Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 10 of 10  •  Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10
Switch to Forum Live View D&D measuring units: "Square" should equal about 4 ft x 4 ft
5 years ago  ::  Jan 22, 2008 - 1:10PM #91
odinspearx
Date Joined: Jun 11, 2005
Posts: 134

Subedei wrote:

If we were to measure our squares in something other than 5' then I'd say the most important consideration would be making them something easy to multiply.


Easy enough: how about the number "1"? Counting in squares is all I need ... BUT I kind of like the "behind the scenes" reasoning of a 4'x4'x4' cube. I'm not saying the number 4 has to be "in your face" all day.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Feb 28, 2008 - 12:01AM #92
Haldrik
Date Joined: Jan 2, 2004
Posts: 9,400
On a related note: grids for maps.

Personally, Im content with a square grid with full diagonal movement, and I dont mind 'cubic explosions'. Also, using full diagonal moves for cubes in 3d space is no doubt the best way to simplify flying (which is a normal part of our campaigns).

Even tho the square grid is good, the offset-square grid is worth consideration. The offset can represent circular explosions, similar to the hex grid, but remains friendlier for perpendicular architecture.


Yellow: Center
Red: Opp Attack threat
Purple: Close Area attack
Blue: 6-square radius
Green: 6-square moves, vertically and horizontally


Actually, the offset-square grid is even better than the hexagonal grid because, for a 6-square move, vertical and horizontal are equal. Even less distortion.

Even an off-set cube grid for 3-dimensional space is possible, albeit probably impracticable.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Feb 28, 2008 - 12:03AM #93
Haldrik
Date Joined: Jan 2, 2004
Posts: 9,400

Odins Spear X: Easy enough: how about the number "1"? Counting in squares is all I need ... BUT I kind of like the "behind the scenes" reasoning of a 4'x4'x4' cube. I'm not saying the number 4 has to be "in your face" all day.


Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Feb 28, 2008 - 1:54AM #94
Shin_Okada
Date Joined: Jan 12, 2004
Posts: 204

Haldrik wrote:

Even tho the square grid is good, the offset-square grid is worth consideration. The offset can represent circular explosions, similar to the hex grid, but remains friendlier for perpendicular architecture.


Well, offset-square is only slightly perpendicular architecture, or typical dungeon, friendly comparing to hexes. Typical dungeons have a lot of 5-foot or 10-foot straight corridors and thus, we need to deal with a lot of "half squares".

With grids, DMs can easily make a dungeon only with 90 degree junctions and square or rectangular rooms, without annoyed by half squares, partial hexes and such. That's the biggest advantage of grids.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 10 of 10  •  Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing