Community

I agree on that. I too will have to see it to believe it. And to see it, it had better darn well better be free when they want to "officially" preview it or I will never see it, as I'm not paying what they're asking for what we're currently getting.

Still, the quote Wolfstar has provided does remind me that they're promising a major boost in May. I have renewed hope that it may/might/could improve at that time.

Perhaps they've (at some point) decided just to cut their losses and put all efforts into an "actual" launch of the mags in may/june. (How I wish they shared that expectation with us in a meaningful way.)

Two things about that, though:
1. Why couldn't they have done that last August/September/October? Heck, they had from the annoucement in April 2007 (one year ago) to get this show started.

2. While I agree with Wolfstar that it is more important that they honor major commitments than minor ones, I have to point out that they have been very consistent in failing to honor a large number of minor commitments. This shows a concerning pattern of behavior. One, two, or even three times might be excusable. I personally can point to more than 10 instances (easily) in which they have failed to meet deadlines, deliver content they promised, or act generally as they said they would. In fact, at this point I'd have to say that their pattern has been one more of "unreliability and a lack of responsiveness" than the opposite.

160 pages per month, that appears to break down to 80 (or less) pages per mag. The or less depends on if the 160 includes other content pages that will not be in the mags.

Not sure how many pages of content has actually been released so far and of course page count depends on how one defines a page.

Dragon was around 120 pages, including advertisements.

I think Dungeon was about the same or a tiny bit smaller.