|
2 years ago ::
Nov 21, 2007 - 5:50PM
#1
|
|
|
Many many thanks. Man this is gonna be sweet.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 21, 2007 - 6:34PM
#2
|
|
|
Q3218 Can a wizard use spell-trigger items of spells from their prohibited schools by using ranks in use magic device?
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 21, 2007 - 6:35PM
#3
|
|
|
Sorry about the double post, my computer was being retarded.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 21, 2007 - 9:06PM
#4
|
|
|
Q3219:When making an animal mount if it gains Improved Natural Attack from different sources can you apply it more than once?
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 21, 2007 - 10:49PM
#5
|
|
|
Q3218 Can a wizard use spell-trigger items of spells from their prohibited schools by using ranks in use magic device?
A3218:Sure can. A Specialist simply doesn't have those spells in his spell list, so he's the same as, say, a Rogue; He didn't take an oath to not use those spells or something stupid like that.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 22, 2007 - 1:10AM
#6
|
|
|
Q3220: Can I take a maneuver at the same time I lose the requirments for it?
Example:
Level 9 - Have: Blood in the Water, Death From Above
Level 10 - Trade Death from Above for Pouncing Charge
(Pouncing Charge requires 2 Tiger Claw maneuvers)
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 22, 2007 - 1:22AM
#7
|
|
|
Q3220: Can I take a maneuver at the same time I lose the requirments for it?
Example:
Level 9 - Have: Blood in the Water, Death From Above
Level 10 - Trade Death from Above for Pouncing Charge
(Pouncing Charge requires 2 Tiger Claw maneuvers)
A3220 I'd say no, because you first lose Maneuver A, before taking maneuvre B, therefore not abiding the prerequisite of 2 Tiger Claw Maneuvers
Stupidity should be painful!
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 22, 2007 - 8:21AM
#8
|
|
|
A3202 It is poorly worded, but RAW you just have to "move past the [enemy]". This is common w/ many of the Binder vestiges: you absolutely have to ask your DM, b/c customer service has been particularly bad about getting definitive answers that make sense w.r.t. the vestige abilities (see the consolidated binder handbook, third post, I believe, for some examples). Were I DM'ing, I would rule that you have to threaten the enemy, which (usually) means no ranged attacks.
EDIT: Cust Serv 071119-000034. We'll see what we get back, though I won't be online until next weekend.
reply!
This ability only requires one to "move past" their enemy to attack them. My question: can this be applied to ranged attacks? What constitutes "move past"? Does the character need to threaten the enemy?
Hi there James,
Thank you for contacting Wizards of the Coast game support.
Unfortunately the writing of this ability is very ambiguous. The intent however, seems clear. It should be limited to melee attacks and only against enemies that you move adjacent to. It seems that the ability requires you to move at your speed, and be able to attack each creature you threaten during that move one time each.
I will certainly pass this issue along to the appropriate departments for potential FAQ purposes. If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask and we'll answer as best we can.
Take Care and Good Gaming! 
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 22, 2007 - 9:30PM
#9
|
|
|
A3220 I'd say no, because you first lose Maneuver A, before taking maneuvre B, therefore not abiding the prerequisite of 2 Tiger Claw Maneuvers
A3220
Per Custserv, you can in fact trade away a maneuver while learning another that required that maneuver as a pre-req:
http://forums.gleemax.com/showpost.php? … tcount=487
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Nov 22, 2007 - 11:36PM
#10
|
|
|
Awesome!
|
|
|
