Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 4 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4
Switch to Forum Live View Response to the Wotc Announcement!!!
3 years ago  ::  Jan 30, 2010 - 6:38PM #31
forcepush71
Date Joined: Oct 3, 2005
Posts: 827

If alternate cards are the way to go it would be interesting to optimize alternate cards based on pt level.  So you could have 100, 150, 200 and mass combat versions of Agen Kolar, Vader etc...

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jan 30, 2010 - 9:40PM #32
AdmiralMotti89
Date Joined: Dec 25, 2007
Posts: 702

Jan 30, 2010 -- 6:38PM, forcepush71 wrote:


If alternate cards are the way to go it would be interesting to optimize alternate cards based on pt level.  So you could have 100, 150, 200 and mass combat versions of Agen Kolar, Vader etc...




I really wish I could get across what's been talked about on Gamers.

Do you want to help advance the game when Wizards pulls the plug?

Go Here:

http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75862/22337613/Minis_YOU_want_to_see:_The_first_step

-
-
-
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jan 31, 2010 - 5:02AM #33
Squid89
Date Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 934
I'm certainly not against new cards to bring some old pieces into new light, just wanted to address a concern.  It appears, it has been addressed, so that's cool.  I fully understand the points being made and don't have a problem myself, more just playing devil's advocate.

I guess it's not the updated cards that bother me, but new/different abilities with the same mini represented on the board.  When I see a particular enemy piece on the board, I know what stats to expect.  It would just take some getting used to the idea that it would be different and I'd have to ask which stats were being used for that game and check cards before each match.  I've seen it come up with proxy pieces in friendly games.  Not a big deal, just something I'm glad is being considered early.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Jan 31, 2010 - 9:41PM #34
Zombie_Jawa
Date Joined: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 177
I've sized it up a bit and am pretty convinced that -with the exception of about 6-8 pieces- if you took all the pieces from the first four sets (6pts or greater) and reduced the cost by 10% (rounded off) nearly all of the old pieces seem to settle into nearly the right point cost compared to the newer 'power crept' pieces. 
   For example, check out how the old Luke, Vader and Anakin would now be costed properly against the newer Lukes, Vaders and Anakin pieces.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 4 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing