Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 181 of 181  •  Prev 1 ... 176 177 178 179 180 181
Switch to Forum Live View Why are people so obsessed with game balance?
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 8:57AM #1801
CTSShaw
Date Joined: Apr 28, 2009
Posts: 500

Maxperson wrote:

It might, but it isn't. The monsters were made complete, unlike characters.


No - that monster was built using the core rules - you should be able to fight him using a core character. If you can't then the system has problems.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 8:58AM #1802
DaidojiTaidoru
Date Joined: Sep 28, 2006
Posts: 3,105

magmer1 wrote:

Do you use gate for every encounter? Even if it summons My fighter has a shot.


If I can get it for free? Yes! And if a Balor summons a Balor no sub Epic non Evil character without SR can win. Though that's due to flaws in Balor design admittedly.

I consider your staff way higher on the cheese factor than Item Familiar.


True, but the staff was made via rules that are required to keep the game functioning, while item familiars are broken and not required to maintain system cohesion. Making the staff actually use charges would admittedly make my life more difficult and require only banning one spell or one feat. Preventing me from making a staff of Miracle at level 12 and using it at CL 64ish requires totally rewriting the Artificer class, item creation rules and the UMD skill.

BTW the real cheese of item familiars are for Diplomancer builds because you can double one of your skills with it. That's why my UMD is so high. In fact that, and the intelligent items ability to trigger magic items when I'm incapacitated are the only mechanical reasons why I took it. The rest was because it's awesome.

Sorry, I misunderstood what you were doing. Could you explain it?


The staff is made via standard item creation with the usual Artificer discounts. It only requires base CL9 instead of the normal CL 17 because Artificers can pull from any class for spell lists, including prestige classes. The reason it can be cast infinitely at no cost comes from Wand Surge (artificer only feat) and Greater Heroics (Bard spell that gives me the AP to use Wand Surge infinitely).

If you pull out enough cheese you can make a Fighter that can survive anything but a sneak attack and kill anything with HP. But the problem is with the same amount of cheese you can make a caster that can do ANYTHING. He can kill anything, survive sneak attacks and still has all those awesome utility spells that your fighter has to buy over and over again...

Without cheese, well it's still pretty terrible. A Fighter wins a battle with a sword he's down HP. A Wizard wins a battle with Charm or Dominate and he's down a spell for the day and up a meat shield/buff bot for a number of days equal to caster level.

True, though most npc casters don't have disjunction listed. Granted the wizards don't have anything listed, but I haven't seen sorcerer have disjunction.


Sorcs can't afford to. Not enough high level spells known. One of the problems with Sorcerers, though you can compensate with things like Shapechange.

Well...  At least we got custom avatars....
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 9:10AM #1803
Maxperson
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 22,863

bone_naga wrote:

So its ok for the initial release to has massive problems because we'll force people to buy our "patches" later? How is that an argument in favor of 3e?


It's not, but I wouldn't play 4ed on initial release, either. When it comes to WoTC RPGs, splatbooks make the game. Initial releases are fair, but not great, and then it goes from there.

And considering the core only is what many new groups have, it is actually very smart to design around that, because if they don't like their experience with core, why will they go and buy all your splat books?


New groups are in the minority. If they designed a fully complete game, they'd lose a lot of money from people who would not ever go buy splatbooks.

Not to mention that when it was first released, there wasn't anything but core (and 3pp products but we'll leave those out of it for now). This has to be one of the most asinine arguments I've ever heard.


Unless you can move me back in time to when there was only core 3ed, I won't limit myself to core 3ed. If it's available, most groups will have it. At this point I also won't consider only core 4ed, either.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 9:12AM #1804
bone_naga
Date Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 10,104

Maxperson wrote:

There's nothing elitist about it, and I'm sure it mattered to you. It just didn't matter to the 99% of the rest of us. When we elect a President, we don't count Hawaii's vote and then make a leader, ignoring the rest of the country. When you design a roleplaying game, you don't ask the die hard real life desiring few what they want and then make the game for them, you do what's best for the majority. When discussing a system that includes splatbooks, you don't bother with the opinions of those very few who only have core books. You go with the vast majority who use splat books.


Except that statement is flawed because while the majority of gamers will have splat books, you don't know which splat books. Thus, you can't balance the game based on any particular splat book or any group of splat books. However, all of those gamers should have core, so you can balance around that. Besides, if core isn't balanced, then the system is ****ed from the get go.

Owner and Proprietor of the House of Trolls.
God of ownership and possession.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 9:13AM #1805
bone_naga
Date Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 10,104

Maxperson wrote:

If it's available, most groups will have it.


So most groups will have EVERY 3e book in existence because they were available. Gee, I wish I had your gaming budget.

Owner and Proprietor of the House of Trolls.
God of ownership and possession.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 9:17AM #1806
Maxperson
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 22,863

DaidojiTaidoru wrote:

The staff is made via standard item creation with the usual Artificer discounts. It only requires base CL9 instead of the normal CL 17 because Artificers can pull from any class for spell lists, including prestige classes. The reason it can be cast infinitely at no cost comes from Wand Surge (artificer only feat) and Greater Heroics (Bard spell that gives me the AP to use Wand Surge infinitely).


I've never looked at the artificer, so I have a few questions.

1) Does it specify PrCs, or does it just say classes, because a PrC is not a class, it's a PRESTIGE class.

2) Does it specifically say that spells taken from other classes get reduced in level so that you can cast every spell in the book by level 9? If it doesn't, then it doesn't matter if you can draw on a level 9 spell from another list if you don't have the caster level to actually cast it.

If you pull out enough cheese you can make a Fighter that can survive anything but a sneak attack and kill anything with HP. But the problem is with the same amount of cheese you can make a caster that can do ANYTHING.


Which absolutely does not matter at all to this discussion. This discussion is only about fighters being useful, not a comparison of them against casters.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 9:19AM #1807
Maxperson
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 22,863

bone_naga wrote:

Except that statement is flawed because while the majority of gamers will have splat books, you don't know which splat books. Thus, you can't balance the game based on any particular splat book or any group of splat books. However, all of those gamers should have core, so you can balance around that. Besides, if core isn't balanced, then the system is ****ed from the get go.


It really doesn't matter which splatbooks they have. They'll have access to ways to make virtually all classes better, even if they don't have them all. Hell, I don't have them all, and I can do it.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 28, 2009 - 9:41AM #1808
ORC_Nashira
  • Is the Luck Child
Date Joined: Dec 4, 2002
Posts: 656
Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in it’s place.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 181 of 181  •  Prev 1 ... 176 177 178 179 180 181
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing