get some interesting insights into how other people see you, plus you get to really think about the nature of one of your close friends. Though personally I've loved the idea of swords+magic ever since the bladesinger kit. Swordmage for me please and thank you 
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
May 03, 2010 - 9:13AM
#39
|
|
|
try making a character to suit the person to the left of you at the table.
Heh. My brother's pretty easy to turn into a D&D character. In real life, he's a pharmaceutical chemist. In other words, he makes potions that heal people, so he'd really have to be an artificer in D&D terms.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
May 03, 2010 - 11:37AM
#40
|
Date Joined:
Jan 13, 2007
|
I have 14 years of martial arts training and I am mostly inclined towards story-writing and painting.
I am also a bit of a loner and I really like rangers, but I prefer urban environments.
So I suppose a hybrid Monk/Bard with (urban) Ranger multiclass would do.
|
|
|
