|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 9:05AM
#13331
|
Date Joined:
Nov 17, 2009
|
If you meant MBA, yes.
If you didn't mean MBA, please unacronym.
LOL! Yes. MBA
Who/What Am I?
Show
"I might have been a hmmm... eh-eh well, y'kno but, instead"
I'm a fighter... --
 
-- ...not a lover.
This signature concept is from "http://www.pathguy.com/index2.htm" html_removed What I Doing Here?
Show
@MTG Forums.
Contestant: A Contest Like No Other hosted by Fakeartist.
An Angelic Aspect In The Wild, Wild World Of The Mata Hari's Agency.
@DnD Forums.
Digital Artist In Training: What Do YOU Think MY Character Looks Like's Thread - @4e Character Development forum.
Player (Osborn) - Bounty Hunter (Fighter DnDNext): DnD presents The Walking Dead @Play By Post Forum.
Player (Shana Zorus) - Professional Bodyguard/Adventurer (Hybrid Warden/Paladin 4e): The Unhallowed Gate @Play By Post Haven Forum (DM by ffShadow)
Player (Krist Breeze) - Twiceborn War Mage/Imbuer (Hybrid Warlord/Wizard 4e): Castle Greyhawk - @Real Adventures (DM by Icanus)
Player (Blyne Munro) - Happy-Go-Lucky Scout/Explorer (Warlock 4e) Domain of Shadows-Darkness Falls - Play By Post Haven (DM by WhisperMagellan)
Player (Ansmril) - Vistani Blessed Psalmist (Bard/Shaman 4e) The Dragon Below Can't Have It This Good - (And I'm The DM)
DM - The Young Mercenaries/Ps'V-GoodShip Drow Diplomacy.
DM - The Unlikely Diplomats/Ps'V- GoodShip Drow Diplomacy.
DM - The Dragon Below Can't Have It This Good/Ps'V GoodShip Diplomacy.
Referee - People Of Oz @Dorothy's Kansas Games(inactive).
Oz League: The Ardent Lord w/People Of Oz @Dorothy's Kansas Games(inactive).
Ps'V = The Players' Vault Forum Group In Which I'm The Owner Of.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 10:31AM
#13332
|
|
|
However, neither MBA or RBA count as *class* at-will weapon attack powers.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 11:01AM
#13333
|
|
|
Dynamic Assault (the Druid at-will) allows an ally to "move" up to your Con mod as an effect -- but not "take a move action." Does this mean the ally could not elect to shift or run, but must use the walk action to move, or is it meant to allow for other kinds of moves?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 11:04AM
#13334
|
Date Joined:
Jun 17, 2010
|
Moving means moving, literally going from one square to another. When a power tells you to "move" that means the actual process of moving, not the use of any other move action.
As a comparison, the Walk action tells you to "move" up to your speed. There is no other referencing to be done.
D&D Next = D&D: Quantum Edition
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 12:52PM
#13335
|
Date Joined:
Jan 12, 2013
|
Is the following scenario a legal use of the Warlock's Curse power?
Situation: Bill is a hybrid warlock|swordmage. His buddy Ted is a wizard. They're facing two opponents A & B, one of which (B) is marked by his aegis (assault), both of which are cursed.
On Bill's Turn he blasts A with Hellish Rebuke. He triggers his Warlock's Curse to add 2d6 damage. Then he moves adjacent to A.
On A's turn, A moves away from from Bill, provoking an OA. Bill whacks him with Eldritch Strike and triggers his curse to add 2d6 damage.
On B's turn, B hits Teds, so Bill activates his aegis of assault punishment, teleports to A, whacks him with Eldritch Strike and triggers his curse to add 2d6 damage.
On Ted's turn, he uses a burst attack on B that also hits and damages Bill. Because Bill has received damage, this triggers Hellish Rebuke, so Bill damages A again and triggers his curse to add an additional 2d6 damage.
Thank ya kindly!
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 12:58PM
#13336
|
Date Joined:
Jun 17, 2010
|
Yup. Once per turn means exactly that: once per turn.
Only thing is that Bill has to be a human, otherwise it's not possible to get both Hellish Rebuke and Eldritch Strike. Oh, and you said the aegis attack teleported to A, when I think you meant B. But yeah, you've got the rules down.
D&D Next = D&D: Quantum Edition
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 1:04PM
#13337
|
Date Joined:
Jan 12, 2013
|
Oh believe me, I know. I am rolling up this very hybrid for a game, but I need to be warforged.Let me tell you, it is a tough choice trying to choose between Hellish Rebuke and Eyes of the Vestige.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 1:13PM
#13338
|
Date Joined:
Jun 17, 2010
|
The correct answer is Eldritch Strike, though...
D&D Next = D&D: Quantum Edition
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 1:17PM
#13339
|
|
|
Oh believe me, I know. I am rolling up this very hybrid for a game, but I need to be warforged.Let me tell you, it is a tough choice trying to choose between Hellish Rebuke and Eyes of the Vestige.
If you are going to have Eldritch Strike, then you will *not* be able to have any other Warlock at-will power, due to the way Hybrids work .. unless you are a Human.
So, you can have Eldritch Strike OR Hellish Rebuke OR Eyes of the Vestige and (a Swordmage level 1 at-will attack power.)
UNLESS!
If this is a Paragon game, then Bill could have the feat that lets you choose another pact option and get the at-will and stuff for that pact. I don't remember if that's legal to choose as a hybrid Warlock though.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 15, 2013 - 1:21PM
#13340
|
Date Joined:
Jan 12, 2013
|
And Undrhil wins the prize! The feat you speak of is twofold pact. As far as I am aware that is totally legitimate for hybrids to take, and for what it's worth Character Builder agrees.
|
|
|
