Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1339 of 1441  •  Prev 1 ... 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 ... 1441 Next
Switch to Forum Live View
Sticky: Rules Q&A FAQ + ask a simple question
4 months ago  ::  Jan 21, 2013 - 8:21PM #13381
kayakugun
Date Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Posts: 7
Does the 1d6 explosive pyre damage gain damage roll modifiers (ie incindiery dagger +damage on fire rolls, magic weapon enhancement bonus, sorcerer class damage)
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 21, 2013 - 11:37PM #13382
Plaguescarred
Date Joined: May 12, 2009
Posts: 16,534
Yes
Yan
Montréal, Canada
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 22, 2013 - 6:58AM #13383
Stormcleric
Date Joined: Mar 5, 2012
Posts: 31
Quick question: is it possible for the user of the 3rd level cleric encounter power "command" to silde an ally (because the introducing phrases are describing foe) but the target is "one creature". Which Will defense should then be taken ?
Thank your for your comments.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 22, 2013 - 7:16AM #13384
Plaguescarred
Date Joined: May 12, 2009
Posts: 16,534
Yes you can target an ally with a power that target creatures. It would target the ally's Will defense and if hit, the ally would be dazed until the end of your next turn and you could either slide him or knock him prone.
Yan
Montréal, Canada
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 22, 2013 - 10:12AM #13385
thespaceinvader
Date Joined: Oct 28, 2010
Posts: 9,664
In what sense?

You get an item bonus to damage rolls when you have combat advantage - sneak attack rolls don't get it again, they're all part and parcel of the damage roll for the attack which triggered the SA.
Harrying your Prey, the Easy Way: A Hunter's Handbook - the first of what will hopefully be many CharOp efforts on my part.
The Blinker - teleport everywhere. An Eladrin Knight/Eldritch Knight.

CB != rules source.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 22, 2013 - 10:47AM #13386
Ambisinister
Date Joined: Jan 12, 2013
Posts: 39
I'm a bit confused by the Warlock d5 Tyrannical Threat. On a hit it does damage and Curses the target. It's got an Infernal Pact Rider that allows you to Curse the target, which seems redundant. That's followed by an effect line that makes it so that cursed targets who attack you take more damage. (Here's a rough format for the power)

attack: con vs will
hit: damage plus curse
miss: half damage
Infernal Pact: curse the target
effect: caursed enemies who attack you take damage.




Is that last effect line tied to the Infernal rider or to the power in general? If the latter, then what's the point of the Infernal rider? 
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 22, 2013 - 10:58AM #13387
MalakLightfoot
Date Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Posts: 2,197

Jan 22, 2013 -- 10:47AM, Ambisinister wrote:

I'm a bit confused by the Warlock d5 Tyrannical Threat. On a hit it does damage and Curses the target. It's got an Infernal Pact Rider that allows you to Curse the target, which seems redundant. That's followed by an effect line that makes it so that cursed targets who attack you take more damage. (Here's a rough format for the power)

attack: con vs will
hit: damage plus curse
miss: half damage
Infernal Pact: curse the target
effect: caursed enemies who attack you take damage.




Is that last effect line tied to the Infernal rider or to the power in general? If the latter, then what's the point of the Infernal rider? 




The Infernal Pact rider is on the Miss line, which means that your Curse is applied even if you miss (as opposed to only when you hit for other Pacts). 

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 22, 2013 - 11:00AM #13388
FLAvatar
Date Joined: Jun 23, 2003
Posts: 1,049
it's close burst 3, which means you curse every target in a 7x7 square.  much faster than cursing them all individually =)

the infernal rider lets it curse all targets even on a miss. 


edit: ninja'd! 
INSIDE SCOOP GAMERS: In the new version of D&D, it will no longer be "Edition Wars." It will be "Edition Lair Assault." - dungeonbastard
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 23, 2013 - 7:47AM #13389
Feralspirit
Date Joined: Nov 7, 2009
Posts: 347
Is this correct...?

Arcane Admixture (Thunder) applied to Slumber of Winter's Court.

Slumber now affects creatures immune to Charm, so long as they are not also Immune to Thunder.


(Can response site source, please?)
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 23, 2013 - 7:55AM #13390
Mand12
Date Joined: Jun 17, 2010
Posts: 17,045
No, because damage keywords and effect keywords are not the same thing, and don't function in the same way. 



Immunity


Some creatures are immune to certain effects. If a creature is immune to a damage type (such as cold or fire), it doesn’t take that type of damage. If a creature is immune to charm, fear, illusion, or poison, it is unaffected by the non-damaging effects of a power that has that keyword. A creature that is immune to a condition or another effect (such as the dazed condition or forced movement) is unaffected by the stated effect.
    Immunity to one part of a power does not make a creature immune to other parts of the power. For example, when a creature that is immune to thunder is hit by a power that both deals thunder damage and pushes the target, the creature takes no damage, but the power can still push it.


Published in Rules Compendium, page(s) 225.



Note, as well, that you can't use Arcane Admixture on powers that don't deal damage. 


D&D Next = D&D:  Quantum Edition
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1339 of 1441  •  Prev 1 ... 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 ... 1441 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing