I'm not sure if it's legal but you should make a book with only races of all kinds in it for WOTC. I think you would sell a lot.
LOL
I've thought about something along those lines, using PDFs, but that would take so much time (keep in mind that just this list took a great deal of time to create).
I've thought about something along those lines, using PDFs, but that would take so much time (keep in mind that just this list took a great deal of time to create).
I would do it but for one i don't have all the books and theres a lot of races that i don't have in the books for. Also theres something about the copyright that im sure makes it illegal to make a book unless you got promotion from WOTC.
I would do it but for one i don't have all the books and theres a lot of races that i don't have in the books for. Also theres something about the copyright that im sure makes it illegal to make a book unless you got promotion from WOTC.
and the book would either need major updates every month or it will be, more or less, pointless. don't get me wrong... i'd love one, just my lists on my comp are more up to date, then said book would be.
and the book would either need major updates every month or it will be, more or less, pointless. don't get me wrong... i'd love one, just my lists on my comp are more up to date, then said book would be.
Due to popular demand, I added the two LA +0 races from Dragon Compendium Volume 1 (Lupin and Tibbit). I usually only post things published by wotc. Dragon Compendium was merely licensed by wotc to paizo publishing. For a while, I had thought about adding Dragon Compendium races to the list because as unofficial sources go, it is one of the most official and frequently used of them all. Finally, I have decided to add them
Update! :)Due to popular demand, I added the two LA +0 races from Dragon Compendium Volume 1 (Lupin and Tibbit). I usually only post things published by wotc. Dragon Compendium was merely licensed by wotc to paizo publishing. For a while, I had thoug
remember that the Lesser Planetouched only applies to those in the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting, it says so on that same page as the Lesser Planetouched in the Player's Guide to Faerun.
as a DM, i would never allow most of the Lesser Planetouched played, but i've talked a few DMs into letting me play one . mmmm.... Lesser Wispling...
remember that the Lesser Planetouched only applies to those in the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting, it says so on that same page as the Lesser Planetouched in the Player's Guide to Faerun.as a DM, i would never allow most of the Lesser Planetouched
However, I still don't see it's ability score adjustments listed. Did you reverse-engineer those?
Where have you found the stats for Jermlaine as player characters? MMII was a 3.0 book, are they updated anywhere under 3.5?Edit: Allow me to answer my own question. http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dnd/20030718aHowever, I still don't see it's
However, I still don't see it's ability score adjustments listed. Did you reverse-engineer those?
Ability score adjustments are gained by subtracting 10 from any even numbered ability score and 11 from any odd score. Not difficult to do generally, so you don't need a section for player characters-- just that little +0 level adjustment.
Ability score adjustments are gained by subtracting 10 from any even numbered ability score and 11 from any odd score. Not difficult to do generally, so you don't need a section for player characters-- just that little +0 level adjustment.
Nitpicking but there are a few typos. Rouge should be respelled to Rogue on the following entries.
Daelkyr Dark Dwarf Gully Dwarf Hadozee Kender
I love this list by the way. Thanks for all the work and keep em coming.
Tiggy
Nitpicking but there are a few typos. Rouge should be respelled to Rogue on the following entries.DaelkyrDark DwarfGully DwarfHadozeeKenderI love this list by the way. Thanks for all the work and keep em coming.Tiggy
Nitpicking but there are a few typos. Rouge should be respelled to Rogue on the following entries.
Daelkyr Dark Dwarf Gully Dwarf Hadozee Kender
That's what I get for copying and pasting the same error five times - FIXED!
Tigurius wrote:
I love this list by the way. Thanks for all the work and keep em coming.
Thanks! I will keep on adding races as new books come out, but as of right now, it's all up to date.
That's what I get for copying and pasting the same error five times - FIXED! :cool: Thanks! I will keep on adding races as new books come out, but as of right now, it's all up to date.
2. Deep Imaskari do not say they count as human in their statblock in underdark, is it stated somewhere else?
3 New Goblin Race found Drow of the Underdark I belive they should be posted as followed Vril: +2 Con, -2 Int, -2 Cha, Small, 30 ft. Skinshift, Shriek, Barbarian, Humanoid (goblinoid) Drow of the Underdark Pg 126
A few things1. Desert kobalds dont have a con penalty2. Deep Imaskari do not say they count as human in their statblock in underdark, is it stated somewhere else?3 New Goblin Race found Drow of the Underdark I belive they should be posted as followe
2. Deep Imaskari do not say they count as human in their statblock in underdark, is it stated somewhere else?
In the flavor text, it says that they are a human sub-race
Disciple_of_Juiblex wrote:
3 New Goblin Race found Drow of the Underdark I belive they should be posted as followed Vril: +2 Con, -2 Int, -2 Cha, Small, 30 ft. Skinshift, Shriek, Barbarian, Humanoid (goblinoid) Drow of the Underdark Pg 126
Well done! I will add them to this list as soon as I can take a look at Drow of the underdark for myself.
Nice Catch! - FixedIn the flavor text, it says that they are a human sub-raceWell done! I will add them to this list as soon as I can take a look at Drow of the underdark for myself.
Well, I just added Muckdwellers to the list. My only question is WTF was wotc thinking? :confused:Check them out for yourself:Muckdweller: -6 Str +6 Dex -2 Cha, tiny, 20 ft. (swim 20 ft.), squirt (ex), monstrous humanoid, serpent kingdoms pg.71
I checked the books I had for tiny or smaller animals in order to see what kind of LA 0 small anthropomorphic animals I could come up with. Some are suprisingly good.
Anthropomorphic Cat: -4 Str, +4 Dex, +4 Wis, small, 30 ft., ??, scent (ex), monstrous humanoid, savage species pg.215
Anthropomorphic Owl: -2 Str, +4 Dex, +6 Wis, -2 Cha, small, 10 ft. (fly 20ft. poor), ??, monstrous humanoid, savage species pg.215
I checked the books I had for tiny or smaller animals in order to see what kind of LA 0 small anthropomorphic animals I could come up with. Some are suprisingly good.Anthropomorphic Cat: -4 Str, +4 Dex, +4 Wis, small, 30 ft., ??, scent (ex), monstrou
Anthropomorphic Chordevoc: +2 Str, +6 Dex, +2 Con, +6 Wis, -2 Cha, small, 10 ft., fly 30 ft. (average), blindsense 60 ft. (ex), ??, monstrous humanoid, savage species pg.215, races of the wild pg.188
Congrats! You perhaps created THE most powerful LA+0 race ... (atleast that ive ever seen, i might have to get into contact with a freind of a freind to look at races of the wild about this creature)
:twitch:Congrats! You perhaps created THE most powerful LA+0 race ... (atleast that ive ever seen, i might have to get into contact with a freind of a freind to look at races of the wild about this creature)
Anthropomorphic Penguin: -4 Str, -4 Dex, +2 Wis, small, 10 ft., swim 40 ft., hold breath (ex), ??, monstrous humanoid, savage species pg.215, frostburn pg.166
"Curse you, caped crumbs! You may have outwitted the Riddler's confusing conundrums, however, you'll never escape the tentacles of my dreaded mechanical octopus!" *WAAAAAak wak wak wak wak!*
"Curse you, caped crumbs! You may have outwitted the Riddler's confusing conundrums, however, you'll never escape the tentacles of my dreaded mechanical octopus!" *WAAAAAak wak wak wak wak!*
Congrats! You perhaps created THE most powerful LA+0 race ... (atleast that ive ever seen, i might have to get into contact with a freind of a freind to look at races of the wild about this creature)
I feel dirty adding these races to the list... I need to take a second look at the rules before adding these abominations! There has to be some rule excluding these from actual use.
I feel dirty adding these races to the list... I need to take a second look at the rules before adding these abominations! There has to be some rule excluding these from actual use.
Looking over page 215 of savage species, it lists no way of determining the LA of races not already listed in the book itself. It talks about Hit Dice, but nothing about LA. How did you even determine that these races were LA +0?
Looking over page 215 of savage species, it lists no way of determining the LA of races not already listed in the book itself. It talks about Hit Dice, but nothing about LA. How did you even determine that these races were LA +0?
Nevermind. I thought that all anthropomorphic creatures based on tiny or smaller animals were Small-sized creatures with one monstrous humanoid hit dice and no Level Adjustment. I'm glad to see this isn't the case and that Wizards didn't go with a one-template fits all system. I should have checked back for the cat, owl, and viper. I was also feeling kid of dirty posting these races. Good thing I was wrong after all.
Nevermind. I thought that all anthropomorphic creatures based on tiny or smaller animals were Small-sized creatures with one monstrous humanoid hit dice and no Level Adjustment. I'm glad to see this isn't the case and that Wizards didn't go with a on
Nevermind. I thought that all anthropomorphic creatures based on tiny or smaller animals were Small-sized creatures with one monstrous humanoid hit dice and no Level Adjustment. I'm glad to see this isn't the case and that Wizards didn't go with a one-template fits all system. I should have checked back for the cat, owl, and viper. I was also feeling kid of dirty posting these races. Good thing I was wrong after all.
I think that the entire races forums can sleep a little easier knowing that these aren't playable LA +0 options. I'm glad that I checked them all over before adding them to the list. I knew that the rules for anthromorphic races were broken, but I had the feeling that they were that broken.
On a side note, I finally added Vril to the list!
I think that the entire races forums can sleep a little easier knowing that these aren't playable LA +0 options. I'm glad that I checked them all over before adding them to the list. I knew that the rules for anthromorphic races were broken, but I ha
any way we could get this stickied as it is INCREDIBLY useful and annoying to keep searching for it.
PS i do have it bookmarked but i have been using different computers.
any way we could get this stickied as it is INCREDIBLY useful and annoying to keep searching for it. PS i do have it bookmarked but i have been using different computers.
this should definatly be stickied, who agrees with me???
A better option might be to copy the Race Compendium that is no longer being updated and create a link from the top of that out to this thread. That is more likely to be stickied in my opinion.
A better option might be to copy the Race Compendium that is no longer being updated and create a link from the top of that out to this thread. That is more likely to be stickied in my opinion.
I didn't notice any anthropomorphic dinosaurs on the list. I am not sure what the various level adjustments would be (away from books atm) but I believe there are a few low HD dinosaurs that can be anthromorphed.
I didn't notice any anthropomorphic dinosaurs on the list. I am not sure what the various level adjustments would be (away from books atm) but I believe there are a few low HD dinosaurs that can be anthromorphed.
I didn't notice any anthropomorphic dinosaurs on the list. I am not sure what the various level adjustments would be (away from books atm) but I believe there are a few low HD dinosaurs that can be anthromorphed.
Well, if I don't know the LA for sure, then I can't add them to the list
Arkeas wrote:
In all honesty, I am simply replying because this thread is really helpful, and I think it should be kept at the front.
Thanks
Well, if I don't know the LA for sure, then I can't add them to the listThanks :cool:
EternalWizard, if I remember correctly, any race with one hit die loses its racial hit die when it gains a class level. After all, the Halflings, Elves and the other base races have one hit die in the Monster Manual, and I know you aren't seriously suggesting that we add a d8 to all the base races.
~I'm not insane everyone else is insane, I'm the only sane one~
EternalWizard, if I remember correctly, any race with one hit die loses its racial hit die when it gains a class level. After all, the Halflings, Elves and the other base races have one hit die in the Monster Manual, and I know you aren't seriously s
AZN, were u gonna add races from the dragon or dungeon mags?
I honestly don't plan on adding the races from dragon or dungeon magazine because I fear that adding so many more races to the list might be too massive of undertaking.
I honestly don't plan on adding the races from dragon or dungeon magazine because I fear that adding so many more races to the list might be too massive of undertaking.
I honestly don't plan on adding the races from dragon or dungeon magazine because I fear that adding so many more races to the list might be too massive of undertaking.
First let me say thank you again AZNsupermarket for making this list. I made a very fun reincarnation table based off it thanks to you. So for it has been very useful and fun!
Sadly one of my favorite LA+0 races (because they were made from my favorite all time deity!) the Aleithian Dwarves are not in it. Any chance of them getting put in? They are official from Wizards.
First let me say thank you again AZNsupermarket for making this list. I made a very fun reincarnation table based off it thanks to you. So for it has been very useful and fun!Sadly one of my favorite LA+0 races (because they were made from my favorit
Sadly one of my favorite LA+0 races (because they were made from my favorite all time deity!) the Aleithian Dwarves are not in it. Any chance of them getting put in? They are official from Wizards.
The article is from September 2003. That was after 3.5's release I believe. Or am I mistaken about this?
****
It may have been after 3.5 release but not after the 3.5 psionics update. This is demonstrated by the Psionic Combat modes in the race's description. Psionic combat = 3.0
It may have been after 3.5 release but not after the 3.5 psionics update. This is demonstrated by the Psionic Combat modes in the race's description. Psionic combat = 3.0
It may have been after 3.5 release but not after the 3.5 psionics update. This is demonstrated by the Psionic Combat modes in the race's description. Psionic combat = 3.0
Oh, my bad. Thank you for correcting me.
However, this means none of that Sardior material is usable. And he never appeared/existed in 3.5. I guess he is official dead/forgotten. I really feel sad now.
Oh, my bad. Thank you for correcting me.However, this means none of that Sardior material is usable. And he never appeared/existed in 3.5. I guess he is official dead/forgotten. I really feel sad now. :weep:
However, this means none of that Sardior material is usable. And he never appeared/existed in 3.5. I guess he is official dead/forgotten. I really feel sad now.
too bad. they seemed like a really powerful race, but how many dwarven sub-races do you need? this little guy won't be able to make the list because he's 3.0:
too bad. they seemed like a really powerful race, but how many dwarven sub-races do you need? this little guy won't be able to make the list because he's 3.0: :(Aleithian Dwarf +2 Constitution, +2 Intelligence, -4 Charisma, medium, 20 ft., light sens
Forest gnomes do not have the same speak with animals 1/day ability that other gnomes have. Instead, they can speak a simple language with forest animals all the time.
From the SRD:
Forest Gnome Traits (Ex) These traits are in addition to the rock gnome traits, except where noted.
Automatic Languages: Gnome, Elven, Sylvan, and a simple language that enables them to communicate on a very basic level with forest animals (this replaces the rock gnome’s speak with animals ability). Bonus Languages: Common, Draconic, Dwarven, Giant, Goblin, Orc. This trait replaces the rock gnome’s automatic and bonus languages.
Great list! It really helps having all this information in one place.However, I am currently playing a forest gnome and noticed a possible error:Forest gnomes do not have the same speak with animals 1/day ability that other gnomes have. Instead, they
Great list! It really helps having all this information in one place.
However, I am currently playing a forest gnome and noticed a possible error:
Forest gnomes do not have the same speak with animals 1/day ability that other gnomes have. Instead, they can speak a simple language with forest animals all the time.
i probably just missed it how did you determine the stats for the muckdweller from serpent kingdoms?
Ability score adjustments are gained by subtracting 10 from any even numbered ability score and 11 from any odd score from the stats of the example muckdweller. Not difficult to do generally, so you don't need a section for player characters-- just that little +0 level adjustment. You also gain all abilities gained in the combat section of the race. Looking over the muckdweller stats, it appears that I forgot to include a -2 wis. My bad! So a muckdweller real stats are:
Ability score adjustments are gained by subtracting 10 from any even numbered ability score and 11 from any odd score from the stats of the example muckdweller. Not difficult to do generally, so you don't need a section for player characters-- just t
Hey, AZNsupermarket... I was curious if you know where someone could find the errata designating Fauns as LA 0?
Someone was asking and I can't remember... but I'm sure I had seen it somewhere before?
Hey, AZNsupermarket... I was curious if you know where someone could find the errata designating Fauns as LA 0?Someone was asking and I can't remember... but I'm sure I had seen it somewhere before?
Just a quick suggestion here: listing the starting ages and "vital statistics" for these races would be even better. I can't seem to find those for the Raptoran race.
Just a quick suggestion here: listing the starting ages and "vital statistics" for these races would be even better. I can't seem to find those for the Raptoran race. :weep:
Just a quick suggestion here: listing the starting ages and "vital statistics" for these races would be even better. I can't seem to find those for the Raptoran race.
This isn't intended to replace the need to buy the books. It always you to compare races found in multiple books. Once you find the race you want you should look in the appropriate book for all the race specifics.
This isn't intended to replace the need to buy the books. It always you to compare races found in multiple books. Once you find the race you want you should look in the appropriate book for all the race specifics.
The Blue in the Expanded Psionics Handbook is listed as +0 Level Adjustment on pg 189 and +1 Level Adjustment on pg 190. I think the one on page 190 is a typo they don't have anything to warrant a level adjustment.
The Blue in the Expanded Psionics Handbook is listed as +0 Level Adjustment on pg 189 and +1 Level Adjustment on pg 190. I think the one on page 190 is a typo they don't have anything to warrant a level adjustment.
The Blue in the Expanded Psionics Handbook is listed as +0 Level Adjustment on pg 189 and +1 Level Adjustment on pg 190. I think the one on page 190 is a typo they don't have anything to warrant a level adjustment.
Also, would you like to add Gruwaar and T'Kel to your list? They were featured in Dragon Magazine 317 on pages 25 and 28 respectively.
Gruwaar: +2 Dex, +2 Cha, -2 Str, -2 Wis, small, 20 ft. (30 ft. on all fours), rogue, fey
T'kel: +2 Dex, -2 Int, medium, 30 ft. (20 ft. swim), monk, monstrous humanoid
Would Vril also have a +2 to Str that is not listed on your list?In the errata, they have 13 Str originally.Their errata lists them as a LA +1 race.Also, would you like to add Gruwaar and T'Kel to your list? They were featured in Dragon Magazine 317
Just a quick suggestion here: listing the starting ages and "vital statistics" for these races would be even better. I can't seem to find those for the Raptoran race.
Blue characters possess the following racial traits.
* -2 Strength, +2 Intelligence, -2 Charisma. * Small size: +1 bonus to Armor Class, +1 bonus on attack rolls, +4 bonus on Hide checks, -4 penalty on grapple checks, lifting and carrying limits ¾ of those of Medium characters. * Blue base land speed is 30 feet. * Darkvision out to 60 feet. * Naturally Psionic: Blues gain 1 bonus power point at 1st level. * Racial Skills: A blue character has a +4 racial bonus on Move Silently checks and Ride checks. * Automatic Languages: Common, Goblin. Bonus Languages: Draconic, Elven, Giant, Gnoll, Orc. * Favored Class: Psion. * Level Adjustment: +1.
Ok, so what exactly bumps them up to a +1 level adjustment, I don't see it. They are exactly like a goblin but with a +2 to Intelligence instead of Dexterity and 1 psionic power point. How does this warrant a level adjustment?
* -2 Strength, +2 Dexterity, -2 Charisma. * Small size: +1 bonus to Armor Class, +1 bonus on attack rolls, +4 bonus on Hide checks, -4 penalty on grapple checks, lifting and carrying limits ¾ those of Medium characters. * A goblin’s base land speed is 30 feet. * Darkvision out to 60 feet. * +4 racial bonus on Move Silently and Ride checks. * Automatic Languages: Common, Goblin. Bonus Languages: Draconic, Elven, Giant, Gnoll, Orc. * Favored Class: Rogue.
Blue characters possess the following racial traits. * -2 Strength, +2 Intelligence, -2 Charisma. * Small size: +1 bonus to Armor Class, +1 bonus on attack rolls, +4 bonus on Hide checks, -4 penalty on grapple checks, lifting and carrying limit
Ok, so what exactly bumps them up to a +1 level adjustment, I don't see it. They are exactly like a goblin but with a +2 to Intelligence instead of Dexterity and 1 psionic power point. How does this warrant a level adjustment?
When Blues were published, they didn't really have any other races with bonuses to mental stats outside of Forgotten Realms. (Maybe gray elves.) Now there are probably half a dozen with a +2 to Intelligence they should probably be 0 level adjustment.
When Blues were published, they didn't really have any other races with bonuses to mental stats outside of Forgotten Realms. (Maybe gray elves.) Now there are probably half a dozen with a +2 to Intelligence they should probably be 0 level adjustment
Ok, so what exactly bumps them up to a +1 level adjustment, I don't see it. They are exactly like a goblin but with a +2 to Intelligence instead of Dexterity and 1 psionic power point. How does this warrant a level adjustment?
I agree that they probably shouldn't be level adjustment, but the thread is intended to list all official WotC LA +0 races. Any that were given the final word by WotC as +1 or higher are not meant to be on this list. Perhaps AZN could be persuaded into adding the LA +1 races that probably shouldn't be LA +1 as an option for people who want to houserule them in... but that's kinda the thing, it seems that originally the whole idea was to only include races that were published or errata'd to be LA +0 by WotC (not even third party, but I could be wrong about that).
If we went with your argument, he would likely need to remove Whisper Gnome from the list (or at least debate about it) or change it's listing up since most players that I've heard of houserule them to be LA +1 in some situations. Also, the lesser planetouched are disallowed from some games, etc. I have a friend that thinks that none of the Mephlings in Planar Handbook warrant a LA +1 especially if you simply removed their breath weapon (which isn't very good anyway). But again, those are houserules and I'm pretty sure the thread is to provide a comprehensive list of official WotC LA +0 races.
I agree that they probably shouldn't be level adjustment, but the thread is intended to list all official WotC LA +0 races. Any that were given the final word by WotC as +1 or higher are not meant to be on this list. Perhaps AZN could be persuaded in
From everything i could find the Lesser Aasimar have a +1 Cha or +1 Str and a +1 Wis, as well as a -2 penalty to Con.
go read the page, it's maked, all except this, ... (players guide to faerun, p 191 from memory) and the only thing that change is the type
BTW, 3.x doesn't do +/-1 it's by increaments of 2
go read the page, it's maked, all except this, ... (players guide to faerun, p 191 from memory)and the only thing that change is the typeBTW, 3.x doesn't do +/-1 it's by increaments of 2
Wow, they really don't want anyone to start the game with a +2 Wisdom and no LA. The only wisdom bonus I see on that entire list is the Buommin, and they can't freaking talk.
Wow, they really don't want anyone to start the game with a +2 Wisdom and no LA. The only wisdom bonus I see on that entire list is the Buommin, and they can't freaking talk.
for being so full of AWESOME & WIN
. mmmm.... Lesser Wispling...
