Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 21  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21 Next
Feedback Thread: Digital Insider #7
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 1:50PM #11
WolfStar76
Posts: 4,904
Date Joined: 08/31/05
  • Senior Volunteer Community Lead
  • Dragon Slayer
  • D&DI News Guide

Ranadiel wrote:

The article doesn't address my biggest concern which is wha will happen if you buy the year long web content pack and then you decide you want to upgrade to the client pack when that pricing scheme becomes available.


It's been stated elsewhere that if you've paid for a year of the "online-only" content, and they go live with "D&DI Full" in six months, you will still ride out your six months of web-only content - with the option to upgrade to the full package if you so desire.

Hope that helps.

WolfStar76
Community Advocate (SVCL) for D&D Organized Play, Avalon Hill, and the DCI/WPN
DDi Guide
Interested in judging D&D at PAX EAST? Fill out this PDF [Link fixed - 2/8/10].
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 1:54PM #12
KM.549
Posts: 609
Date Joined: 09/24/02

Kyros_Tachyus wrote:

I thought they already said it was top priority. It hasn't been top priority?


My thoughts as well.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 1:57PM #13
WolfStar76
Posts: 4,904
Date Joined: 08/31/05
  • Senior Volunteer Community Lead
  • Dragon Slayer
  • D&DI News Guide
I believe it's been their top development priority, but it may not be the top "team" priority - in favor of getting paid (which is reasonable).

Perhaps "focus" would have been a better word.

Then again, maybe it has been temporarily bumped in the list while they work on getting linked up with Digital River. ~shrug~

KM wrote:

My thoughts as well.


WolfStar76
Community Advocate (SVCL) for D&D Organized Play, Avalon Hill, and the DCI/WPN
DDi Guide
Interested in judging D&D at PAX EAST? Fill out this PDF [Link fixed - 2/8/10].
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:32PM #14
the8bitdeity
Posts: 155
Date Joined: 06/15/05
More of a technical comment. I subscribe to the RSS feeds, and this is the only feed that publishes itself twice. Any ideas why?
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:41PM #15
Klintus_Fang
Posts: 456
Date Joined: 02/19/02
I concur with others who say it is too soon to take this seriously.

$60 for a magazine subscription for which I have to invest additional money in printer supplies if I wish to have copies of the articles that can be used away from my computer? No thanks.

I may be willing to pay for the tools once they are available. But WoTC needs to demonstrate to me that they actually have the software development skills to pull this off before I'm going to start paying them for it.

Your priorities are also out of sync with my needs, which suggests you may be on a path that isn't going to satisfy me.

Just to summarize what we have now, and on the immediate horizon, and to explain how I feel about it as a customer:

Dragon and Dungeon Content: Excellent quality. But not worth the price of admission if the only thing I am going to receive is content in a digital form.

Compendium: Great idea that will probably be more useful as more splat books accumulate. But the interface is klunky, and you haven't worked out the kinks in the mechanism by which updated content gets added to the DDI compendium. Some of the PhB content in the compendium has been a welcom correction to the content in the PhB, but some of it consists of modifications to the wording of the PhB that, when taken at face value, break the mechanics. The Pact Boon powers that have been added to the compendium are an example of the latter. Whoever added that seems unaware of the fact that wording the pact boons in that way is inconsistent with the rules for Immediate actions. So quality control on the compendium seems to be spotty, at best.

Bonus Tools: these tools have no value. seeing these tools released lowered my faith in this effort rather than increasing it.

Character Builder: this will be good to have if it works. seeing that you want to start charging before you are even able to provide a date for when this core tool will enter a beta stage suggests to me that WoTC lacks the software resources to pull this off, unfortunately. I hope that isn't true. But seriously...you want money before you even have a date for a beta?? That's how software projects which are doomed to ultimately fail begin. I hope I am wrong, because I'd like this to succeed.

Character Visualizer: this is going to be about as useless to me as the current bonus tools are. The fact that you have this so close to the top or your priority list suggests that developing useful tools that will aid DMs and players in actual play is either not a priority for this project, or beyond the capabilities of the resources the company has comitted to the effort.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:41PM #16
aramis8
Posts: 4
Date Joined: 10/19/07

the8bitdeity wrote:

More of a technical comment. I subscribe to the RSS feeds, and this is the only feed that publishes itself twice. Any ideas why?


I think it is published twice, because the message is ob to seperate wed addresses.

Maior question: How I can pay for my subscribtion? It isn't ususal in my country to own a credit card.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:43PM #17
reveal
Posts: 60
Date Joined: 12/19/01
I'm happy for the answers to some of my questions but this bugs me:

...so you’ll probably get a couple of extra articles for free as we continue to publish three times per week...


Granted, articles for Dragon have been posted three times a week but the only thing posted for Dungeon this entire month has been an editorial. Where's the content?!

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:43PM #18
Hawke
Posts: 62
Date Joined: 01/29/07
Well, this is a huge disappointment. I really do wanna join on with DDI, but at this point it's too beta for me to pay anything for it. Last month's end was a disaster when it came to deadlines and I'm not expecting too much more from this month. Even if they do pull it off with good content + meeting deadlines, one month isn't enough to think $5 is worth it given wizards' track record.

Guess I'll wait for some reviews, but it'll take some strong words and likely the rest of the tools before I'll consider buying.

And I was pretty much sold on doing so back in May...
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:47PM #19
nmhall
Posts: 41
Date Joined: 09/10/08

Fox Reeveheart wrote:

I don't care what explaination they give me. So it wasn't ready for september so you just decided to put it into paying october? RIIIIIIGHT. Again it's all about money.


I'm a little disappointed as well by the decision to start charging so early into this, well before it seems there is a solid grasp on consistently producing content for the mags... having said that, let's not fool ourselves about WotC's intention to make money. Of course they want to make money, they're not running the Benevolent Order of the Merciful Mindflayer, they're a business. While I'm sure the people that work for WotC and create products for it love what they do, they expect to buy groceries and feed families at the end of the week, and in order for them to get paid WotC has to charge for their product.

Still, I'm unsettled by the chaos that is emanating around so many of their products right now...

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Sep 17, 2008 - 2:53PM #20
DarkSchneiderBA
Posts: 42
Date Joined: 05/26/08
I admit that I'm going to be paying regardless simply because I find the magazine content to be worth the money on its own for the moment, but I've really not been impressed with the way the "three times a week" content updates have been handled. Every month it slips and slips and there's a rush in the last week to get everything out from the table of contents for that month, one or even two articles a day.

While the idea of Insider is good and the tools would, if they behave as promised, be very nice to have for the most part, I have to agree with the general sentiment that it has not been handled well at all. If nothing else, promising it would be launched concurrently with the 4th Edition core books was a bad idea. I would almost have to suggest that each new component should have a free trial period as they come online, because I don't really envision many people willing to pay for it without making sure it works as advertised at this stage.

I applaud the idea, but abhor the execution.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 21  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21 Next
Post Reply
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing