|
4 years ago ::
Nov 27, 2005 - 1:53AM
#51
|
|
|
SKR?[/quote] Sean K. Reynolds.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Nov 27, 2005 - 4:28AM
#52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Nov 27, 2005 - 8:17AM
#53
|
|
|
rakasta are mighty popular too!
I am the D&D guru on Wikipedia (because no one else wanted the job!) so check out the D&D Wikiproject at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dungeons_%26_Dragons!
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Nov 28, 2005 - 11:17PM
#54
|
|
|
In any case, whatever it/they might be that show up, I really hope it is more than just stat blocks. I'd really like to see something that I can make more creative use of, rather than just something I could have whipped together myself. That's what's going to determine whether I get the issue or not.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Nov 29, 2005 - 6:24AM
#55
|
|
|
In any case, whatever it/they might be that show up, I really hope it is more than just stat blocks. I'd really like to see something that I can make more creative use of, rather than just something I could have whipped together myself. That's what's going to determine whether I get the issue or not.[/quote] I prefer those kinds of articles too, although IMO anything Mystara related would be a pleasant sight. I really liked the article(s?) about the Hollow World, concerning the Lizardman servants of Ka, because they introduced something new to the setting. A new quasi-canonic element for us to play around with.
Cheers, Håvard
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Dec 02, 2005 - 3:07PM
#56
|
|
|
Good news/bad news. So Dragon is going to have something Mystara related in issue #339. It's going to be monsters. I can neither confirm nor deny the presence of phanatons. The monster article will have 12 monsters, IIRC. I think 3 are from Mystara and the other 9 are from Ravenloft and Greyhawk. All of the monsters have the same treatment in terms of connection to a campaign. Which is to say, not much. I have to toe the party line, of course, but I'll admit that I'm disappointed by the amount of coverage Mystara is getting. Other settings are getting more, but a lot of settings are getting much less. So... yay, Mystara! But also... d'oh, three monsters! It just goes to show that my ability to get Mystara included in the magazine is somewhat limited.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Dec 02, 2005 - 3:13PM
#57
|
|
|
the "next month" preview said 16... did some get cut?
I am the D&D guru on Wikipedia (because no one else wanted the job!) so check out the D&D Wikiproject at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dungeons_%26_Dragons!
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Dec 02, 2005 - 11:07PM
#58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Dec 05, 2005 - 6:10AM
#59
|
|
|
It just goes to show that my ability to get Mystara included in the magazine is somewhat limited. [/quote] Being that it's OOP, I'll take what I can get, and thank you for at least trying to somewhat support what won't be fully supported. :D
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Dec 05, 2005 - 10:42AM
#60
|
|
|
Being that it's OOP, I'll take what I can get, and thank you for at least trying to somewhat support what won't be fully supported. :D[/quote] or, looking at it another way, being that it's been OOP for so long - and given that the community is still quite active after so long - then there would appear to be a market for more than that.
|
|
|