Community

 
Dungeons & Dra.. D&D Insider 08/06 Welcome to Digital Insider feedback
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 25 of 31  •  Prev 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 ... 31 Next
Switch to Forum Live View 08/06 Welcome to Digital Insider feedback
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 7:05AM #241
Calion
Date Joined: Oct 21, 2005
Posts: 209

lachapakhan wrote:

once they switch over to pay service, i'm out.
i'm about to become a cantankerous old dinosaur, i guess.

i bought the basic 4.0 books, but they're never going to get used.
i miss my hardcopy magazine subscriptions and i'm probably going to play 3.5 forever.

good bye, wtc


Have you actually played 4e? Don't knock it 'til you've played it. There are bunches of people (myself included) who didn't like the look of the rules until they actually used them in a game. Forget the online content if you don't like it or aren't willing to pay for it. Give the actual game a try.

SyDarkSun, my 4e Dark Sun campaign
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 7:59AM #242
neoanderthal
Date Joined: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: 11

Calion wrote:

Have you actually played 4e? Don't knock it 'til you've played it. There are bunches of people (myself included) who didn't like the look of the rules until they actually used them in a game. Forget the online content if you don't like it or aren't willing to pay for it. Give the actual game a try.


I agree with Calion - I was not too keen on what i'd read and heard about 4e, but I played it for three days at the Strategicon Gamex 2008. I came away in love with the gameplay.

Try out the rules in a game, and see if you like them or not. Even if the online stuff isn't your bag (it isn't mine), you may find you like the ruleset.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 8:05AM #243
davethebrave371
Date Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Posts: 816

neoanderthal wrote:

I agree with Calion - I was not too keen on what i'd read and heard about 4e, but I played it for three days at the Strategicon Gamex 2008. I came away in love with the gameplay.

Try out the rules in a game, and see if you like them or not. Even if the online stuff isn't your bag (it isn't mine), you may find you like the ruleset.


These kind of comments hearten me quite a bit. I love it, and one of my players is 100% against it, so it'd be nice if he could play it and love it like the other six of my players did.

Yours,
Dave the Brave
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 8:38AM #244
neoanderthal
Date Joined: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: 11

davethebrave371 wrote:

These kind of comments hearten me quite a bit. I love it, and one of my players is 100% against it, so it'd be nice if he could play it and love it like the other six of my players did.


I know the feeling - in my (semi) regular gaming group, no one else has purchased the materials or expressed much interest in playing, and one of the players has even gone so far as to say he wasn't interested in playing 4E.

They haven't tried it, but I think they've just read/heard stuff that didn't sound like it would be fun. When I mention some of the stuff I find interesting and fun about 4E, they seem intrigued, though, so I take that as a good sign as far as getting people on board with the new rules.
I'm going to run a 4E game and give them a good taste of what the game system is like. I suspect once they give it a shot and see how fun it can be, they'll change their minds. It's still DnD, after all, it's just not the minutiae-oriented game like 3.x was. Once they get past the idea that they *need* all those prestige classes and feats to make their uber-characters with cool concepts, I suspect they'll have some fun using the new system to devise cool character concepts, rather than simply exercising their game-mechanic expertise.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 8:43AM #245
davethebrave371
Date Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Posts: 816

neoanderthal wrote:

I know the feeling - in my (semi) regular gaming group, no one else has purchased the materials or expressed much interest in playing, and one of the players has even gone so far as to say he wasn't interested in playing 4E.

They haven't tried it, but I think they've just read/heard stuff that didn't sound like it would be fun. When I mention some of the stuff I find interesting and fun about 4E, they seem intrigued, though, so I take that as a good sign as far as getting people on board with the new rules.
I'm going to run a 4E game and give them a good taste of what the game system is like. I suspect once they give it a shot and see how fun it can be, they'll change their minds. It's still DnD, after all, it's just not the minutiae-oriented game like 3.x was. Once they get past the idea that they *need* all those prestige classes and feats to make their uber-characters with cool concepts, I suspect they'll have some fun using the new system to devise cool character concepts, rather than simply exercising their game-mechanic expertise.


To bring it on topic a bit, one of the reasons I'm so pumped for the finished DDI is because Game Table eliminates a lot of the hemming and hawing excuses that this one reticent player has about not playing. I can get a reason out of him, and if its one where he has to stay home for whatever reason, I'll give him an e-vite to Game Table and he can be part of the game and even talk and listen through the program's proprietary voice over internet system.

Yours,
Dave the Brave
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 10:31AM #246
hellmute
Date Joined: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 4,431

mattdm wrote:

So future physical book products should be done for what, charity?


No but the whole idea of staggering and multiple version of the PHB as core, is just a ploy to make people think more highly of these splatbooks that just happen to carry the name of PHB on them.

Look at Hasbro. They own MANY board games. How many people do you see run out and buy a new copy of Monopoly each year?

I may be a bit old, but I think things should be built to last. Needing to replace a PHB each year to me sounds like you couldn't do it right the first time, so why should I trust you the second?

I don't expect to go buy a new 2009 car and have to get parts for it over the next few years until I have a complete car. 4th has no optional components as that negative connotation is removed because EVERYTHING is core, and nothing is optional. So in order to have a compelte 4th edition I must wait until ALL products have been released in order to play with a complete game.

I doubt I would ever buy the Monopoly board, then months later buy the money, then the thimble, then the car.

I buy complete products not kits. Even my models come as complete kits with extras rather than having to wait months to a year in order to be able to finish them due to lack of responsibility of the manufacturer and neglect to realize they didn't provide sufficient materials to complete the model.

They are changing the game concept not me.

Every other edition was complete with the core 1, 2, or 3 books; and all else was optional. But that term optional caused the negative connotation that making PHB II and DMG II and all other things as core will prevent in the future, and be strengthen by purposefully withholding parts of the game for later books to show that they are core, and not jsut optional. Thus making people have to wait for some marketing ploy to rip people off.

Wrong answer.

WotC seems to be the last company that thinks the consumer is stupid. Haven't we seen this from a gaming company in regards to RPGs and D&D specifically from the past where the head of the company thought that gamers were sub-human and stupid...Lorraine Williams?

That is all I can see in 4th edition and its entire design and marketing. Lorraine Williams all over the place.

I didn't like 3rd because I didn't, but 4th is a whole new animal whereas 3rd did not pull this kind of crap that 4th is doing to bring back the past.

All I can say is if WotC wants to act like LW, then I hope they all end up like her. Where is she now.......?

DDI also sounds like the Blumes get rich quick scheme of having all this stuff spread out to novelty items that would make a quick buck at the expense of the "brand" name with no regards for its future, but just to earn as much money as possible before letting it all fold under. But this is common Hasbro practice.

I can't see anything WotC does with these things in mind as being done truly by or for gamers, but rather by corporate shills. So make your fast buck quick, and maybe in the future when people are more interested in making a quality product with good communication with its customers, then maybe D&D will stand a chance again.

Other than that the whole PHBII, PHBIII, PHBIV....is only going to kill D&D.

Tell me why all of a sudden do we here about professionally printed power cards? Seems like something they didn't want to do, but low and behold here they come! Makes you wonder why WotC didn't think about that and just go ahead and make a firm decision on it rather than having to be told by the forums that people wanted them. Bow that they are coming it may be a bit too late since people offer them for free or can make them for free. Another poor decision made by WotC and poor planning that costs WotC and D&D.

THAT is where that money scheme should be. Those silly things dedicated to D&D that will generate future income for WotC rather than splatbooks in disguise as part 2 of the core books.

Its a damn wonder that dice aren't given freely with PHBs still at this day and age. Even a silly paper spinner with rings for each die type. The one part of D&D that WotC doesn't make....yet there are many of companies that could make dice so cheap that WotC could have them stamped D&D or 4th edition and sell them through their "Wizards of the Coast Premiere Stores".

Useful things rather than crap like a D&D Frisbee, that is where the continuing income is from.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 11:35AM #247
WhtKnt
Date Joined: Aug 19, 2002
Posts: 233

davethebrave371 wrote:

These kind of comments hearten me quite a bit. I love it, and one of my players is 100% against it, so it'd be nice if he could play it and love it like the other six of my players did.


I won't say that I love it, but I do enjoy it. It is a fresh look at a familiar game. I liked 3.5. In fact, I'm, one of the few who initially thought that it was pretty close to perfect (until True20 (see below).

When 4E was announced, I was one of the first to decry it as the herald of the apocalypse. But I gave it a try and found that, while it isn't the D&D I'm used to, it's different enough to be fun. What I'm arguing is the fact that they took away some of the familiar elements that made it more fun (like druids, for example).

Personally, I haven't even played 3.5 for several months, not since I found True20, which is IMHO everything d20 System should have been.

4E is a great effort and a fun game, but it feels like it is missing some things to those of us who grew up with D&D and have played it from the very beginnings. To see them pimping out those elements in an effort to stretch their earnings hurts.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 12:57PM #248
Scribble
Date Joined: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 365
Man Hellmute... Sometimes I wish I could just give you a beer and say... relax.

D&D is a game, something fun people buy to entertain themselves. And the 3 core books they just released work perfectly fine. I've used them several times already!

Compairing it to a half assembled monopoly is silly. Without the game pieces I can't play monopoly. Without the Artificer or the Barbarian I can still play the game of D&D I bought. The two are NOT the same.

WoTC isn't calling us stupid. They're selling us products we want. Just like when I was a kid, I had Optimus Prime... He worked just fine, but still I wanted Megatron and then when the time came I wanted Rodumus Prime.

You don't NEED anything WoTC sells in the future to play 4e despite whatever they decide to print on the front of the book. I'd say getting upset at a company for offering exansions is just greed man. You want the expansions and don't want to pay for it. Too bad. Make due with just optimus prime.

TSR comparisons are cliche'
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 1:33PM #249
Kentinal
Date Joined: Aug 2, 2005
Posts: 1,390

Scribble wrote:

Compairing it to a half assembled monopoly is silly. Without the game pieces I can't play monopoly. Without the Artificer or the Barbarian I can still play the game of D&D I bought. The two are NOT the same.


Yes the two are not the same, however I would argue D&D is not the same either.

White book had three classes, Fighter, Cleric (perhaps Druid, as that is reported the genies of the fantasy RP concept) and Wizard (or magic man).

1st, 2nd and 3rd included classes like Paladin, Bard, Druid.
4th does not yet include Druid or Bard and redefined Paladin to be any alignment (thus making the Paladin a totally new class). Not only excluding traditional classes from D&D they add core classes of Warlock and Warlord.
The Warlock under at least older rules needs to be Evil aligned.
The Warlord was a splat class. (1)

Also the races have changed as to what are basic races. I was not happy to discover the Kobolds were Dragon-kin in 3rd, but now we have a new Dragon-kin in 4th as well, that are also evil tended.

It is a new game or it is only parts of the prior existing game.

*Splat* races and classes are now core as opposed to what was core last edition. It is only part of a D&D game for any that played any prior edition, it of course is a complete game if it stood on its own not branded D&D and fully playable.

(1) The gender nuetrality gone is an additional issue as far as I am concerned.

Plans are always subject to change.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Aug 15, 2008 - 7:41PM #250
WhtKnt
Date Joined: Aug 19, 2002
Posts: 233
This just in from GenCon:

The Player's Handbook II includes "...gnomes, half-orcs, and shifters." [sarcasm]Oh, golly. There's a surprise![/sarcasm] I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it also includes bards, druids, barbarians, and a ritual for gaining a familiar.

Oh, look. It seems as though I'm correct after all.

Rich Baker says, on the FR sourcebooks, "...there are mentions of bards, druids, gnomes, and barbarians sprinkled throughout..." He goes on to allude that these will be in the PH2. Hmmm. I must be psychic.

Well okay, maybe the ritual for familiars will wait until the arcane splatbook.

I also note a goliath on the cover.

But perhaps I'm not being fair. After all, it also has "...ghostly-looking felines..." about which "James remains coy."

A handful of new material does not make up for offering us old material that was core in previous editions! I might be wrong, but I'll continue to protest until I see that my fears are unfounded.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 25 of 31  •  Prev 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 ... 31 Next
Jump Menu:
 
Dungeons & Dra.. D&D Insider 08/06 Welcome to Digital Insider feedback
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing