|
4 years ago ::
Aug 03, 2009 - 8:00PM
#161
|
Date Joined:
Apr 10, 2006
|
I was happy to read about that change in presentation for the upcoming preview(s). I wish they would go back and update the Psion article though.
I just hope we don't get a string of posts complaining about how much space it takes up in dragon now...
Before posting, ask yourself WWWS: What Would Wrecan Say?
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Aug 03, 2009 - 8:24PM
#162
|
Date Joined:
Aug 17, 2007
|
I just hope we don't get a string of posts complaining about how much space it takes up in dragon now...
I think peoples concern was that it would replace content, not add to content. I don't think anyone cares how long the magazine is, just that previews not replace content they would have gotten otherwise.
WOTC Podcast:
"The web is a shortcut"
"Piracy was a big thing"
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Aug 03, 2009 - 8:26PM
#163
|
|
|
I hope that everyone has read the latest Ampersand Article. Bill makes an interesting note:
[indent]Tomorrow, our new debut content goes live, and you get the finished githzerai player character race to utilize immediately. We listened to what you had to say about the presentation of the psion, and we’ve made some major adjustments this time. You’ll get the githzerai in the more familiar article-style presentation, as well as in the D&D Character Builder, so reading and using the material should be a lot easier.[/indent]
I realise that there's a certain irony in cheering Wizards for agreeing to do things the way they should have been done to start with, but nevertheless I'll take this in the vein of, "We tried something new, you guys didn't like it, and we listened."
So - woooo! Yay Wizards! Thanks heaps.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Aug 04, 2009 - 3:48AM
#164
|
|
|
I just hope we don't get a string of posts complaining about how much space it takes up in dragon now...
Oh you know there will be.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Aug 04, 2009 - 6:04AM
#165
|
Date Joined:
May 21, 2008
|
I realise that there's a certain irony in cheering Wizards for agreeing to do things the way they should have been done to start with, but nevertheless I'll take this in the vein of, "We tried something new, you guys didn't like it, and we listened."
So - woooo! Yay Wizards! Thanks heaps.
I would suggest taking it how it worked
"You didn't want it in the dragon so we complied, and then you complained so we will put it in dragon in article format."
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Aug 04, 2009 - 7:24AM
#166
|
Date Joined:
May 22, 2006
|
But woe is you all (WotC excluded) if they don't put commentary in it!
I loved that they commented on their work to see what they intended...made me feel "insiderish"!
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Aug 04, 2009 - 3:34PM
#167
|
|
|
I 100% agree with the post!!!!  not all my friends that play DND have internet conections...there are still POOR people in the world folks like it or not, so I cant print the article that I pay for and take it with me ON THE GO to a house with no internet and use it....if this is how its going to be then I am done for sure with DDI, that is just a suxy business move that hurts table top gaming!!!!
|
|
|
