|
2 years ago ::
Jun 12, 2011 - 6:27PM
#291
|
|
|
Here's one. With Spirit Summons you can have to SCs out there at the same time. When the Shaman spends a move action can they then move both SCs or just one of them at a time?
Yes. The power says that while you have multiple spirit companions, if you do something which applies to your spirit companion, it applies to both spirit companions. If you make an attack through your spirit companion, you have to choose which spirit companion that attack is done through.
So, if you have two spirit companions out and you use Healing Spirits, then an ally adjacent to each spirit companion gets the extra healing (meaning, two allies can get the healing or, one ally can get double-healing from being next to both spirit companions.)
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jun 12, 2011 - 7:17PM
#292
|
Date Joined:
Dec 10, 2008
|
Here's one. With Spirit Summons you can have to SCs out there at the same time. When the Shaman spends a move action can they then move both SCs or just one of them at a time?
Yes. The power says that while you have multiple spirit companions, if you do something which applies to your spirit companion, it applies to both spirit companions.
Thanks for answering, but I don't see where either Spirit Summons or Call Spirit Compansion say anything like this at all. Spirit Summons says that: 1. when you attack with a spirit power you choose which SC to use for the attack 2. when an effect applies to creatures adjacent to your SC, that effect applies to creatures adjacent to both SCs.
There is nothing that says that when you do anything that applies to your SC that it then applies to both SCs. To infer this from the sparse description of the power is a big jump in logic. Take it a step further. Does that mean if I move one SC six squares to the northwest that the other one also has to move six squares to the northwest? If I dismiss one of the SCs do I then have to dismiss the other one?
Your example about the use of Healing Spirit is correct as far as I know though.
To be fair, my question is probably unanswerable ... I couldn't find anything anywhere in any book that would come close to answering it. But opinions are appreciated.
OD&D, 1E and 2E challenged the player. 3E challenged the character, not the player. Now 4E takes it a step further by challenging a GROUP OF PLAYERS to work together as a TEAM. That's why I love 4E.
"Your ability to summon a horde of celestial superbeings at will is making my ... BMX skills look a bit redundant."
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jun 30, 2011 - 6:25PM
#293
|
Date Joined:
Nov 19, 2008
|
A couple places in this thread it is stated that a Spirit Companion can't grant Combat Advantage because CA is a 'condition'. Looking at the list of conditions (RC p229) it doesn't look like CA actually is a condition like Blind, Dazed, etc. So my question: if a power causes a target to grant combat advantage will it work against the SC? Here's a specific real example from a monster: Flitter (move; at-will) The monster moves up to 4 squares, gains a +4 bonus to AC against opportunity attacks, and gains combat advantage against any target that it ends its move adjacent to.
So if the monster uses Flitter and ends up adjacent to a SC, will it have combat advantage against it when it makes a melee attack?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jun 30, 2011 - 11:29PM
#294
|
|
|
A couple places in this thread it is stated that a Spirit Companion can't grant Combat Advantage because CA is a 'condition'. Looking at the list of conditions (RC p229) it doesn't look like CA actually is a condition like Blind, Dazed, etc.
So my question: if a power causes a target to grant combat advantage will it work against the SC? Here's a specific real example from a monster:
Flitter (move; at-will) The monster moves up to 4 squares, gains a +4 bonus to AC against opportunity attacks, and gains combat advantage against any target that it ends its move adjacent to.
So if the monster uses Flitter and ends up adjacent to a SC, will it have combat advantage against it when it makes a melee attack?
Thanks in advance!
Actually, no. The SC has specific rules for when a power is used against it. Is the power a ranged or melee attack? If so, then the power may continue. If not, then the power is ignored by the SC. It does not take status effects or other effects from a power unless the power specifically targets conjurations or the spirit companion directly.
At the same time, though ... Flitter isn't targetting the SC. The effect of the power is on the monster using it. Notice that it says that the monster *gains* combat advantage against the target. If it had said that the target grants combat advantage, then it wouldn't work, but the way it's worded, I think it actually would cause the monster to have combat advantage against the SC.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 01, 2011 - 7:23AM
#295
|
Date Joined:
Jun 30, 2008
|
I am going to read up on the rules comendium tonight and see if I can put a more up to date answer for combat advantage and the SC.
my handbooks & builds
Show
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 01, 2011 - 9:05AM
#296
|
Date Joined:
Dec 18, 2009
|
You cannot have combat advantage against the SC, because it is not a creature and even if you have CA against the shaman, it does not provide any benefit against the SC, because does not modify the shaman's defenses.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 01, 2011 - 12:13PM
#297
|
|
|
You cannot have combat advantage against the SC, because it is not a creature and even if you have CA against the shaman, it does not provide any benefit against the SC, because does not modify the shaman's defenses.
Where do the rules say that only creatures can grant CA? Besides, as I said in my previous post, the power is not making the SC grant CA, it is allowing the monster to *gain* CA against the SC. There's a difference.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 01, 2011 - 3:37PM
#298
|
Date Joined:
Dec 18, 2009
|
Hm you're right. CA is not listed as condition and the compendium entry about CA is not written in a way, that it could not be applied to the SC. If it was a condition, than it would be rather on the attacker as a positive effct, that the SC.
In Flitter's case it still does not work, because the power the monster uses is neither melee nor ranged, so the spirit is not a valid target for it. But another power, like the following should work: "minor action, melee 1: You gain combat advantage for your next attack against the target."
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Jul 02, 2011 - 6:20PM
#299
|
Date Joined:
Jun 30, 2008
|
I reread the sections on conjurations and combat advantage in the rules compendim and it looks like the revised language is very clear that spirit companions grant CA when flanked. The RC only makes references to targets granting CA, not creatures or anything similar. The CA is something a creature gets against a "target".
The exceptions are powers and effects that cause the target to grant CA don't work (you can't daze one, a shaman dazed doesn't make the SC grant CA, powers that says "target grants ca until EONT" wouldn't cause it, etc.). I don't think you can do a bluff check on a spirit companion to make them grant CA aince that would be an opposed insight check and they can't make skill checks.
my handbooks & builds
Show
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 10, 2011 - 9:11PM
#300
|
Date Joined:
Jan 26, 2010
|
Okay. I am probably being very blind and not seeing this either in the rules or in this thread. I get that the spirit can be targetted by melee and/or ranged attacks. I also understand how much damage they can take from that single attack before disappearing. What I can't find is...
What are the spirit's defenses against these attacks? Are they automatically hit by attacks of the appropriate type?
edit: p.s. Please reference where the rule is on this so I can explain it to others with the same question.
edit #2: NEVER MIND. I did a bit more reading on the thread and found where my question was already asked and answered.
|
|
|