Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 12 of 13  •  Prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Playing Vistani- Where's the Beef?
4 years ago  ::  Oct 12, 2009 - 10:03AM #111
AvonRekaes
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Feb 25, 2003
Posts: 1,579

Sooo....


8th Level Vistani with the Vistani Healer feat can perform Raise Dead once per day for free.


Anyone else a little suprised by this?

Planes Wanderer
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 12, 2009 - 10:13AM #112
acantha
Date Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: 138

Oct 12, 2009 -- 9:56AM, RCanine wrote:


Does anyone else find this design style—all feats modifying the racial encounter power (which we see in both Playing Vistani and Playing Revenants) boring bordering on obnoxious?




i think your satisfacation with the feats in the second article is probably proportional to the degree to which you optimize. They're wonderfully fluffy, but i didn't see much (anything?) that i would take over something else. Which, for the record, is fine. Were it not for the fact that i play with a bunch of knuckledragging, minmaxing, 3rd ed refugees i would likely build characters for fluf as much as crunch, and in that case i'm sure i would end up using a few of these from time to time.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 12, 2009 - 5:18PM #113
dieffenbachj
Date Joined: Sep 21, 2008
Posts: 590

Oct 12, 2009 -- 10:03AM, AvonRekaes wrote:


Sooo....


8th Level Vistani with the Vistani Healer feat can perform Raise Dead once per day for free.


Anyone else a little suprised by this?




I was horrified by it, as well as other possibilities; I've tried making noise in the announcement thread and the errata thread, I hope other people do the same and maybe get those ridiculously overpowered feats somewhat nerfed...


After all. Bard rituals were designed with the notion in mind "These can be cast for free once per day, that's a bard ability."


Consult Mystic Oracle, Raise Dead, Planar Portal... these feats were NOT designed with 'free' in mind, and the nature of these feats horrifies me. Up until now, I could always comfort myself that any 'power creep' was merely Wizards trying to get the power balance CORRECT. But these feats are over the top, they are the stuff of minmaxing powergamers... and they annoy me. I probably will not allow them in their current state, or at least, heavily houserule/restrict them.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 12, 2009 - 6:21PM #114
Herid_Fel
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 2,565

Oct 12, 2009 -- 5:18PM, dieffenbachj wrote:


Consult Mystic Oracle, Raise Dead, Planar Portal... these feats were NOT designed with 'free' in mind, and the nature of these feats horrifies me. Up until now, I could always comfort myself that any 'power creep' was merely Wizards trying to get the power balance CORRECT. But these feats are over the top, they are the stuff of minmaxing powergamers... and they annoy me. I probably will not allow them in their current state, or at least, heavily houserule/restrict them.




Which rituals, available through one of these feats, aid min-maxing powergamers? The advantage of the feats is that they give a free ritual per day. Otherwise, they're worse than Ritual Caster which gives access to all of the rituals. I think that Wizards has been fairly good about not providing rituals which break the game with repeated use, and the only thing that "cast for free" means is that the ritual can be done repeatedly.


I think the greatest risk for game balance is the possibility of free divination rituals. Given their restrictions, however, I'm not sure that I think that it's broken to be able to use one for free each day.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 12, 2009 - 7:31PM #115
jedrious
Date Joined: Jan 2, 2004
Posts: 331

Oct 12, 2009 -- 6:21PM, Herid_Fel wrote:


Oct 12, 2009 -- 5:18PM, dieffenbachj wrote:


Consult Mystic Oracle, Raise Dead, Planar Portal... these feats were NOT designed with 'free' in mind, and the nature of these feats horrifies me. Up until now, I could always comfort myself that any 'power creep' was merely Wizards trying to get the power balance CORRECT. But these feats are over the top, they are the stuff of minmaxing powergamers... and they annoy me. I probably will not allow them in their current state, or at least, heavily houserule/restrict them.




Which rituals, available through one of these feats, aid min-maxing powergamers? The advantage of the feats is that they give a free ritual per day. Otherwise, they're worse than Ritual Caster which gives access to all of the rituals. I think that Wizards has been fairly good about not providing rituals which break the game with repeated use, and the only thing that "cast for free" means is that the ritual can be done repeatedly.


I think the greatest risk for game balance is the possibility of free divination rituals. Given their restrictions, however, I'm not sure that I think that it's broken to be able to use one for free each day.





Actually, I think R&D knew what the biggest broken use of such feats would be, and that is why we do not have one that applies to creation rituals

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 12, 2009 - 8:14PM #116
Dragon9
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: Jul 16, 2002
Posts: 4,997

Oct 12, 2009 -- 5:18PM, dieffenbachj wrote:

But these feats are over the top, they are the stuff of minmaxing powergamers... and they annoy me.



Because minmaxing powergamers work really hard to be OP out of combat.  Wink

Sorry WOTC, you lost me with Essentials.  So where I used to buy every book that came out, now I will be very choosy about what I buy.  Can we just get back to real 4e?

Check out the 4e Conversion Wiki.

1. Wizards fight dirty.  They hit their enemies in the NADs. -- Dragon9
2. A barbarian hits people with his axe.  A warlord hits people with his barbarian.
3. Boo-freakin'-hoo, ya light-slingin' finger-wigglers. -- MrCelcius in response to the Cleric's Healer's Lore nerf
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 13, 2009 - 4:26AM #117
Herid_Fel
  • Dragon Slayer
Date Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 2,565

Oct 12, 2009 -- 7:31PM, jedrious wrote:

 

Actually, I think R&D knew what the biggest broken use of such feats would be, and that is why we do not have one that applies to creation rituals.




Heh. That's why I made sure to say "available through one of these feats". The biggest advantage these feats provide is with rituals that increase in cost as you level. Since this is almost always a bald-faced way to make sure that a ritual available at a lower level isn't automatically performed at a higher level, I don't mind making it available 1/day. Creation rituals produce a lasting effect, so that's a little different.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 13, 2009 - 2:40PM #118
Aluman
Date Joined: May 21, 2008
Posts: 2,081

Oct 12, 2009 -- 5:18PM, dieffenbachj wrote:


Consult Mystic Oracle, Raise Dead, Planar Portal... these feats were NOT designed with 'free' in mind, and the nature of these feats horrifies me. Up until now, I could always comfort myself that any 'power creep' was merely Wizards trying to get the power balance CORRECT. But these feats are over the top, they are the stuff of minmaxing powergamers... and they annoy me. I probably will not allow them in their current state, or at least, heavily houserule/restrict them.




CMO - You have to be able to answer the question with one word or a brief phrase, and it can't read the future.  Ergo: Not so bad, really it just the easy button around puzzle traps.


 


Raise Dead - Ha.  Right.  'cause you know 500gold means something when you are finding thousands of gold on the ground.


Planar Portal - Plot Device at best.  Its not a magic escape button nor anything else. 


To me the only large area of concern would be if they had allowed item creation rituals to be cast for free (It will happen eventually, but pray it is a ways off).  The rest of the rituals have only very little substantive impact if cast for free 1/day.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 13, 2009 - 6:20PM #119
Chris_Sims
Date Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 62

Oct 10, 2009 -- 8:55PM, blackmage88 wrote:

Oct 10, 2009 -- 5:38AM, Peraion_Graufalke wrote:

Chris Sims explained on ENWorld why the article's been divided into 3 parts:


tinyurl.com/ylmsuwa


Well, that's good to know. Wish it could be told to us here, but that's an issue that's already been discussed elsewhere. Anyway, like I said before, they're just working the kinks out. Fair enough.


I apologize for not posting that here. There are reasons for that, but I don't think any of them are particularly good reasons. Here I am, though, hat in hand.


Embarassed

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 14, 2009 - 4:52PM #120
Matt_James
Date Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Posts: 709

Bah! the Vistani article is great.  And, I prefer that they (the types of articles) are broken up into parts like this.  I see no immediate issues with the 4e version that Chris wrote up.  It is excellent and true to the race.  As someone who very much enjoys the fantasy gypsy culture, the Vistani thus far get two-thumbs up Smile

Matt James
Freelance Game Designer
Loremaster.org


Follow me on Twitter!
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 12 of 13  •  Prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing