Community

Big time waster: Looking up spells and effects, as mentioned above.

We need a digital database of spells or whatever. WOTC needs to make it, or at least stop threatening to sue fans when they make it themselves. When I play with a laptop at the table, and someone casts burning hands and isn't sure exactly what the numerical effects are, I should have only have to type "bur" into my laptop and select "burning hands" and read the spell description.

Books are a thing of the past. If you're charging monthly membership fees, give us something worth our money, or at least stop suing fans who are enterprising enough to spend money AND time bettering the game.

Time wasters.

Working out iniative order in a combat. If a GM has five monsters and five players then this is annoying enough as the GM collects rolls and marks people in order and the monsters in order ( if minions increase battles to twenty monsters then this will be a true headache ). Just have one side go and then the other side go. One spot check is used if the situation is unclear as which side goes first and in most situations the encounter should dictate which side has iniative.

Rolling for every single skill all the time. Taking 10 should be the default mode unless something happens to make a 'panic' or 'reaction' style of check. The GM can thus note for example the thief has a spot of X and if the thief is in the lead then the thief does or does not see Y. It simplifies the math and makes it easier to prepare an adventure in advance. If the thief chooses to sneak then the GM knows which people that the thief can get by and which ones would spot the thief.

Clear up things like dodge feat needs to be specified ( it works against everyone ). Shield spell is 360. Keeps the GM and player having to constantly 'turn their minature/describe to GM' the character's facing. It is either a benefit or it is not a benefit.

Build more bonuses and buffs into the main class and leveling. Altering buffs during an encounter, especially when they have to be checked for mixing and matching, slows things down. Also, have limits to the number of buffs per character to prevent the player and GM from having to go through a whole list to add things up or check for the different applications.

Avoid things like the Crusader that is getting randomly dealt from his pre-selected choices. If the player chooses a feat or a talent then let the player manage the usage. An extra random step is frustrating and slow.

For spells like summon and possibly polymorph, a GM tool that prints out a stat card instantly or creates a stat block for the GM to use would be good. Similar to this is that there should be choices for players but avoid unlimited choice items and abilities. Nothing says slow then a person using the Guild prestige class to fill an empty spell slot with the perfect spell for the moment.

I don't mind the dice rolling, the dice rolling means "we're doing something."

Just remeber with out the dice rolling part all your doing is telling a story.

Look, the problem isn't whether to roll dice in 4e. Instead, it's figuring out where the diminishing return on "detail" begins with the amount of dice-rolling required.

Example. Two or three sneak attacks from a mid to high level 3.5 rogue is just too time-consuming (and boring) for the amount of variation the dice actually demonstrate. 6d6 is almost always going to hover within a couple of points of 20. And a couple of HP for mid and high level characters means nothing. And, no, the odd variation on 6d6 (26 points! woo-hoo!) is not worth the time.

4e should (and will) retain dice-rolling...but there will be more flat and large bonuses to few actual dice (the above example will probably translate as 2d6 + 15 or something).